Search alternatives:
significantly enhanced » significantly influenced (Expand Search), significantly reduced (Expand Search)
significant decrease » significant increase (Expand Search), significantly increased (Expand Search)
significantly enhanced » significantly influenced (Expand Search), significantly reduced (Expand Search)
significant decrease » significant increase (Expand Search), significantly increased (Expand Search)
-
2001
-
2002
-
2003
-
2004
-
2005
-
2006
-
2007
-
2008
-
2009
-
2010
Data Sheet 1_OvaRePred (HerTempo): an enhanced ovarian aging clock for personalized reserve assessment, endocrine age modeling, and predicting reproductive milestones across the fe...
Published 2025“…AMH sampling on different cycle days showed only modest effects from minor fluctuations; only substantial AMH decreases significantly affected prediction accuracy. …”
-
2011
Table 1_Shengxue Busui Decoction activates the PI3K/Akt and VEGF pathways, enhancing vascular function and inhibiting osteocyte apoptosis to combat steroid-induced femoral head nec...
Published 2025“…In vivo, SBD intervention significantly reduced bone structural damage and apoptosis, decreasing the rate of empty bone lacunae. …”
-
2012
Accuracy test results.
Published 2025“…The runtime memory usage on the CIFAR-100 dataset is only 44.52%, a decrease of 44.56% compared to the baseline model. …”
-
2013
Experiment environment and parameter.
Published 2025“…The runtime memory usage on the CIFAR-100 dataset is only 44.52%, a decrease of 44.56% compared to the baseline model. …”
-
2014
Test results for NME and FR.
Published 2025“…The runtime memory usage on the CIFAR-100 dataset is only 44.52%, a decrease of 44.56% compared to the baseline model. …”
-
2015
DARTS algorithm process.
Published 2025“…The runtime memory usage on the CIFAR-100 dataset is only 44.52%, a decrease of 44.56% compared to the baseline model. …”
-
2016
Comparison result of memory usage.
Published 2025“…The runtime memory usage on the CIFAR-100 dataset is only 44.52%, a decrease of 44.56% compared to the baseline model. …”
-
2017
LKA model structure.
Published 2025“…The runtime memory usage on the CIFAR-100 dataset is only 44.52%, a decrease of 44.56% compared to the baseline model. …”
-
2018
Test results on different datasets.
Published 2025“…The runtime memory usage on the CIFAR-100 dataset is only 44.52%, a decrease of 44.56% compared to the baseline model. …”
-
2019
Comparison result of memory usage.
Published 2025“…The runtime memory usage on the CIFAR-100 dataset is only 44.52%, a decrease of 44.56% compared to the baseline model. …”
-
2020
Residual configuration.
Published 2025“…The runtime memory usage on the CIFAR-100 dataset is only 44.52%, a decrease of 44.56% compared to the baseline model. …”