Search alternatives:
significant decrease » significant increase (Expand Search), significantly increased (Expand Search)
significantly change » significant change (Expand Search), significantly enhance (Expand Search), significant changes (Expand Search)
change decrease » change increases (Expand Search), change degree (Expand Search)
significant decrease » significant increase (Expand Search), significantly increased (Expand Search)
significantly change » significant change (Expand Search), significantly enhance (Expand Search), significant changes (Expand Search)
change decrease » change increases (Expand Search), change degree (Expand Search)
-
1281
Differences in total Tau and p-Tau Thr231 following maternal Pg-OMV exposure.
Published 2025Subjects: -
1282
-
1283
-
1284
Comparison of gut microbial composition at the phylum level pre- and post-surgery.
Published 2025Subjects: -
1285
-
1286
-
1287
-
1288
-
1289
Study Data.
Published 2025“…The average heart rate (HR) slowing (3.2 bpm ± 3.9 in the control group, 3.7 bpm ± 3.8 in the dexamethasone group), and maximal HR slowing (5.0 bpm ± 3.9 in the control group, 5.0 bpm ± 3.8 in the dexamethasone group) over the five minutes following sugammadex administration were not significant between groups (average HR slowing p = 0.553, maximal HR slowing p = 0.988). …”
-
1290
Study outcomes.
Published 2025“…The average heart rate (HR) slowing (3.2 bpm ± 3.9 in the control group, 3.7 bpm ± 3.8 in the dexamethasone group), and maximal HR slowing (5.0 bpm ± 3.9 in the control group, 5.0 bpm ± 3.8 in the dexamethasone group) over the five minutes following sugammadex administration were not significant between groups (average HR slowing p = 0.553, maximal HR slowing p = 0.988). …”
-
1291
Patient characteristics.
Published 2025“…The average heart rate (HR) slowing (3.2 bpm ± 3.9 in the control group, 3.7 bpm ± 3.8 in the dexamethasone group), and maximal HR slowing (5.0 bpm ± 3.9 in the control group, 5.0 bpm ± 3.8 in the dexamethasone group) over the five minutes following sugammadex administration were not significant between groups (average HR slowing p = 0.553, maximal HR slowing p = 0.988). …”
-
1292
-
1293
-
1294
-
1295
-
1296
-
1297
Comprehensive evaluation index system of EDI.
Published 2025“…The results show that China’s educational development level continues to increasing from 2003 to 2020, but a significant decrease in its growth rate. In this process, regional differences in education inequality in China have gradually narrowed, which can be confirmed by changes in the Gini coefficient and Theil index. …”
-
1298
The results of robust tests.
Published 2025“…The results show that China’s educational development level continues to increasing from 2003 to 2020, but a significant decrease in its growth rate. In this process, regional differences in education inequality in China have gradually narrowed, which can be confirmed by changes in the Gini coefficient and Theil index. …”
-
1299
Impact mechanism of influencing factors on EDI.
Published 2025“…The results show that China’s educational development level continues to increasing from 2003 to 2020, but a significant decrease in its growth rate. In this process, regional differences in education inequality in China have gradually narrowed, which can be confirmed by changes in the Gini coefficient and Theil index. …”
-
1300
Global average ignition delay time of oil droplets with volume of 0.1-0.5ml.
Published 2025Subjects: