Search alternatives:
significant decrease » significant increase (Expand Search), significantly increased (Expand Search)
higher decrease » higher degree (Expand Search), higher degrees (Expand Search), highest increase (Expand Search)
significant decrease » significant increase (Expand Search), significantly increased (Expand Search)
higher decrease » higher degree (Expand Search), higher degrees (Expand Search), highest increase (Expand Search)
-
1861
-
1862
-
1863
Imaging CDK4/6 Broaden Options of Breast Cancer Diagnostics with Positron Emission Tomography
Published 2025Subjects: -
1864
Imaging CDK4/6 Broaden Options of Breast Cancer Diagnostics with Positron Emission Tomography
Published 2025Subjects: -
1865
Imaging CDK4/6 Broaden Options of Breast Cancer Diagnostics with Positron Emission Tomography
Published 2025Subjects: -
1866
Imaging CDK4/6 Broaden Options of Breast Cancer Diagnostics with Positron Emission Tomography
Published 2025Subjects: -
1867
Imaging CDK4/6 Broaden Options of Breast Cancer Diagnostics with Positron Emission Tomography
Published 2025Subjects: -
1868
Imaging CDK4/6 Broaden Options of Breast Cancer Diagnostics with Positron Emission Tomography
Published 2025Subjects: -
1869
Imaging CDK4/6 Broaden Options of Breast Cancer Diagnostics with Positron Emission Tomography
Published 2025Subjects: -
1870
-
1871
Linear covariate analysis of prognostically significant metabolites. Presenting the effect sizes of metabolites that showed significant differences among prognostic groups in ICU-treated COVID-19 patients....
Published 2025“…<p>Linear covariate analysis of prognostically significant metabolites. Presenting the effect sizes of metabolites that showed significant differences among prognostic groups in ICU-treated COVID-19 patients. …”
-
1872
Preference for the EIA – conjoint results.
Published 2025“…A randomized conjoint experiment and a follow-up choice experiment revealed that support for the EIAs decreased sharply as their accuracy gap grew, although impact parity was prioritized more when ETAs produced large outcome discrepancies. …”
-
1873
Marginal means – Pooled across scenarios.
Published 2025“…A randomized conjoint experiment and a follow-up choice experiment revealed that support for the EIAs decreased sharply as their accuracy gap grew, although impact parity was prioritized more when ETAs produced large outcome discrepancies. …”
-
1874
Sample attribute table.
Published 2025“…A randomized conjoint experiment and a follow-up choice experiment revealed that support for the EIAs decreased sharply as their accuracy gap grew, although impact parity was prioritized more when ETAs produced large outcome discrepancies. …”
-
1875
Subgroup analysis – Political affiliation.
Published 2025“…A randomized conjoint experiment and a follow-up choice experiment revealed that support for the EIAs decreased sharply as their accuracy gap grew, although impact parity was prioritized more when ETAs produced large outcome discrepancies. …”
-
1876
Sample scenario description.
Published 2025“…A randomized conjoint experiment and a follow-up choice experiment revealed that support for the EIAs decreased sharply as their accuracy gap grew, although impact parity was prioritized more when ETAs produced large outcome discrepancies. …”
-
1877
AMCEs – Pooled across scenarios.
Published 2025“…A randomized conjoint experiment and a follow-up choice experiment revealed that support for the EIAs decreased sharply as their accuracy gap grew, although impact parity was prioritized more when ETAs produced large outcome discrepancies. …”
-
1878
Methodological flowchart.
Published 2025“…A randomized conjoint experiment and a follow-up choice experiment revealed that support for the EIAs decreased sharply as their accuracy gap grew, although impact parity was prioritized more when ETAs produced large outcome discrepancies. …”
-
1879
Preference for the EIA vs. ETA across scenarios.
Published 2025“…A randomized conjoint experiment and a follow-up choice experiment revealed that support for the EIAs decreased sharply as their accuracy gap grew, although impact parity was prioritized more when ETAs produced large outcome discrepancies. …”
-
1880