Search alternatives:
significant decrease » significant increase (Expand Search), significantly increased (Expand Search)
significantly impact » significant impact (Expand Search), significantly improve (Expand Search), significantly improved (Expand Search)
significant decrease » significant increase (Expand Search), significantly increased (Expand Search)
significantly impact » significant impact (Expand Search), significantly improve (Expand Search), significantly improved (Expand Search)
-
3661
-
3662
-
3663
-
3664
-
3665
Linear regressions of consumer stable carbon and nitrogen isotope values and collection date.
Published 2025Subjects: -
3666
Phagocytosis of SMPs by alveolar macrophages of MH-S cell line evaluated by flow cytometry.
Published 2025Subjects: -
3667
Compound eye blindfolding and its effect on the search for oviposition sites.
Published 2024Subjects: -
3668
-
3669
-
3670
Cell viability of alveolar macrophages of MH-S cell line stimulated with SMPs for 24
Published 2025Subjects: -
3671
S1 Data -
Published 2024“…The total chlorophyll content of blueberry leaves at 25% light intensity increased by 76.4% compared with CK during the blue fruiting stage; the maximum net photosynthetic rate (Pmax), light compensation point (LCP), light saturation point (LSP), rate of dark respirations (Rd), inter-cellular CO<sub>2</sub> concentration (Ci), stomatal conductance (Gs), transpiration rate (Tr), net photosynthesis rate (Pn), and chlorophyll a/b showed a decreasing trend with decreasing light intensity. The Pn of blueberry leaves was highest under full light conditions at all three stages, and the Pn at 25% light intensity decreased by 68.5% compared with CK during the white fruiting stage Reflecting the fact that blueberries can adapt to low-light environments through increases in chlorophyll and carotenoids, but reduced light intensity significantly inhibited their photosynthesis. …”
-
3672
-
3673
-
3674
-
3675
-
3676
-
3677
-
3678
-
3679
Raw data.
Published 2025“…The impact forces recorded were 381.81±48.51m/s<sup>2</sup>, 380.53±50.47m/s<sup>2</sup>, and 380.04±53.70m/s<sup>2</sup>, with no significant effect of string tension on impact force. …”
-
3680
The participants information.
Published 2025“…The impact forces recorded were 381.81±48.51m/s<sup>2</sup>, 380.53±50.47m/s<sup>2</sup>, and 380.04±53.70m/s<sup>2</sup>, with no significant effect of string tension on impact force. …”