Search alternatives:
significantly improve » significantly improved (Expand Search)
significant decrease » significant increase (Expand Search), significantly increased (Expand Search)
improve decrease » improve disease (Expand Search), improved urease (Expand Search), improves disease (Expand Search)
significantly improve » significantly improved (Expand Search)
significant decrease » significant increase (Expand Search), significantly increased (Expand Search)
improve decrease » improve disease (Expand Search), improved urease (Expand Search), improves disease (Expand Search)
-
1621
IDA flowchart.
Published 2025“…The optimization of anisotropic nodes significantly enhances the seismic performance of shear walls. …”
-
1622
Ablation test results of QIMPN-PCA-DC model.
Published 2025“…The optimization of anisotropic nodes significantly enhances the seismic performance of shear walls. …”
-
1623
QIMPN framework diagram.
Published 2025“…The optimization of anisotropic nodes significantly enhances the seismic performance of shear walls. …”
-
1624
Multiple indicator test results.
Published 2025“…The optimization of anisotropic nodes significantly enhances the seismic performance of shear walls. …”
-
1625
I/L type node quality entity type.
Published 2025“…The optimization of anisotropic nodes significantly enhances the seismic performance of shear walls. …”
-
1626
Testing function diagram of QIMPN-PCA-DC.
Published 2025“…The optimization of anisotropic nodes significantly enhances the seismic performance of shear walls. …”
-
1627
Node coding process.
Published 2025“…The optimization of anisotropic nodes significantly enhances the seismic performance of shear walls. …”
-
1628
MGPC module.
Published 2025“…Experimental results indicate that at a pruning level of 1.5, mAP@0.5 and mAP@0.5:0.95 improved by 3.9% and 4.6%, respectively, while computational load decreased by 21% and parameter count dropped by 53%. …”
-
1629
Comparative experiment.
Published 2025“…Experimental results indicate that at a pruning level of 1.5, mAP@0.5 and mAP@0.5:0.95 improved by 3.9% and 4.6%, respectively, while computational load decreased by 21% and parameter count dropped by 53%. …”
-
1630
Pruning experiment.
Published 2025“…Experimental results indicate that at a pruning level of 1.5, mAP@0.5 and mAP@0.5:0.95 improved by 3.9% and 4.6%, respectively, while computational load decreased by 21% and parameter count dropped by 53%. …”
-
1631
Parameter setting table.
Published 2025“…Experimental results indicate that at a pruning level of 1.5, mAP@0.5 and mAP@0.5:0.95 improved by 3.9% and 4.6%, respectively, while computational load decreased by 21% and parameter count dropped by 53%. …”
-
1632
DTADH module.
Published 2025“…Experimental results indicate that at a pruning level of 1.5, mAP@0.5 and mAP@0.5:0.95 improved by 3.9% and 4.6%, respectively, while computational load decreased by 21% and parameter count dropped by 53%. …”
-
1633
Ablation experiment.
Published 2025“…Experimental results indicate that at a pruning level of 1.5, mAP@0.5 and mAP@0.5:0.95 improved by 3.9% and 4.6%, respectively, while computational load decreased by 21% and parameter count dropped by 53%. …”
-
1634
Multi scale detection.
Published 2025“…Experimental results indicate that at a pruning level of 1.5, mAP@0.5 and mAP@0.5:0.95 improved by 3.9% and 4.6%, respectively, while computational load decreased by 21% and parameter count dropped by 53%. …”
-
1635
MFDPN module.
Published 2025“…Experimental results indicate that at a pruning level of 1.5, mAP@0.5 and mAP@0.5:0.95 improved by 3.9% and 4.6%, respectively, while computational load decreased by 21% and parameter count dropped by 53%. …”
-
1636
Detection effect of different sizes.
Published 2025“…Experimental results indicate that at a pruning level of 1.5, mAP@0.5 and mAP@0.5:0.95 improved by 3.9% and 4.6%, respectively, while computational load decreased by 21% and parameter count dropped by 53%. …”
-
1637
Radar chart comparing indicators.
Published 2025“…Experimental results indicate that at a pruning level of 1.5, mAP@0.5 and mAP@0.5:0.95 improved by 3.9% and 4.6%, respectively, while computational load decreased by 21% and parameter count dropped by 53%. …”
-
1638
MFD-YOLO structure.
Published 2025“…Experimental results indicate that at a pruning level of 1.5, mAP@0.5 and mAP@0.5:0.95 improved by 3.9% and 4.6%, respectively, while computational load decreased by 21% and parameter count dropped by 53%. …”
-
1639
Detection results of each category.
Published 2025“…Experimental results indicate that at a pruning level of 1.5, mAP@0.5 and mAP@0.5:0.95 improved by 3.9% and 4.6%, respectively, while computational load decreased by 21% and parameter count dropped by 53%. …”
-
1640
Data Sheet 1_Statistics and behavior of clinically significant extra-pulmonary vein atrial fibrillation sources: machine-learning-enhanced electrographic flow mapping in persistent...
Published 2025“…Notably, the majority of significant sources were not continuously active; however, when these sources switched “ON,” the spatial variability of AF cycle lengths in the respective atrium decreased by more than 50%, suggesting an entraining effect.…”