Search alternatives:
significant decrease » significant increase (Expand Search), significantly increased (Expand Search)
significantly lower » significantly higher (Expand Search)
lower decrease » larger decrease (Expand Search), linear decrease (Expand Search), teer decrease (Expand Search)
significant decrease » significant increase (Expand Search), significantly increased (Expand Search)
significantly lower » significantly higher (Expand Search)
lower decrease » larger decrease (Expand Search), linear decrease (Expand Search), teer decrease (Expand Search)
-
281
-
282
-
283
-
284
-
285
-
286
-
287
-
288
-
289
-
290
-
291
-
292
-
293
Comparison of renal tissue pathological damage grades across different groups at all time points.
Published 2024Subjects: -
294
Comparison of PCNA expression grades across different groups at various time points.
Published 2024Subjects: -
295
PAS staining images of pathological changes in renal tissues among 4 groups (×400).
Published 2024Subjects: -
296
-
297
-
298
Comparison of mTOR expression grading among different groups at different time points.
Published 2024Subjects: -
299
-
300
Summary of miRNAs sequencing data quality.
Published 2025“…</p><p>Results</p><p>1) Hemodynamic tests revealed that the blood pressure of SHRs in the BFRT decreased significantly and that the blood pressure level of SHRs in the BFRT decreased more significantly than that of the simple resistance training groups did (P < 0.05). 2) Cardiac function tests revealed that the EF, FS, and MV E/A of SHRs in the BFRT significantly increased, whereas the HR, IVSd, IVSs, LVIDd, LIVDs, LVPWd, LVPWs and LV mass significantly decreased (P < 0.05). 3) Transcriptome sequencing revealed 9 differentially expressed miRNAs in the BFRT group compared with the SHR-SED group (2 miRNAs were significantly upregulated, and 7 miRNAs were significantly downregulated), with P < 0.05 and |log2FoldChange| ≥ 1 used as the criteria for differential significance. …”