Search alternatives:
significant decrease » significant increase (Expand Search), significantly increased (Expand Search)
significantly impact » significant impact (Expand Search), significantly improve (Expand Search), significantly improved (Expand Search)
significant decrease » significant increase (Expand Search), significantly increased (Expand Search)
significantly impact » significant impact (Expand Search), significantly improve (Expand Search), significantly improved (Expand Search)
-
1101
-
1102
-
1103
-
1104
-
1105
-
1106
-
1107
-
1108
-
1109
-
1110
-
1111
-
1112
-
1113
CaCl<sub>2</sub> and MnCl<sub>2</sub> treatment significantly reduced Pol I occupancy on the rDNA template.
Published 2025“…If the <i>p</i>-value < 0.05, that was deemed a significant difference between the two treatment groups and was indicated with either a green (increased occupancy) or black (decreased occupancy) line below the histogram for the CaCl<sub>2</sub> treated samples with respect to the untreated samples. …”
-
1114
-
1115
Preference for the EIA – conjoint results.
Published 2025“…A randomized conjoint experiment and a follow-up choice experiment revealed that support for the EIAs decreased sharply as their accuracy gap grew, although impact parity was prioritized more when ETAs produced large outcome discrepancies. …”
-
1116
Marginal means – Pooled across scenarios.
Published 2025“…A randomized conjoint experiment and a follow-up choice experiment revealed that support for the EIAs decreased sharply as their accuracy gap grew, although impact parity was prioritized more when ETAs produced large outcome discrepancies. …”
-
1117
Sample attribute table.
Published 2025“…A randomized conjoint experiment and a follow-up choice experiment revealed that support for the EIAs decreased sharply as their accuracy gap grew, although impact parity was prioritized more when ETAs produced large outcome discrepancies. …”
-
1118
Subgroup analysis – Political affiliation.
Published 2025“…A randomized conjoint experiment and a follow-up choice experiment revealed that support for the EIAs decreased sharply as their accuracy gap grew, although impact parity was prioritized more when ETAs produced large outcome discrepancies. …”
-
1119
Sample scenario description.
Published 2025“…A randomized conjoint experiment and a follow-up choice experiment revealed that support for the EIAs decreased sharply as their accuracy gap grew, although impact parity was prioritized more when ETAs produced large outcome discrepancies. …”
-
1120
AMCEs – Pooled across scenarios.
Published 2025“…A randomized conjoint experiment and a follow-up choice experiment revealed that support for the EIAs decreased sharply as their accuracy gap grew, although impact parity was prioritized more when ETAs produced large outcome discrepancies. …”