Showing 1,921 - 1,940 results of 3,184 for search '(( significant decrease decrease ) OR ( significantly mean decrease ))~', query time: 0.37s Refine Results
  1. 1921

    Complexity comparison results. by Gang Xu (219455)

    Published 2025
    “…Evaluation on the ScanNetV2 multi-view 3D object detection dataset demonstrates that ImVoxelGNet achieves a performance improvement of up to 2.2% in mean average precision (mAP). This improvement effectively demonstrates the efficacy of our method in significantly enhancing 3D object detection performance through improved geometric perception and comprehensive scene understanding. …”
  2. 1922

    Ablation results on Nerf-Det [28]. by Gang Xu (219455)

    Published 2025
    “…Evaluation on the ScanNetV2 multi-view 3D object detection dataset demonstrates that ImVoxelGNet achieves a performance improvement of up to 2.2% in mean average precision (mAP). This improvement effectively demonstrates the efficacy of our method in significantly enhancing 3D object detection performance through improved geometric perception and comprehensive scene understanding. …”
  3. 1923

    Ablation results on noise. by Gang Xu (219455)

    Published 2025
    “…Evaluation on the ScanNetV2 multi-view 3D object detection dataset demonstrates that ImVoxelGNet achieves a performance improvement of up to 2.2% in mean average precision (mAP). This improvement effectively demonstrates the efficacy of our method in significantly enhancing 3D object detection performance through improved geometric perception and comprehensive scene understanding. …”
  4. 1924
  5. 1925
  6. 1926
  7. 1927
  8. 1928
  9. 1929
  10. 1930
  11. 1931
  12. 1932

    Search strategy. by Alvine M. Akumbom (20460907)

    Published 2024
    “…GMT results of HPV16 and HPV18 genotypes were significantly lower in PWH; Hedges’s g -0.434 (95% CI: -0.823, -0.046) and Hedges’s g -0.57 (95% CI: -0.72, -0.43), respectively. …”
  13. 1933

    Fig 1 - by Alvine M. Akumbom (20460907)

    Published 2024
    “…GMT results of HPV16 and HPV18 genotypes were significantly lower in PWH; Hedges’s g -0.434 (95% CI: -0.823, -0.046) and Hedges’s g -0.57 (95% CI: -0.72, -0.43), respectively. …”
  14. 1934

    GMT by age cohort for PWH and PWoH. by Alvine M. Akumbom (20460907)

    Published 2024
    “…GMT results of HPV16 and HPV18 genotypes were significantly lower in PWH; Hedges’s g -0.434 (95% CI: -0.823, -0.046) and Hedges’s g -0.57 (95% CI: -0.72, -0.43), respectively. …”
  15. 1935

    Fig 4 - by Alvine M. Akumbom (20460907)

    Published 2024
    “…GMT results of HPV16 and HPV18 genotypes were significantly lower in PWH; Hedges’s g -0.434 (95% CI: -0.823, -0.046) and Hedges’s g -0.57 (95% CI: -0.72, -0.43), respectively. …”
  16. 1936

    Difference in GMT for HPV16 and HPV18 in PWH. by Alvine M. Akumbom (20460907)

    Published 2024
    “…GMT results of HPV16 and HPV18 genotypes were significantly lower in PWH; Hedges’s g -0.434 (95% CI: -0.823, -0.046) and Hedges’s g -0.57 (95% CI: -0.72, -0.43), respectively. …”
  17. 1937

    Fig 3 - by Alvine M. Akumbom (20460907)

    Published 2024
    “…GMT results of HPV16 and HPV18 genotypes were significantly lower in PWH; Hedges’s g -0.434 (95% CI: -0.823, -0.046) and Hedges’s g -0.57 (95% CI: -0.72, -0.43), respectively. …”
  18. 1938

    Summary of characteristics of studies reviewed. by Alvine M. Akumbom (20460907)

    Published 2024
    “…GMT results of HPV16 and HPV18 genotypes were significantly lower in PWH; Hedges’s g -0.434 (95% CI: -0.823, -0.046) and Hedges’s g -0.57 (95% CI: -0.72, -0.43), respectively. …”
  19. 1939

    Cumulative meta-analysis. by Alvine M. Akumbom (20460907)

    Published 2024
    “…GMT results of HPV16 and HPV18 genotypes were significantly lower in PWH; Hedges’s g -0.434 (95% CI: -0.823, -0.046) and Hedges’s g -0.57 (95% CI: -0.72, -0.43), respectively. …”
  20. 1940

    Summary of immunogenicity information. by Alvine M. Akumbom (20460907)

    Published 2024
    “…GMT results of HPV16 and HPV18 genotypes were significantly lower in PWH; Hedges’s g -0.434 (95% CI: -0.823, -0.046) and Hedges’s g -0.57 (95% CI: -0.72, -0.43), respectively. …”