Interaction panel of Treat × Period effect (T × P) for ether extract intake (g/d) as influenced by feeding pasteurized waste milk (WM) or milk replacer (MR) to newborn Holstein cal... by Shahryar Kargar (18880600)

Interaction panel of Treat × Period effect (T × P) for body measurements as influenced by feeding pasteurized waste milk (WM) or milk replacer (MR) to newborn Holstein calves (n =... by Shahryar Kargar (18880600)

Interaction panel of Treat × Period effect (T × P) for eating time (min/8-h) and sorting index (%) on sieve 2.36 mm and bottom pan as influenced by feeding pasteurized waste milk (... by Shahryar Kargar (18880600)

Interaction panel of Treat × Period effect (T × P) for starter intake (g/d), body weight (kg), average daily gain (g/d), and feed efficiency (g/g) as influenced by feeding pasteuri... by Shahryar Kargar (18880600)

Example of sample data. by Xiying Wang (4859998)

“…The results reveal that as the number of nodes in the hidden layer increases, the model’s Mean Squared Error (MSE) and Relative Error (RE) show a decreasing trend, indicating an improvement in model prediction accuracy. …”

Structure of BPNN. by Xiying Wang (4859998)

“…The results reveal that as the number of nodes in the hidden layer increases, the model’s Mean Squared Error (MSE) and Relative Error (RE) show a decreasing trend, indicating an improvement in model prediction accuracy. …”

The workflow of EGA-BPNN. by Xiying Wang (4859998)

“…The results reveal that as the number of nodes in the hidden layer increases, the model’s Mean Squared Error (MSE) and Relative Error (RE) show a decreasing trend, indicating an improvement in model prediction accuracy. …”

S1 Data - by Xiying Wang (4859998)

“…The results reveal that as the number of nodes in the hidden layer increases, the model’s Mean Squared Error (MSE) and Relative Error (RE) show a decreasing trend, indicating an improvement in model prediction accuracy. …”

Algorithm flow of the GA-BPNN model. by Xiying Wang (4859998)

“…The results reveal that as the number of nodes in the hidden layer increases, the model’s Mean Squared Error (MSE) and Relative Error (RE) show a decreasing trend, indicating an improvement in model prediction accuracy. …”

Modeling method used. by Claire Teillet (18986264)

“…The most influential variables for predicting larval presence were the mean of Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI), texture indices from both NDVI, brightness index (BI), and the panchromatic image. Urban vegetation significantly influences larval presence, although higher vegetation index values correlate with a decreased probability of larval occurrence. …”

Loading Thiacorrole with Various Aromatic Rings: Enhanced NIR Absorption and Improved OER Activity by Jiayang Liu (10650926)

Table 1_Intravitreal aflibercept for diabetic macular edema: structural and functional improvements.docx by Chuanhe Zhang (17601519)

“…After treatment, CRT decreased, BVCA, MLS, and fixation stability improved (all p < 0.001). …”

Table_2_Taxifolin increased semen quality of Duroc boars by improving gut microbes and blood metabolites.XLSX by Yexun Zhou (11711813)

Table_3_Taxifolin increased semen quality of Duroc boars by improving gut microbes and blood metabolites.DOCX by Yexun Zhou (11711813)

Table_4_Taxifolin increased semen quality of Duroc boars by improving gut microbes and blood metabolites.DOCX by Yexun Zhou (11711813)

Overall model framework. by Ke Yan (331581)

“…The results show that: (1) From the experimental data of word sense disambiguation, the accuracy of the SMOSS-LSTM model proposed in this paper is the lowest when the context range is "3+3", then it rises in turn at "5+5" and "7+7", reaches the highest at "7+7", and then begins to decrease at "10+10"; (2) Compared with the control group, the accuracy of syntactic analysis in the experimental group reached 89.5%, while that in the control group was only 73.2%. (3) In the aspect of English text error detection, the detection accuracy of the proposed model in the experimental group is as high as 94.8%, which is significantly better than the traditional SMOSS-based text error detection method, and its accuracy is only 68.3%. (4) Compared with other existing researches, although it is slightly inferior to Bidirectional Encoder Representations from Transformers (BERT) in word sense disambiguation, this proposed model performs well in syntactic analysis and English text error detection, and its comprehensive performance is excellent. …”

Key parameters of LSTM training model. by Ke Yan (331581)

“…The results show that: (1) From the experimental data of word sense disambiguation, the accuracy of the SMOSS-LSTM model proposed in this paper is the lowest when the context range is "3+3", then it rises in turn at "5+5" and "7+7", reaches the highest at "7+7", and then begins to decrease at "10+10"; (2) Compared with the control group, the accuracy of syntactic analysis in the experimental group reached 89.5%, while that in the control group was only 73.2%. (3) In the aspect of English text error detection, the detection accuracy of the proposed model in the experimental group is as high as 94.8%, which is significantly better than the traditional SMOSS-based text error detection method, and its accuracy is only 68.3%. (4) Compared with other existing researches, although it is slightly inferior to Bidirectional Encoder Representations from Transformers (BERT) in word sense disambiguation, this proposed model performs well in syntactic analysis and English text error detection, and its comprehensive performance is excellent. …”

Comparison chart of model evaluation results. by Ke Yan (331581)

“…The results show that: (1) From the experimental data of word sense disambiguation, the accuracy of the SMOSS-LSTM model proposed in this paper is the lowest when the context range is "3+3", then it rises in turn at "5+5" and "7+7", reaches the highest at "7+7", and then begins to decrease at "10+10"; (2) Compared with the control group, the accuracy of syntactic analysis in the experimental group reached 89.5%, while that in the control group was only 73.2%. (3) In the aspect of English text error detection, the detection accuracy of the proposed model in the experimental group is as high as 94.8%, which is significantly better than the traditional SMOSS-based text error detection method, and its accuracy is only 68.3%. (4) Compared with other existing researches, although it is slightly inferior to Bidirectional Encoder Representations from Transformers (BERT) in word sense disambiguation, this proposed model performs well in syntactic analysis and English text error detection, and its comprehensive performance is excellent. …”

Model performance evaluation results. by Ke Yan (331581)

“…The results show that: (1) From the experimental data of word sense disambiguation, the accuracy of the SMOSS-LSTM model proposed in this paper is the lowest when the context range is "3+3", then it rises in turn at "5+5" and "7+7", reaches the highest at "7+7", and then begins to decrease at "10+10"; (2) Compared with the control group, the accuracy of syntactic analysis in the experimental group reached 89.5%, while that in the control group was only 73.2%. (3) In the aspect of English text error detection, the detection accuracy of the proposed model in the experimental group is as high as 94.8%, which is significantly better than the traditional SMOSS-based text error detection method, and its accuracy is only 68.3%. (4) Compared with other existing researches, although it is slightly inferior to Bidirectional Encoder Representations from Transformers (BERT) in word sense disambiguation, this proposed model performs well in syntactic analysis and English text error detection, and its comprehensive performance is excellent. …”

The result compared with other existing methods. by Ke Yan (331581)

“…The results show that: (1) From the experimental data of word sense disambiguation, the accuracy of the SMOSS-LSTM model proposed in this paper is the lowest when the context range is "3+3", then it rises in turn at "5+5" and "7+7", reaches the highest at "7+7", and then begins to decrease at "10+10"; (2) Compared with the control group, the accuracy of syntactic analysis in the experimental group reached 89.5%, while that in the control group was only 73.2%. (3) In the aspect of English text error detection, the detection accuracy of the proposed model in the experimental group is as high as 94.8%, which is significantly better than the traditional SMOSS-based text error detection method, and its accuracy is only 68.3%. (4) Compared with other existing researches, although it is slightly inferior to Bidirectional Encoder Representations from Transformers (BERT) in word sense disambiguation, this proposed model performs well in syntactic analysis and English text error detection, and its comprehensive performance is excellent. …”