Search alternatives:
significantly improved » significantly increased (Expand Search)
significant decrease » significant increase (Expand Search), significantly increased (Expand Search)
improved decrease » improved urease (Expand Search), marked decrease (Expand Search)
significantly improved » significantly increased (Expand Search)
significant decrease » significant increase (Expand Search), significantly increased (Expand Search)
improved decrease » improved urease (Expand Search), marked decrease (Expand Search)
-
1841
Variables used for the analysis.
Published 2024“…</p><p>Results</p><p>The results indicate that Covid-19 had a significant impact on healthcare utilization in Ghana. …”
-
1842
Trend of PNC attendance over the period.
Published 2024“…</p><p>Results</p><p>The results indicate that Covid-19 had a significant impact on healthcare utilization in Ghana. …”
-
1843
Trend of ANC attendance over the period.
Published 2024“…</p><p>Results</p><p>The results indicate that Covid-19 had a significant impact on healthcare utilization in Ghana. …”
-
1844
Total hospital attendances by specialty.
Published 2024“…</p><p>Results</p><p>The results indicate that Covid-19 had a significant impact on healthcare utilization in Ghana. …”
-
1845
Pre- & post awareness session scores.
Published 2025“…</p><p>Results</p><p>There was a significant improvement (<i>p</i><0.01) in knowledge and awareness levels of community members post the AGB exercises which included creating awareness using digital storytelling, house visits and more. …”
-
1846
VOT vs DOTS TB treatment adherence rates.
Published 2025“…</p><p>Results</p><p>There was a significant improvement (<i>p</i><0.01) in knowledge and awareness levels of community members post the AGB exercises which included creating awareness using digital storytelling, house visits and more. …”
-
1847
Sample size and duration of the pilot study.
Published 2025“…</p><p>Results</p><p>There was a significant improvement (<i>p</i><0.01) in knowledge and awareness levels of community members post the AGB exercises which included creating awareness using digital storytelling, house visits and more. …”
-
1848
Kinetic characteristics.
Published 2025“…</p><p>Results</p><p>KT significantly improved the Y-balance anterior reach distance (<i>P = 0</i>.…”
-
1849
Raw data.
Published 2025“…</p><p>Results</p><p>KT significantly improved the Y-balance anterior reach distance (<i>P = 0</i>.…”
-
1850
Schematic of the Y-balance anterior task.
Published 2025“…</p><p>Results</p><p>KT significantly improved the Y-balance anterior reach distance (<i>P = 0</i>.…”
-
1851
Demographic characteristics of the two groups.
Published 2025“…</p><p>Results</p><p>KT significantly improved the Y-balance anterior reach distance (<i>P = 0</i>.…”
-
1852
GRADE judgements.
Published 2025“…The study results demonstrated that physical exercise combined with conventional rehabilitation significantly improved VO<sub>2Peak</sub> (MD = 4.91, 95% CI: 3.52–6.29, P < 0.001), 6MWT (MD = 37.11, 95% CI: 11.72–62.51, P = 0.004), FVC% (MD = 6.54, 95% CI: 4.9–8.17, P < 0.001), and FEV<sub>1</sub>% (MD = 8.27, 95% CI: 7.39–9.14, P < 0.001) in burn patients compared to conventional rehabilitation. …”
-
1853
Basic characteristics of the included studies.
Published 2025“…The study results demonstrated that physical exercise combined with conventional rehabilitation significantly improved VO<sub>2Peak</sub> (MD = 4.91, 95% CI: 3.52–6.29, P < 0.001), 6MWT (MD = 37.11, 95% CI: 11.72–62.51, P = 0.004), FVC% (MD = 6.54, 95% CI: 4.9–8.17, P < 0.001), and FEV<sub>1</sub>% (MD = 8.27, 95% CI: 7.39–9.14, P < 0.001) in burn patients compared to conventional rehabilitation. …”
-
1854
The data of meta-analysis.
Published 2025“…The study results demonstrated that physical exercise combined with conventional rehabilitation significantly improved VO<sub>2Peak</sub> (MD = 4.91, 95% CI: 3.52–6.29, P < 0.001), 6MWT (MD = 37.11, 95% CI: 11.72–62.51, P = 0.004), FVC% (MD = 6.54, 95% CI: 4.9–8.17, P < 0.001), and FEV<sub>1</sub>% (MD = 8.27, 95% CI: 7.39–9.14, P < 0.001) in burn patients compared to conventional rehabilitation. …”
-
1855
Risk of bias.
Published 2025“…The study results demonstrated that physical exercise combined with conventional rehabilitation significantly improved VO<sub>2Peak</sub> (MD = 4.91, 95% CI: 3.52–6.29, P < 0.001), 6MWT (MD = 37.11, 95% CI: 11.72–62.51, P = 0.004), FVC% (MD = 6.54, 95% CI: 4.9–8.17, P < 0.001), and FEV<sub>1</sub>% (MD = 8.27, 95% CI: 7.39–9.14, P < 0.001) in burn patients compared to conventional rehabilitation. …”
-
1856
Overall risk of bias assessment.
Published 2025“…The study results demonstrated that physical exercise combined with conventional rehabilitation significantly improved VO<sub>2Peak</sub> (MD = 4.91, 95% CI: 3.52–6.29, P < 0.001), 6MWT (MD = 37.11, 95% CI: 11.72–62.51, P = 0.004), FVC% (MD = 6.54, 95% CI: 4.9–8.17, P < 0.001), and FEV<sub>1</sub>% (MD = 8.27, 95% CI: 7.39–9.14, P < 0.001) in burn patients compared to conventional rehabilitation. …”
-
1857
Funnel plot of VO<sub>2Peak</sub> inclusion studies.
Published 2025“…The study results demonstrated that physical exercise combined with conventional rehabilitation significantly improved VO<sub>2Peak</sub> (MD = 4.91, 95% CI: 3.52–6.29, P < 0.001), 6MWT (MD = 37.11, 95% CI: 11.72–62.51, P = 0.004), FVC% (MD = 6.54, 95% CI: 4.9–8.17, P < 0.001), and FEV<sub>1</sub>% (MD = 8.27, 95% CI: 7.39–9.14, P < 0.001) in burn patients compared to conventional rehabilitation. …”
-
1858
Analysis of subgroups.
Published 2025“…The study results demonstrated that physical exercise combined with conventional rehabilitation significantly improved VO<sub>2Peak</sub> (MD = 4.91, 95% CI: 3.52–6.29, P < 0.001), 6MWT (MD = 37.11, 95% CI: 11.72–62.51, P = 0.004), FVC% (MD = 6.54, 95% CI: 4.9–8.17, P < 0.001), and FEV<sub>1</sub>% (MD = 8.27, 95% CI: 7.39–9.14, P < 0.001) in burn patients compared to conventional rehabilitation. …”
-
1859
Overall model framework.
Published 2024“…The results show that: (1) From the experimental data of word sense disambiguation, the accuracy of the SMOSS-LSTM model proposed in this paper is the lowest when the context range is "3+3", then it rises in turn at "5+5" and "7+7", reaches the highest at "7+7", and then begins to decrease at "10+10"; (2) Compared with the control group, the accuracy of syntactic analysis in the experimental group reached 89.5%, while that in the control group was only 73.2%. (3) In the aspect of English text error detection, the detection accuracy of the proposed model in the experimental group is as high as 94.8%, which is significantly better than the traditional SMOSS-based text error detection method, and its accuracy is only 68.3%. (4) Compared with other existing researches, although it is slightly inferior to Bidirectional Encoder Representations from Transformers (BERT) in word sense disambiguation, this proposed model performs well in syntactic analysis and English text error detection, and its comprehensive performance is excellent. …”
-
1860
Key parameters of LSTM training model.
Published 2024“…The results show that: (1) From the experimental data of word sense disambiguation, the accuracy of the SMOSS-LSTM model proposed in this paper is the lowest when the context range is "3+3", then it rises in turn at "5+5" and "7+7", reaches the highest at "7+7", and then begins to decrease at "10+10"; (2) Compared with the control group, the accuracy of syntactic analysis in the experimental group reached 89.5%, while that in the control group was only 73.2%. (3) In the aspect of English text error detection, the detection accuracy of the proposed model in the experimental group is as high as 94.8%, which is significantly better than the traditional SMOSS-based text error detection method, and its accuracy is only 68.3%. (4) Compared with other existing researches, although it is slightly inferior to Bidirectional Encoder Representations from Transformers (BERT) in word sense disambiguation, this proposed model performs well in syntactic analysis and English text error detection, and its comprehensive performance is excellent. …”