Showing 1,841 - 1,860 results of 5,501 for search '(( significant decrease decrease ) OR ( significantly improved decrease ))~', query time: 0.53s Refine Results
  1. 1841

    Variables used for the analysis. by Yaw Nyarko Opoku-Boateng (20477302)

    Published 2024
    “…</p><p>Results</p><p>The results indicate that Covid-19 had a significant impact on healthcare utilization in Ghana. …”
  2. 1842

    Trend of PNC attendance over the period. by Yaw Nyarko Opoku-Boateng (20477302)

    Published 2024
    “…</p><p>Results</p><p>The results indicate that Covid-19 had a significant impact on healthcare utilization in Ghana. …”
  3. 1843

    Trend of ANC attendance over the period. by Yaw Nyarko Opoku-Boateng (20477302)

    Published 2024
    “…</p><p>Results</p><p>The results indicate that Covid-19 had a significant impact on healthcare utilization in Ghana. …”
  4. 1844

    Total hospital attendances by specialty. by Yaw Nyarko Opoku-Boateng (20477302)

    Published 2024
    “…</p><p>Results</p><p>The results indicate that Covid-19 had a significant impact on healthcare utilization in Ghana. …”
  5. 1845

    Pre- & post awareness session scores. by Stavia Turyahabwe (9925935)

    Published 2025
    “…</p><p>Results</p><p>There was a significant improvement (<i>p</i><0.01) in knowledge and awareness levels of community members post the AGB exercises which included creating awareness using digital storytelling, house visits and more. …”
  6. 1846

    VOT vs DOTS TB treatment adherence rates. by Stavia Turyahabwe (9925935)

    Published 2025
    “…</p><p>Results</p><p>There was a significant improvement (<i>p</i><0.01) in knowledge and awareness levels of community members post the AGB exercises which included creating awareness using digital storytelling, house visits and more. …”
  7. 1847

    Sample size and duration of the pilot study. by Stavia Turyahabwe (9925935)

    Published 2025
    “…</p><p>Results</p><p>There was a significant improvement (<i>p</i><0.01) in knowledge and awareness levels of community members post the AGB exercises which included creating awareness using digital storytelling, house visits and more. …”
  8. 1848

    Kinetic characteristics. by Tao Yuan (443733)

    Published 2025
    “…</p><p>Results</p><p>KT significantly improved the Y-balance anterior reach distance (<i>P = 0</i>.…”
  9. 1849

    Raw data. by Tao Yuan (443733)

    Published 2025
    “…</p><p>Results</p><p>KT significantly improved the Y-balance anterior reach distance (<i>P = 0</i>.…”
  10. 1850

    Schematic of the Y-balance anterior task. by Tao Yuan (443733)

    Published 2025
    “…</p><p>Results</p><p>KT significantly improved the Y-balance anterior reach distance (<i>P = 0</i>.…”
  11. 1851

    Demographic characteristics of the two groups. by Tao Yuan (443733)

    Published 2025
    “…</p><p>Results</p><p>KT significantly improved the Y-balance anterior reach distance (<i>P = 0</i>.…”
  12. 1852

    GRADE judgements. by Da Huang (1306407)

    Published 2025
    “…The study results demonstrated that physical exercise combined with conventional rehabilitation significantly improved VO<sub>2Peak</sub> (MD = 4.91, 95% CI: 3.52–6.29, P < 0.001), 6MWT (MD = 37.11, 95% CI: 11.72–62.51, P = 0.004), FVC% (MD = 6.54, 95% CI: 4.9–8.17, P < 0.001), and FEV<sub>1</sub>% (MD = 8.27, 95% CI: 7.39–9.14, P < 0.001) in burn patients compared to conventional rehabilitation. …”
  13. 1853

    Basic characteristics of the included studies. by Da Huang (1306407)

    Published 2025
    “…The study results demonstrated that physical exercise combined with conventional rehabilitation significantly improved VO<sub>2Peak</sub> (MD = 4.91, 95% CI: 3.52–6.29, P < 0.001), 6MWT (MD = 37.11, 95% CI: 11.72–62.51, P = 0.004), FVC% (MD = 6.54, 95% CI: 4.9–8.17, P < 0.001), and FEV<sub>1</sub>% (MD = 8.27, 95% CI: 7.39–9.14, P < 0.001) in burn patients compared to conventional rehabilitation. …”
  14. 1854

    The data of meta-analysis. by Da Huang (1306407)

    Published 2025
    “…The study results demonstrated that physical exercise combined with conventional rehabilitation significantly improved VO<sub>2Peak</sub> (MD = 4.91, 95% CI: 3.52–6.29, P < 0.001), 6MWT (MD = 37.11, 95% CI: 11.72–62.51, P = 0.004), FVC% (MD = 6.54, 95% CI: 4.9–8.17, P < 0.001), and FEV<sub>1</sub>% (MD = 8.27, 95% CI: 7.39–9.14, P < 0.001) in burn patients compared to conventional rehabilitation. …”
  15. 1855

    Risk of bias. by Da Huang (1306407)

    Published 2025
    “…The study results demonstrated that physical exercise combined with conventional rehabilitation significantly improved VO<sub>2Peak</sub> (MD = 4.91, 95% CI: 3.52–6.29, P < 0.001), 6MWT (MD = 37.11, 95% CI: 11.72–62.51, P = 0.004), FVC% (MD = 6.54, 95% CI: 4.9–8.17, P < 0.001), and FEV<sub>1</sub>% (MD = 8.27, 95% CI: 7.39–9.14, P < 0.001) in burn patients compared to conventional rehabilitation. …”
  16. 1856

    Overall risk of bias assessment. by Da Huang (1306407)

    Published 2025
    “…The study results demonstrated that physical exercise combined with conventional rehabilitation significantly improved VO<sub>2Peak</sub> (MD = 4.91, 95% CI: 3.52–6.29, P < 0.001), 6MWT (MD = 37.11, 95% CI: 11.72–62.51, P = 0.004), FVC% (MD = 6.54, 95% CI: 4.9–8.17, P < 0.001), and FEV<sub>1</sub>% (MD = 8.27, 95% CI: 7.39–9.14, P < 0.001) in burn patients compared to conventional rehabilitation. …”
  17. 1857

    Funnel plot of VO<sub>2Peak</sub> inclusion studies. by Da Huang (1306407)

    Published 2025
    “…The study results demonstrated that physical exercise combined with conventional rehabilitation significantly improved VO<sub>2Peak</sub> (MD = 4.91, 95% CI: 3.52–6.29, P < 0.001), 6MWT (MD = 37.11, 95% CI: 11.72–62.51, P = 0.004), FVC% (MD = 6.54, 95% CI: 4.9–8.17, P < 0.001), and FEV<sub>1</sub>% (MD = 8.27, 95% CI: 7.39–9.14, P < 0.001) in burn patients compared to conventional rehabilitation. …”
  18. 1858

    Analysis of subgroups. by Da Huang (1306407)

    Published 2025
    “…The study results demonstrated that physical exercise combined with conventional rehabilitation significantly improved VO<sub>2Peak</sub> (MD = 4.91, 95% CI: 3.52–6.29, P < 0.001), 6MWT (MD = 37.11, 95% CI: 11.72–62.51, P = 0.004), FVC% (MD = 6.54, 95% CI: 4.9–8.17, P < 0.001), and FEV<sub>1</sub>% (MD = 8.27, 95% CI: 7.39–9.14, P < 0.001) in burn patients compared to conventional rehabilitation. …”
  19. 1859

    Overall model framework. by Ke Yan (331581)

    Published 2024
    “…The results show that: (1) From the experimental data of word sense disambiguation, the accuracy of the SMOSS-LSTM model proposed in this paper is the lowest when the context range is "3+3", then it rises in turn at "5+5" and "7+7", reaches the highest at "7+7", and then begins to decrease at "10+10"; (2) Compared with the control group, the accuracy of syntactic analysis in the experimental group reached 89.5%, while that in the control group was only 73.2%. (3) In the aspect of English text error detection, the detection accuracy of the proposed model in the experimental group is as high as 94.8%, which is significantly better than the traditional SMOSS-based text error detection method, and its accuracy is only 68.3%. (4) Compared with other existing researches, although it is slightly inferior to Bidirectional Encoder Representations from Transformers (BERT) in word sense disambiguation, this proposed model performs well in syntactic analysis and English text error detection, and its comprehensive performance is excellent. …”
  20. 1860

    Key parameters of LSTM training model. by Ke Yan (331581)

    Published 2024
    “…The results show that: (1) From the experimental data of word sense disambiguation, the accuracy of the SMOSS-LSTM model proposed in this paper is the lowest when the context range is "3+3", then it rises in turn at "5+5" and "7+7", reaches the highest at "7+7", and then begins to decrease at "10+10"; (2) Compared with the control group, the accuracy of syntactic analysis in the experimental group reached 89.5%, while that in the control group was only 73.2%. (3) In the aspect of English text error detection, the detection accuracy of the proposed model in the experimental group is as high as 94.8%, which is significantly better than the traditional SMOSS-based text error detection method, and its accuracy is only 68.3%. (4) Compared with other existing researches, although it is slightly inferior to Bidirectional Encoder Representations from Transformers (BERT) in word sense disambiguation, this proposed model performs well in syntactic analysis and English text error detection, and its comprehensive performance is excellent. …”