Geometry and structure of the MIMO mobile terminal antenna. by Wen-Ying Zhou (10049543)

Subjects:

SAR distribution in the skull comparison before and after antenna miniaturized (Unit: W/kg). by Wen-Ying Zhou (10049543)

Subjects:

Radiation patterns at1.9 GHz, 2.1 GHz, 2.6 GHz, and 3.5 GHz. by Wen-Ying Zhou (10049543)

Subjects:

SAR distribution in the scalp comparison before and after antenna miniaturized (Unit: W/kg). by Wen-Ying Zhou (10049543)

Subjects:

Age-standardized prevalence rates of gynecological diseases across 204 countries and territories in 2021. by Xiaofeng He (2618752)

Subjects:

Age-standardized prevalence rates of gynecological diseases across 21 GBD regions, by SDI, from 1990 to 2021. by Xiaofeng He (2618752)

Subjects:

Estimated annual percentage change in age-standardized prevalence rates of gynecological diseases across 204 countries and territories in 2021. by Xiaofeng He (2618752)

Subjects:

Prevalence and trends of gynecological diseases (GDs) among women of childbearing age, by age group and SDI. by Xiaofeng He (2618752)

Subjects:

Estimated annual percentage changes in the prevalence rate of specific gynecological diseases from 1990 to 2021, categorized by age group and SDI. by Xiaofeng He (2618752)

Subjects:

Prevalence of gynecological diseases (GDs) among women of childbearing age in 2021, along with their changes from 1990 to 2021, and the contribution of each GD to the overall preva... by Xiaofeng He (2618752)

Subjects:

The global prevalence of gynecological diseases among women aged 15-49 years in 1990 and 2021, along with the trends and changes observed between these years. by Xiaofeng He (2618752)

Subjects:

Subgroup analysis of AIP and depression. by Siyi Deng (12887198)

Subjects:

Preference for the EIA – conjoint results. by Mehdi Mourali (10170245)

“…A randomized conjoint experiment and a follow-up choice experiment revealed that support for the EIAs decreased sharply as their accuracy gap grew, although impact parity was prioritized more when ETAs produced large outcome discrepancies. …”

Marginal means – Pooled across scenarios. by Mehdi Mourali (10170245)

“…A randomized conjoint experiment and a follow-up choice experiment revealed that support for the EIAs decreased sharply as their accuracy gap grew, although impact parity was prioritized more when ETAs produced large outcome discrepancies. …”

Sample attribute table. by Mehdi Mourali (10170245)

“…A randomized conjoint experiment and a follow-up choice experiment revealed that support for the EIAs decreased sharply as their accuracy gap grew, although impact parity was prioritized more when ETAs produced large outcome discrepancies. …”

Subgroup analysis – Political affiliation. by Mehdi Mourali (10170245)

“…A randomized conjoint experiment and a follow-up choice experiment revealed that support for the EIAs decreased sharply as their accuracy gap grew, although impact parity was prioritized more when ETAs produced large outcome discrepancies. …”

Sample scenario description. by Mehdi Mourali (10170245)

“…A randomized conjoint experiment and a follow-up choice experiment revealed that support for the EIAs decreased sharply as their accuracy gap grew, although impact parity was prioritized more when ETAs produced large outcome discrepancies. …”

AMCEs – Pooled across scenarios. by Mehdi Mourali (10170245)

“…A randomized conjoint experiment and a follow-up choice experiment revealed that support for the EIAs decreased sharply as their accuracy gap grew, although impact parity was prioritized more when ETAs produced large outcome discrepancies. …”

Methodological flowchart. by Mehdi Mourali (10170245)

“…A randomized conjoint experiment and a follow-up choice experiment revealed that support for the EIAs decreased sharply as their accuracy gap grew, although impact parity was prioritized more when ETAs produced large outcome discrepancies. …”

Preference for the EIA vs. ETA across scenarios. by Mehdi Mourali (10170245)

“…A randomized conjoint experiment and a follow-up choice experiment revealed that support for the EIAs decreased sharply as their accuracy gap grew, although impact parity was prioritized more when ETAs produced large outcome discrepancies. …”