Search alternatives:
significantly improve » significantly improved (Expand Search)
significant decrease » significant increase (Expand Search), significantly increased (Expand Search)
improve decrease » improve disease (Expand Search), improved urease (Expand Search), improves disease (Expand Search)
significantly improve » significantly improved (Expand Search)
significant decrease » significant increase (Expand Search), significantly increased (Expand Search)
improve decrease » improve disease (Expand Search), improved urease (Expand Search), improves disease (Expand Search)
-
3301
Table 1_Cervical cancer burden and attributable risk factors across different age and regions from 1990 to 2021 and future burden prediction: results from the global burden of dise...
Published 2025“…The risk factors, which included unsafe sex and smoke, significantly varied by region. The global ASIR exhibited a downward trend from 2021 to 2035.…”
-
3302
Data Sheet 1_Evaluating the global, regional, and national burden of congenital heart disease in infants younger than 1 year: a 1990–2021 systematic analysis for the GBD study 2021...
Published 2025“…By 2021, its mortality rates had decreased to the eighth leading cause of death.</p>Interpretation<p>CHD remains a significant and rapidly escalating global challenge in child health. …”
-
3303
Data Sheet 2_Evaluating the global, regional, and national burden of congenital heart disease in infants younger than 1 year: a 1990–2021 systematic analysis for the GBD study 2021...
Published 2025“…By 2021, its mortality rates had decreased to the eighth leading cause of death.</p>Interpretation<p>CHD remains a significant and rapidly escalating global challenge in child health. …”
-
3304
DataSheet1_A lightweight MHDI-DETR model for detecting grape leaf diseases.pdf
Published 2024“…The original residual backbone network was improved using the MobileNetv4 network, significantly reducing the model’s computational requirements and complexity. …”
-
3305
Image 5_Unexpected estradiol decline during ovarian stimulation monitoring affects cumulative live birth.png
Published 2025“…In both unmatched and matched cohorts, the CLBRs were significantly decreased (unmatched cohort: 66.3% versus 55%, P<0.001, adjusted OR 0.83, 95% CI: 0.76,0.91; matched cohort: 59% versus 55%, P = 0.003, adjusted OR 0.84, 95%CI: 0.75,0.94). …”
-
3306
Image 9_Unexpected estradiol decline during ovarian stimulation monitoring affects cumulative live birth.tiff
Published 2025“…In both unmatched and matched cohorts, the CLBRs were significantly decreased (unmatched cohort: 66.3% versus 55%, P<0.001, adjusted OR 0.83, 95% CI: 0.76,0.91; matched cohort: 59% versus 55%, P = 0.003, adjusted OR 0.84, 95%CI: 0.75,0.94). …”
-
3307
Image 1_Unexpected estradiol decline during ovarian stimulation monitoring affects cumulative live birth.jpeg
Published 2025“…In both unmatched and matched cohorts, the CLBRs were significantly decreased (unmatched cohort: 66.3% versus 55%, P<0.001, adjusted OR 0.83, 95% CI: 0.76,0.91; matched cohort: 59% versus 55%, P = 0.003, adjusted OR 0.84, 95%CI: 0.75,0.94). …”
-
3308
Image 2_Unexpected estradiol decline during ovarian stimulation monitoring affects cumulative live birth.tiff
Published 2025“…In both unmatched and matched cohorts, the CLBRs were significantly decreased (unmatched cohort: 66.3% versus 55%, P<0.001, adjusted OR 0.83, 95% CI: 0.76,0.91; matched cohort: 59% versus 55%, P = 0.003, adjusted OR 0.84, 95%CI: 0.75,0.94). …”
-
3309
Image 8_Unexpected estradiol decline during ovarian stimulation monitoring affects cumulative live birth.tiff
Published 2025“…In both unmatched and matched cohorts, the CLBRs were significantly decreased (unmatched cohort: 66.3% versus 55%, P<0.001, adjusted OR 0.83, 95% CI: 0.76,0.91; matched cohort: 59% versus 55%, P = 0.003, adjusted OR 0.84, 95%CI: 0.75,0.94). …”
-
3310
Image 7_Unexpected estradiol decline during ovarian stimulation monitoring affects cumulative live birth.tiff
Published 2025“…In both unmatched and matched cohorts, the CLBRs were significantly decreased (unmatched cohort: 66.3% versus 55%, P<0.001, adjusted OR 0.83, 95% CI: 0.76,0.91; matched cohort: 59% versus 55%, P = 0.003, adjusted OR 0.84, 95%CI: 0.75,0.94). …”
-
3311
Image 10_Unexpected estradiol decline during ovarian stimulation monitoring affects cumulative live birth.tiff
Published 2025“…In both unmatched and matched cohorts, the CLBRs were significantly decreased (unmatched cohort: 66.3% versus 55%, P<0.001, adjusted OR 0.83, 95% CI: 0.76,0.91; matched cohort: 59% versus 55%, P = 0.003, adjusted OR 0.84, 95%CI: 0.75,0.94). …”
-
3312
Image 4_Unexpected estradiol decline during ovarian stimulation monitoring affects cumulative live birth.tiff
Published 2025“…In both unmatched and matched cohorts, the CLBRs were significantly decreased (unmatched cohort: 66.3% versus 55%, P<0.001, adjusted OR 0.83, 95% CI: 0.76,0.91; matched cohort: 59% versus 55%, P = 0.003, adjusted OR 0.84, 95%CI: 0.75,0.94). …”
-
3313
Image 6_Unexpected estradiol decline during ovarian stimulation monitoring affects cumulative live birth.tiff
Published 2025“…In both unmatched and matched cohorts, the CLBRs were significantly decreased (unmatched cohort: 66.3% versus 55%, P<0.001, adjusted OR 0.83, 95% CI: 0.76,0.91; matched cohort: 59% versus 55%, P = 0.003, adjusted OR 0.84, 95%CI: 0.75,0.94). …”
-
3314
Image 3_Unexpected estradiol decline during ovarian stimulation monitoring affects cumulative live birth.tiff
Published 2025“…In both unmatched and matched cohorts, the CLBRs were significantly decreased (unmatched cohort: 66.3% versus 55%, P<0.001, adjusted OR 0.83, 95% CI: 0.76,0.91; matched cohort: 59% versus 55%, P = 0.003, adjusted OR 0.84, 95%CI: 0.75,0.94). …”
-
3315
Overview design of F-TransR model architecture.
Published 2025“…On the Reddit dataset, MSE and MAPE decrease by 6.6% and 5.3%, respectively, and improves to 0.854. …”
-
3316
Table 1_Effects of bio-nano-selenium on wheat grain morphology, selenium transport enrichment and antioxidant enzyme activities.docx
Published 2025“…In summary, bio-nano-selenium is expected to be an effective tool for selenium biofortification of wheat, which not only significantly increases the selenium content of grains but also improves yields, stress tolerance, and fertilizer utilization, providing a potential solution to selenium deficiency through dietary solutions, while contributing to the sustainable development of agriculture.…”
-
3317
F-TransR experimental effect diagram.
Published 2025“…On the Reddit dataset, MSE and MAPE decrease by 6.6% and 5.3%, respectively, and improves to 0.854. …”
-
3318
F-TransR rendering after removing some modules.
Published 2025“…On the Reddit dataset, MSE and MAPE decrease by 6.6% and 5.3%, respectively, and improves to 0.854. …”
-
3319
Data Sheet 1_The effect of repetitive and Deep Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation on quantitative electroencephalography in major depressive disorder.pdf
Published 2025“…Patients who exhibited lower alpha activity in the left fronto-central region and higher gamma activity in the right prefrontal region following rTMS showed more significant improvements in depression symptoms. Similarly, those whose beta activity increased in the left prefrontal region but decreased in the right prefrontal region after rTMS tended to have greater reductions in depression and anxiety severity. …”
-
3320
Data Sheet 1_Enabling immune checkpoint blockade efficacy in T-lymphopenia by restoring CD8 T cell dynamics with IL-7 cytokine therapy.docx
Published 2024“…The combination of rhIL-7-hyFc and anti-PD-1 therapy resulted in significant tumor regression and improved mouse survival.…”