Search alternatives:
significant decrease » significant increase (Expand Search), significantly increased (Expand Search)
significantly better » significantly greater (Expand Search), significantly higher (Expand Search), significantly lower (Expand Search)
better decrease » greater decrease (Expand Search), teer decrease (Expand Search), between decreased (Expand Search)
significant decrease » significant increase (Expand Search), significantly increased (Expand Search)
significantly better » significantly greater (Expand Search), significantly higher (Expand Search), significantly lower (Expand Search)
better decrease » greater decrease (Expand Search), teer decrease (Expand Search), between decreased (Expand Search)
-
1681
-
1682
-
1683
Design and machining schematic of the novel ZPC for the Chinese population.
Published 2025Subjects: -
1684
-
1685
-
1686
-
1687
Stacked bar of motion distribution of intact specimen under different working conditions.
Published 2025Subjects: -
1688
Parameters of the newly designed ZPC for the Chinese population used in test.
Published 2025Subjects: -
1689
-
1690
MGPC module.
Published 2025“…Experimental results indicate that at a pruning level of 1.5, mAP@0.5 and mAP@0.5:0.95 improved by 3.9% and 4.6%, respectively, while computational load decreased by 21% and parameter count dropped by 53%. …”
-
1691
Comparative experiment.
Published 2025“…Experimental results indicate that at a pruning level of 1.5, mAP@0.5 and mAP@0.5:0.95 improved by 3.9% and 4.6%, respectively, while computational load decreased by 21% and parameter count dropped by 53%. …”
-
1692
Pruning experiment.
Published 2025“…Experimental results indicate that at a pruning level of 1.5, mAP@0.5 and mAP@0.5:0.95 improved by 3.9% and 4.6%, respectively, while computational load decreased by 21% and parameter count dropped by 53%. …”
-
1693
Parameter setting table.
Published 2025“…Experimental results indicate that at a pruning level of 1.5, mAP@0.5 and mAP@0.5:0.95 improved by 3.9% and 4.6%, respectively, while computational load decreased by 21% and parameter count dropped by 53%. …”
-
1694
DTADH module.
Published 2025“…Experimental results indicate that at a pruning level of 1.5, mAP@0.5 and mAP@0.5:0.95 improved by 3.9% and 4.6%, respectively, while computational load decreased by 21% and parameter count dropped by 53%. …”
-
1695
Ablation experiment.
Published 2025“…Experimental results indicate that at a pruning level of 1.5, mAP@0.5 and mAP@0.5:0.95 improved by 3.9% and 4.6%, respectively, while computational load decreased by 21% and parameter count dropped by 53%. …”
-
1696
Multi scale detection.
Published 2025“…Experimental results indicate that at a pruning level of 1.5, mAP@0.5 and mAP@0.5:0.95 improved by 3.9% and 4.6%, respectively, while computational load decreased by 21% and parameter count dropped by 53%. …”
-
1697
MFDPN module.
Published 2025“…Experimental results indicate that at a pruning level of 1.5, mAP@0.5 and mAP@0.5:0.95 improved by 3.9% and 4.6%, respectively, while computational load decreased by 21% and parameter count dropped by 53%. …”
-
1698
Detection effect of different sizes.
Published 2025“…Experimental results indicate that at a pruning level of 1.5, mAP@0.5 and mAP@0.5:0.95 improved by 3.9% and 4.6%, respectively, while computational load decreased by 21% and parameter count dropped by 53%. …”
-
1699
Radar chart comparing indicators.
Published 2025“…Experimental results indicate that at a pruning level of 1.5, mAP@0.5 and mAP@0.5:0.95 improved by 3.9% and 4.6%, respectively, while computational load decreased by 21% and parameter count dropped by 53%. …”
-
1700
MFD-YOLO structure.
Published 2025“…Experimental results indicate that at a pruning level of 1.5, mAP@0.5 and mAP@0.5:0.95 improved by 3.9% and 4.6%, respectively, while computational load decreased by 21% and parameter count dropped by 53%. …”