Search alternatives:
significant decrease » significant increase (Expand Search), significantly increased (Expand Search)
significantly i » significantly _ (Expand Search), significantly high (Expand Search), significantly less (Expand Search)
i decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), a decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search)
significant decrease » significant increase (Expand Search), significantly increased (Expand Search)
significantly i » significantly _ (Expand Search), significantly high (Expand Search), significantly less (Expand Search)
i decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), a decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search)
-
5841
Block diagram illustrating the solution approach.
Published 2025“…The algorithm was applied to real customer orders in a steel manufacturer and showed significant benefits by reducing the number of planners from four to merely one person and decreasing the cutting planning time from six hours to under one hour. …”
-
5842
Example of graph representation of an CSP.
Published 2025“…The algorithm was applied to real customer orders in a steel manufacturer and showed significant benefits by reducing the number of planners from four to merely one person and decreasing the cutting planning time from six hours to under one hour. …”
-
5843
Feasible stopper/saw positions.
Published 2025“…The algorithm was applied to real customer orders in a steel manufacturer and showed significant benefits by reducing the number of planners from four to merely one person and decreasing the cutting planning time from six hours to under one hour. …”
-
5844
Pseudocode of the WACO algorithm.
Published 2025“…The algorithm was applied to real customer orders in a steel manufacturer and showed significant benefits by reducing the number of planners from four to merely one person and decreasing the cutting planning time from six hours to under one hour. …”
-
5845
Schematic of the cutting machine.
Published 2025“…The algorithm was applied to real customer orders in a steel manufacturer and showed significant benefits by reducing the number of planners from four to merely one person and decreasing the cutting planning time from six hours to under one hour. …”
-
5846
Panels show results of gut microbiota and nutritional intake analyses by provinces.
Published 2025“…For panel C, box plots represent the mean with standard deviation (SD) of the samples. Statistical significance: *: <i>p</i> < 0.05, **: <i>p</i> < 0.01, ***: <i>p</i> < 0.001, ****: <i>p</i> < 0.0001.…”
-
5847
-
5848
Neutrophil recruitment after <i>H</i>. <i>pylori</i> infection monitored by multiphoton microscopy <i>in vivo</i>.
Published 2024“…<i>pylori</i> infection, neutrophil velocity is significantly increased compared to control 24-hours post infection. …”
-
5849
Effect of overexpressing <i>CEBPB</i> and <i>GFI-1</i> on <i>SOST</i> expression.
Published 2025“…<i>GFI-1</i> was significantly upregulated 48 h after transfection of CRISPRa plasmids with sgRNAs that targeted the GFI promoter (43-fold, P < 0.0001; <b>left panel</b>). …”
-
5850
Principal coordinates analysis (PCoA).
Published 2025“…</p><p>Results</p><p>The overall bacterial abundance and distribution were significantly higher in the SESKD and NSESKD groups compared to the control group (<i><i>p</i></i> < 0.05), with no significant differences between the SESKD and NSESKD groups. …”
-
5851
-
5852
Balance test results.
Published 2025“…Specifically, with every 1% increase in RLM, the likelihood of rural residents’ HWSW will decrease by 3.5%. …”
-
5853
Mechanism analysis results.
Published 2025“…Specifically, with every 1% increase in RLM, the likelihood of rural residents’ HWSW will decrease by 3.5%. …”
-
5854
Endogenous test results.
Published 2025“…Specifically, with every 1% increase in RLM, the likelihood of rural residents’ HWSW will decrease by 3.5%. …”
-
5855
Heterogeneity analysis results.
Published 2025“…Specifically, with every 1% increase in RLM, the likelihood of rural residents’ HWSW will decrease by 3.5%. …”
-
5856
Robustness test results.
Published 2025“…Specifically, with every 1% increase in RLM, the likelihood of rural residents’ HWSW will decrease by 3.5%. …”
-
5857
Baseline results of the impact of RLM on HWSW.
Published 2025“…Specifically, with every 1% increase in RLM, the likelihood of rural residents’ HWSW will decrease by 3.5%. …”
-
5858
The influencing factors of RLM.
Published 2025“…Specifically, with every 1% increase in RLM, the likelihood of rural residents’ HWSW will decrease by 3.5%. …”
-
5859
Variable definitions and basic statistics.
Published 2025“…Specifically, with every 1% increase in RLM, the likelihood of rural residents’ HWSW will decrease by 3.5%. …”
-
5860