Showing 1,101 - 1,120 results of 21,342 for search '(( significant decrease decrease ) OR ( significantly impact decrease ))', query time: 0.55s Refine Results
  1. 1101
  2. 1102
  3. 1103
  4. 1104
  5. 1105
  6. 1106
  7. 1107
  8. 1108
  9. 1109
  10. 1110
  11. 1111
  12. 1112
  13. 1113

    CaCl<sub>2</sub> and MnCl<sub>2</sub> treatment significantly reduced Pol I occupancy on the rDNA template. by Abigail K. Huffines (20721555)

    Published 2025
    “…If the <i>p</i>-value < 0.05, that was deemed a significant difference between the two treatment groups and was indicated with either a green (increased occupancy) or black (decreased occupancy) line below the histogram for the CaCl<sub>2</sub> treated samples with respect to the untreated samples. …”
  14. 1114
  15. 1115

    Preference for the EIA – conjoint results. by Mehdi Mourali (10170245)

    Published 2025
    “…A randomized conjoint experiment and a follow-up choice experiment revealed that support for the EIAs decreased sharply as their accuracy gap grew, although impact parity was prioritized more when ETAs produced large outcome discrepancies. …”
  16. 1116

    Marginal means – Pooled across scenarios. by Mehdi Mourali (10170245)

    Published 2025
    “…A randomized conjoint experiment and a follow-up choice experiment revealed that support for the EIAs decreased sharply as their accuracy gap grew, although impact parity was prioritized more when ETAs produced large outcome discrepancies. …”
  17. 1117

    Sample attribute table. by Mehdi Mourali (10170245)

    Published 2025
    “…A randomized conjoint experiment and a follow-up choice experiment revealed that support for the EIAs decreased sharply as their accuracy gap grew, although impact parity was prioritized more when ETAs produced large outcome discrepancies. …”
  18. 1118

    Subgroup analysis – Political affiliation. by Mehdi Mourali (10170245)

    Published 2025
    “…A randomized conjoint experiment and a follow-up choice experiment revealed that support for the EIAs decreased sharply as their accuracy gap grew, although impact parity was prioritized more when ETAs produced large outcome discrepancies. …”
  19. 1119

    Sample scenario description. by Mehdi Mourali (10170245)

    Published 2025
    “…A randomized conjoint experiment and a follow-up choice experiment revealed that support for the EIAs decreased sharply as their accuracy gap grew, although impact parity was prioritized more when ETAs produced large outcome discrepancies. …”
  20. 1120

    AMCEs – Pooled across scenarios. by Mehdi Mourali (10170245)

    Published 2025
    “…A randomized conjoint experiment and a follow-up choice experiment revealed that support for the EIAs decreased sharply as their accuracy gap grew, although impact parity was prioritized more when ETAs produced large outcome discrepancies. …”