Search alternatives:
significantly impaired » significantly impairs (Expand Search), significantly improved (Expand Search), significantly improve (Expand Search)
significant decrease » significant increase (Expand Search), significantly increased (Expand Search)
impaired decrease » marked decrease (Expand Search)
significantly impaired » significantly impairs (Expand Search), significantly improved (Expand Search), significantly improve (Expand Search)
significant decrease » significant increase (Expand Search), significantly increased (Expand Search)
impaired decrease » marked decrease (Expand Search)
-
761
-
762
-
763
-
764
-
765
SAR distribution in the cerebellum comparison before and after antenna miniaturized (Unit: W/kg).
Published 2025Subjects: -
766
-
767
-
768
SAR distribution in the brainstem comparison before and after antenna miniaturized (Unit: W/kg).
Published 2025Subjects: -
769
-
770
Simulated and measured S-parameters comparison of miniaturized MIMO mobile terminal antenna.
Published 2025Subjects: -
771
-
772
-
773
SAR distribution in the skull comparison before and after antenna miniaturized (Unit: W/kg).
Published 2025Subjects: -
774
-
775
SAR distribution in the scalp comparison before and after antenna miniaturized (Unit: W/kg).
Published 2025Subjects: -
776
Pre-RT and post RT D-dimer levels in associated with prognostic significance.
Published 2025Subjects: -
777
Increased or reduced ATGL-1 activity does not significantly change <i>N. parisii</i> growth.
Published 2025Subjects: -
778
-
779
Emotional stimulation test.
Published 2025“…</p><p>Results</p><p>A higher correction rate of unpleasant facial emotional perception—defined as the proportion of emotional stimuli (positive, negative, and neutral expressions) interpreted as unpleasant—was significantly associated with reduced HRV, as evidenced by lower high-frequency (HF) power and decreased standard deviation of normal-to-normal intervals (SDNN). …”
-
780
Average % peptides counts for different classes of proteins at different germination time points and significant p-value indicated as compared to soaked sample (*p< 0.05, **p<0.01, ***p<0.001) for brown non-trypsinised with shades of green showing increase and red showing decrease with respect to soaked.
Published 2024“…<p>Average % peptides counts for different classes of proteins at different germination time points and significant p-value indicated as compared to soaked sample (*p< 0.05, **p<0.01, ***p<0.001) for brown non-trypsinised with shades of green showing increase and red showing decrease with respect to soaked.…”