Search alternatives:
significant decrease » significant increase (Expand Search), significantly increased (Expand Search)
significantly high » significantly higher (Expand Search), significantly change (Expand Search), significantly less (Expand Search)
high decrease » slight decrease (Expand Search), high degree (Expand Search), high disease (Expand Search)
Showing 1,421 - 1,440 results of 6,342 for search '(( significant decrease decrease ) OR ( significantly high decrease ))~', query time: 0.34s Refine Results
  1. 1421
    Results of correlation analysis using Kendall’s rank correlation coefficient.

    Results of correlation analysis using Kendall’s rank correlation coefficient. by Roman Vavrek (13200141)

    Published 2024
    Subjects:
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  2. 1422
    A set of 3 criteria for the needs of multi-criteria evaluation ‐ combinations C1–C10.

    A set of 3 criteria for the needs of multi-criteria evaluation ‐ combinations C1–C10. by Roman Vavrek (13200141)

    Published 2024
    Subjects:
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  3. 1423
    Comparison of agreement in the order based on the SD-TOPSIS technique across groups of combinations - B1-B5 vs. C1-C10 vs. D1-D10.

    Comparison of agreement in the order based on the SD-TOPSIS technique across groups of combinations - B1-B5 vs. C1-C10 vs. D1-D10. by Roman Vavrek (13200141)

    Published 2024
    Subjects:
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  4. 1424
    The principle of operation of the TOPSIS technique.

    The principle of operation of the TOPSIS technique. by Roman Vavrek (13200141)

    Published 2024
    Subjects:
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  5. 1425
    Lower quartile of district towns evaluated by the SD-TOPSIS technique ‐ combination of A, B1, B1 and C1.

    Lower quartile of district towns evaluated by the SD-TOPSIS technique ‐ combination of A, B1, B1 and C1. by Roman Vavrek (13200141)

    Published 2024
    Subjects:
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  6. 1426
    Agreement with tolerance in the order of district towns in the results of SD-TOPSIS application in space ‐ combination A vs. C1.

    Agreement with tolerance in the order of district towns in the results of SD-TOPSIS application in space ‐ combination A vs. C1. by Roman Vavrek (13200141)

    Published 2024
    Subjects:
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  7. 1427
    The importance of entry criteria from the point of view of the SD method ‐ combinations B1 –B5.

    The importance of entry criteria from the point of view of the SD method ‐ combinations B1 –B5. by Roman Vavrek (13200141)

    Published 2024
    Subjects:
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  8. 1428
    Comparison of rank correlation analysis results across groups of combinations - B1-B5 vs. C1-C10 vs. D1-D10.

    Comparison of rank correlation analysis results across groups of combinations - B1-B5 vs. C1-C10 vs. D1-D10. by Roman Vavrek (13200141)

    Published 2024
    Subjects:
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  9. 1429
    Comparison of the selected multi-criteria methods.

    Comparison of the selected multi-criteria methods. by Roman Vavrek (13200141)

    Published 2024
    Subjects:
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  10. 1430
    Agreement in the order of district towns in the results of the SD-TOPSIS application in space ‐ combination A vs. C1.

    Agreement in the order of district towns in the results of the SD-TOPSIS application in space ‐ combination A vs. C1. by Roman Vavrek (13200141)

    Published 2024
    Subjects:
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  11. 1431
    Description of results of SD-TOPSIS application (combination A) using selected moment characteristics.

    Description of results of SD-TOPSIS application (combination A) using selected moment characteristics. by Roman Vavrek (13200141)

    Published 2024
    Subjects:
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  12. 1432
    Results of SD-TOPSIS application ‐ combinations B1-B5.

    Results of SD-TOPSIS application ‐ combinations B1-B5. by Roman Vavrek (13200141)

    Published 2024
    Subjects:
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  13. 1433
    Results of SD-TOPSIS application ‐ combinations C1-C10.

    Results of SD-TOPSIS application ‐ combinations C1-C10. by Roman Vavrek (13200141)

    Published 2024
    Subjects:
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  14. 1434
    A set of 2 criteria for the needs of multi-criteria evaluation ‐ combinations D1–D10.

    A set of 2 criteria for the needs of multi-criteria evaluation ‐ combinations D1–D10. by Roman Vavrek (13200141)

    Published 2024
    Subjects:
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  15. 1435
    Results of SD-TOPSIS application ‐ combination A.

    Results of SD-TOPSIS application ‐ combination A. by Roman Vavrek (13200141)

    Published 2024
    Subjects:
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  16. 1436
    ANOM analysis of evaluated criteria K1–K5.

    ANOM analysis of evaluated criteria K1–K5. by Roman Vavrek (13200141)

    Published 2024
    Subjects:
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  17. 1437
    The importance of entry criteria from the point of view of the SD method ‐ combinations C1 –C10.

    The importance of entry criteria from the point of view of the SD method ‐ combinations C1 –C10. by Roman Vavrek (13200141)

    Published 2024
    Subjects:
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  18. 1438
    The importance of entry criteria from the point of view of the SD method ‐ combination A.

    The importance of entry criteria from the point of view of the SD method ‐ combination A. by Roman Vavrek (13200141)

    Published 2024
    Subjects:
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  19. 1439
    Scatter plots of the linear regression for the relationship between the duration of the vegetative phase and the average mass of single inflorescences.

    Scatter plots of the linear regression for the relationship between the duration of the vegetative phase and the average mass of single inflorescences. by Torsten Schober (20485754)

    Published 2024
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  20. 1440
    Fig 5 -

    Fig 5 - by Torsten Schober (20485754)

    Published 2024
    Save to List
    Saved in:

Search Tools: