Showing 1,621 - 1,640 results of 5,501 for search '(( significant decrease decrease ) OR ( significantly improve decrease ))~', query time: 0.34s Refine Results
  1. 1621

    IDA flowchart. by Jun Zhao (59250)

    Published 2025
    “…The optimization of anisotropic nodes significantly enhances the seismic performance of shear walls. …”
  2. 1622

    Ablation test results of QIMPN-PCA-DC model. by Jun Zhao (59250)

    Published 2025
    “…The optimization of anisotropic nodes significantly enhances the seismic performance of shear walls. …”
  3. 1623

    QIMPN framework diagram. by Jun Zhao (59250)

    Published 2025
    “…The optimization of anisotropic nodes significantly enhances the seismic performance of shear walls. …”
  4. 1624

    Multiple indicator test results. by Jun Zhao (59250)

    Published 2025
    “…The optimization of anisotropic nodes significantly enhances the seismic performance of shear walls. …”
  5. 1625

    I/L type node quality entity type. by Jun Zhao (59250)

    Published 2025
    “…The optimization of anisotropic nodes significantly enhances the seismic performance of shear walls. …”
  6. 1626

    Testing function diagram of QIMPN-PCA-DC. by Jun Zhao (59250)

    Published 2025
    “…The optimization of anisotropic nodes significantly enhances the seismic performance of shear walls. …”
  7. 1627

    Node coding process. by Jun Zhao (59250)

    Published 2025
    “…The optimization of anisotropic nodes significantly enhances the seismic performance of shear walls. …”
  8. 1628

    MGPC module. by Bo Tong (2138632)

    Published 2025
    “…Experimental results indicate that at a pruning level of 1.5, mAP@0.5 and mAP@0.5:0.95 improved by 3.9% and 4.6%, respectively, while computational load decreased by 21% and parameter count dropped by 53%. …”
  9. 1629

    Comparative experiment. by Bo Tong (2138632)

    Published 2025
    “…Experimental results indicate that at a pruning level of 1.5, mAP@0.5 and mAP@0.5:0.95 improved by 3.9% and 4.6%, respectively, while computational load decreased by 21% and parameter count dropped by 53%. …”
  10. 1630

    Pruning experiment. by Bo Tong (2138632)

    Published 2025
    “…Experimental results indicate that at a pruning level of 1.5, mAP@0.5 and mAP@0.5:0.95 improved by 3.9% and 4.6%, respectively, while computational load decreased by 21% and parameter count dropped by 53%. …”
  11. 1631

    Parameter setting table. by Bo Tong (2138632)

    Published 2025
    “…Experimental results indicate that at a pruning level of 1.5, mAP@0.5 and mAP@0.5:0.95 improved by 3.9% and 4.6%, respectively, while computational load decreased by 21% and parameter count dropped by 53%. …”
  12. 1632

    DTADH module. by Bo Tong (2138632)

    Published 2025
    “…Experimental results indicate that at a pruning level of 1.5, mAP@0.5 and mAP@0.5:0.95 improved by 3.9% and 4.6%, respectively, while computational load decreased by 21% and parameter count dropped by 53%. …”
  13. 1633

    Ablation experiment. by Bo Tong (2138632)

    Published 2025
    “…Experimental results indicate that at a pruning level of 1.5, mAP@0.5 and mAP@0.5:0.95 improved by 3.9% and 4.6%, respectively, while computational load decreased by 21% and parameter count dropped by 53%. …”
  14. 1634

    Multi scale detection. by Bo Tong (2138632)

    Published 2025
    “…Experimental results indicate that at a pruning level of 1.5, mAP@0.5 and mAP@0.5:0.95 improved by 3.9% and 4.6%, respectively, while computational load decreased by 21% and parameter count dropped by 53%. …”
  15. 1635

    MFDPN module. by Bo Tong (2138632)

    Published 2025
    “…Experimental results indicate that at a pruning level of 1.5, mAP@0.5 and mAP@0.5:0.95 improved by 3.9% and 4.6%, respectively, while computational load decreased by 21% and parameter count dropped by 53%. …”
  16. 1636

    Detection effect of different sizes. by Bo Tong (2138632)

    Published 2025
    “…Experimental results indicate that at a pruning level of 1.5, mAP@0.5 and mAP@0.5:0.95 improved by 3.9% and 4.6%, respectively, while computational load decreased by 21% and parameter count dropped by 53%. …”
  17. 1637

    Radar chart comparing indicators. by Bo Tong (2138632)

    Published 2025
    “…Experimental results indicate that at a pruning level of 1.5, mAP@0.5 and mAP@0.5:0.95 improved by 3.9% and 4.6%, respectively, while computational load decreased by 21% and parameter count dropped by 53%. …”
  18. 1638

    MFD-YOLO structure. by Bo Tong (2138632)

    Published 2025
    “…Experimental results indicate that at a pruning level of 1.5, mAP@0.5 and mAP@0.5:0.95 improved by 3.9% and 4.6%, respectively, while computational load decreased by 21% and parameter count dropped by 53%. …”
  19. 1639

    Detection results of each category. by Bo Tong (2138632)

    Published 2025
    “…Experimental results indicate that at a pruning level of 1.5, mAP@0.5 and mAP@0.5:0.95 improved by 3.9% and 4.6%, respectively, while computational load decreased by 21% and parameter count dropped by 53%. …”
  20. 1640

    Data Sheet 1_Statistics and behavior of clinically significant extra-pulmonary vein atrial fibrillation sources: machine-learning-enhanced electrographic flow mapping in persistent... by Peter Ruppersberg (22123543)

    Published 2025
    “…Notably, the majority of significant sources were not continuously active; however, when these sources switched “ON,” the spatial variability of AF cycle lengths in the respective atrium decreased by more than 50%, suggesting an entraining effect.…”