Search alternatives:
significantly improving » significantly improved (Expand Search), significantly improve (Expand Search)
significant decrease » significant increase (Expand Search), significantly increased (Expand Search)
significantly improving » significantly improved (Expand Search), significantly improve (Expand Search)
significant decrease » significant increase (Expand Search), significantly increased (Expand Search)
-
1721
Pile-soil interaction.
Published 2025“…The outer ring of inclined piles in the VIPF significantly enhances structural stiffness through spatial synergy, achieving uniform load distribution and effective redistribution of pile-body internal forces. …”
-
1722
Bending moment in the tension zone.
Published 2025“…The outer ring of inclined piles in the VIPF significantly enhances structural stiffness through spatial synergy, achieving uniform load distribution and effective redistribution of pile-body internal forces. …”
-
1723
Proteome and Metabolome Profiling of Anticoagulant Disorders Induced by Familial Protein S Deficiency
Published 2024“…Furthermore, 9 differential proteins correlated significantly with protein S, comprising A2M, AGT, APOE, FGG, GPLD1, IGHV1–69, CFHR5, CPN2, and CA1. …”
-
1724
Sketch of forces on vertical and inclined piles.
Published 2025“…The outer ring of inclined piles in the VIPF significantly enhances structural stiffness through spatial synergy, achieving uniform load distribution and effective redistribution of pile-body internal forces. …”
-
1725
Proteome and Metabolome Profiling of Anticoagulant Disorders Induced by Familial Protein S Deficiency
Published 2024“…Furthermore, 9 differential proteins correlated significantly with protein S, comprising A2M, AGT, APOE, FGG, GPLD1, IGHV1–69, CFHR5, CPN2, and CA1. …”
-
1726
Displacement cloud maps.
Published 2025“…The outer ring of inclined piles in the VIPF significantly enhances structural stiffness through spatial synergy, achieving uniform load distribution and effective redistribution of pile-body internal forces. …”
-
1727
Proteome and Metabolome Profiling of Anticoagulant Disorders Induced by Familial Protein S Deficiency
Published 2024“…Furthermore, 9 differential proteins correlated significantly with protein S, comprising A2M, AGT, APOE, FGG, GPLD1, IGHV1–69, CFHR5, CPN2, and CA1. …”
-
1728
Morphing mesh.
Published 2025“…The outer ring of inclined piles in the VIPF significantly enhances structural stiffness through spatial synergy, achieving uniform load distribution and effective redistribution of pile-body internal forces. …”
-
1729
Proteome and Metabolome Profiling of Anticoagulant Disorders Induced by Familial Protein S Deficiency
Published 2024“…Furthermore, 9 differential proteins correlated significantly with protein S, comprising A2M, AGT, APOE, FGG, GPLD1, IGHV1–69, CFHR5, CPN2, and CA1. …”
-
1730
Proteome and Metabolome Profiling of Anticoagulant Disorders Induced by Familial Protein S Deficiency
Published 2024“…Furthermore, 9 differential proteins correlated significantly with protein S, comprising A2M, AGT, APOE, FGG, GPLD1, IGHV1–69, CFHR5, CPN2, and CA1. …”
-
1731
Proteome and Metabolome Profiling of Anticoagulant Disorders Induced by Familial Protein S Deficiency
Published 2024“…Furthermore, 9 differential proteins correlated significantly with protein S, comprising A2M, AGT, APOE, FGG, GPLD1, IGHV1–69, CFHR5, CPN2, and CA1. …”
-
1732
Bending moment in the pressure zone.
Published 2025“…The outer ring of inclined piles in the VIPF significantly enhances structural stiffness through spatial synergy, achieving uniform load distribution and effective redistribution of pile-body internal forces. …”
-
1733
Axial forces in the tension zone.
Published 2025“…The outer ring of inclined piles in the VIPF significantly enhances structural stiffness through spatial synergy, achieving uniform load distribution and effective redistribution of pile-body internal forces. …”
-
1734
VPF and VIPF.
Published 2025“…The outer ring of inclined piles in the VIPF significantly enhances structural stiffness through spatial synergy, achieving uniform load distribution and effective redistribution of pile-body internal forces. …”
-
1735
Flow of operation of improved KMA.
Published 2025“…The computational complexity of the improved model decreased dramatically, but the average classification accuracy was only 1.6% lower than that before the improvement. …”
-
1736
Improved DAE based on LSTM.
Published 2025“…The computational complexity of the improved model decreased dramatically, but the average classification accuracy was only 1.6% lower than that before the improvement. …”
-
1737
GRADE judgements.
Published 2025“…The study results demonstrated that physical exercise combined with conventional rehabilitation significantly improved VO<sub>2Peak</sub> (MD = 4.91, 95% CI: 3.52–6.29, P < 0.001), 6MWT (MD = 37.11, 95% CI: 11.72–62.51, P = 0.004), FVC% (MD = 6.54, 95% CI: 4.9–8.17, P < 0.001), and FEV<sub>1</sub>% (MD = 8.27, 95% CI: 7.39–9.14, P < 0.001) in burn patients compared to conventional rehabilitation. …”
-
1738
Basic characteristics of the included studies.
Published 2025“…The study results demonstrated that physical exercise combined with conventional rehabilitation significantly improved VO<sub>2Peak</sub> (MD = 4.91, 95% CI: 3.52–6.29, P < 0.001), 6MWT (MD = 37.11, 95% CI: 11.72–62.51, P = 0.004), FVC% (MD = 6.54, 95% CI: 4.9–8.17, P < 0.001), and FEV<sub>1</sub>% (MD = 8.27, 95% CI: 7.39–9.14, P < 0.001) in burn patients compared to conventional rehabilitation. …”
-
1739
The data of meta-analysis.
Published 2025“…The study results demonstrated that physical exercise combined with conventional rehabilitation significantly improved VO<sub>2Peak</sub> (MD = 4.91, 95% CI: 3.52–6.29, P < 0.001), 6MWT (MD = 37.11, 95% CI: 11.72–62.51, P = 0.004), FVC% (MD = 6.54, 95% CI: 4.9–8.17, P < 0.001), and FEV<sub>1</sub>% (MD = 8.27, 95% CI: 7.39–9.14, P < 0.001) in burn patients compared to conventional rehabilitation. …”
-
1740
Risk of bias.
Published 2025“…The study results demonstrated that physical exercise combined with conventional rehabilitation significantly improved VO<sub>2Peak</sub> (MD = 4.91, 95% CI: 3.52–6.29, P < 0.001), 6MWT (MD = 37.11, 95% CI: 11.72–62.51, P = 0.004), FVC% (MD = 6.54, 95% CI: 4.9–8.17, P < 0.001), and FEV<sub>1</sub>% (MD = 8.27, 95% CI: 7.39–9.14, P < 0.001) in burn patients compared to conventional rehabilitation. …”