Search alternatives:
significantly observed » significantly bolstered (Expand Search), significantly altered (Expand Search), significantly clustered (Expand Search)
significant decrease » significant increase (Expand Search), significantly increased (Expand Search)
significantly observed » significantly bolstered (Expand Search), significantly altered (Expand Search), significantly clustered (Expand Search)
significant decrease » significant increase (Expand Search), significantly increased (Expand Search)
-
2961
Table 1_Unexpected estradiol decline during ovarian stimulation monitoring affects cumulative live birth.docx
Published 2025“…In both unmatched and matched cohorts, the CLBRs were significantly decreased (unmatched cohort: 66.3% versus 55%, P<0.001, adjusted OR 0.83, 95% CI: 0.76,0.91; matched cohort: 59% versus 55%, P = 0.003, adjusted OR 0.84, 95%CI: 0.75,0.94). …”
-
2962
Mini EDHS 2019 data set in excel Stata form.
Published 2024“…These results showed a statistically significant full antenatal care utilization gap in rural urban resident women (-0.21807, 95% CI:(-0.27397, -0.16217)). …”
-
2963
S1 Data -
Published 2024“…These results showed a statistically significant full antenatal care utilization gap in rural urban resident women (-0.21807, 95% CI:(-0.27397, -0.16217)). …”
-
2964
Related to Fig 4. <i>NDUFS7</i> depletion in neurons lowers the failure rate of neurotransmission at very low calcium concentrations.
Published 2025“…(<b>P</b>) Quantification of the EPSP amplitudes in the indicated stimulus number in the genotypes mentioned above. No significant depletion in vesicle pools was observed when <i>UAS-NDUFS7[RNAi]</i>-depleted animals were subjected to high-frequency nerve stimulation for 10 min. …”
-
2965
Table 1_SARS-CoV-2 testing strategies for a safe (post-)pandemic implementation of school music trips and their impact on participants’ health.docx
Published 2025“…</sub> There was a significant decrease in cold symptoms among students (p = 0.002). …”
-
2966
Assessment of calcium events, pERK levels, NMDA receptor expression and extracellular zinc levels in <i>slc13a5</i> mutants.
Published 2025“…Data are Mean ± S.E.M., ns: no significant changes observed, * P ≤ 0.05, **P ≤ 0.01, ***P ≤ 0.001- Unpaired <i>t</i> test. …”
-
2967
Supplementary Material for: Conversion Ability of Immunotherapy in Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Insights from the International Converse Study
Published 2025“…Results: Forty-eight international centres treating 2,379 patients with HCC with a noncurative intent (1,401 with AB and 978 with LENV) were included. A significant discrepancy was observed between PC (16% and 13% for AB and LENV, p=0.03) and AC rates (3% for both AB and LENV, p=0.14). …”
-
2968
Table 2_A comprehensive and systematic review on resveratrol supplementation as a promising candidate for the retinal disease: a focus on mechanisms of action from preclinical stud...
Published 2025“…Moreover, a decrease in malondialdehyde (SMD = −9.29,95% Cl = [−12.84, −5.74], p < 0.00001), reactive oxygen species level (SMD = −4.29,95% Cl = [-6.25, −2.32], p < 0.0001), cyclooxygenase-2 (SMD = −2.66, 95% Cl = [−4.01, −1.30], p =0.0001), tumour necrosis factor-α(SMD = −3.96,95% Cl = [−6.27, −1.65], p = 0.0008) and interleukin-6 (SMD = −3.32,95% Cl = [−4.20, −2.44], p < 0.00001) was observed. …”
-
2969
Table 1_A comprehensive and systematic review on resveratrol supplementation as a promising candidate for the retinal disease: a focus on mechanisms of action from preclinical stud...
Published 2025“…Moreover, a decrease in malondialdehyde (SMD = −9.29,95% Cl = [−12.84, −5.74], p < 0.00001), reactive oxygen species level (SMD = −4.29,95% Cl = [-6.25, −2.32], p < 0.0001), cyclooxygenase-2 (SMD = −2.66, 95% Cl = [−4.01, −1.30], p =0.0001), tumour necrosis factor-α(SMD = −3.96,95% Cl = [−6.27, −1.65], p = 0.0008) and interleukin-6 (SMD = −3.32,95% Cl = [−4.20, −2.44], p < 0.00001) was observed. …”
-
2970
Table 1_Diverging trends in the global burden of ischemic heart disease attributable to non-optimal temperatures: a historical analysis (1990–2021) and 2050 projections.docx
Published 2025“…Significant socioeconomic disparities were observed, with low-to-middle SDI regions bearing a disproportionate share (75.0%) of the global high non-optimal temperature-related mortality burden. …”
-
2971
Data Sheet 1_Diverging trends in the global burden of ischemic heart disease attributable to non-optimal temperatures: a historical analysis (1990–2021) and 2050 projections.csv
Published 2025“…Significant socioeconomic disparities were observed, with low-to-middle SDI regions bearing a disproportionate share (75.0%) of the global high non-optimal temperature-related mortality burden. …”
-
2972
Table1_Safety evaluation of medroxyprogesterone acetate: a pharmacovigilance analysis using FDA adverse event reporting system data.DOCX
Published 2025“…Unforeseen significant AEs such as unintended pregnancy (n = 623; ROR, 6.65; ROR025, 6.1; χ<sup>2</sup>, 2,482.38; PRR, 6.41; EBGM, 5.69; EBGM05, 5.29), bone pain (n = 35; ROR, 13.78; ROR025, 9.4; χ<sup>2</sup>, 311.2; PRR, 13.75; EBGM, 10.59; EBGM05, 7.69), gait disturbance (n = 34; ROR, 2.82; ROR025, 1.99; χ<sup>2</sup>, 37.31; PRR, 2.88; EBGM, 2.7; EBGM05, 2.02), dental caries (n = 15; ROR, 23.16; ROR025, 12.32; χ<sup>2</sup>, 204.26; PRR, 23.14; EBGM, 15.23; EBGM05, 8.98), decrease in blood pressure (n = 15; ROR, 3.88; ROR025, 2.29; χ<sup>2</sup>, 29.35; PRR, 3.88; EBGM, 3.63; EBGM05, 2.33), and osteonecrosis (n = 9; ROR, 23.44; ROR025, 10.36; χ<sup>2</sup>, 123.67; PRR, 23.43; EBGM, 15.35; EBGM05, 7.75) were identified as AEs that were not previously outlined in the prescribing information of the medication.…”
-
2973
Table1_Safety evaluation of medroxyprogesterone acetate: a pharmacovigilance analysis using FDA adverse event reporting system data.DOCX
Published 2024“…Unforeseen significant AEs such as unintended pregnancy (n = 623; ROR, 6.65; ROR025, 6.1; χ<sup>2</sup>, 2,482.38; PRR, 6.41; EBGM, 5.69; EBGM05, 5.29), bone pain (n = 35; ROR, 13.78; ROR025, 9.4; χ<sup>2</sup>, 311.2; PRR, 13.75; EBGM, 10.59; EBGM05, 7.69), gait disturbance (n = 34; ROR, 2.82; ROR025, 1.99; χ<sup>2</sup>, 37.31; PRR, 2.88; EBGM, 2.7; EBGM05, 2.02), dental caries (n = 15; ROR, 23.16; ROR025, 12.32; χ<sup>2</sup>, 204.26; PRR, 23.14; EBGM, 15.23; EBGM05, 8.98), decrease in blood pressure (n = 15; ROR, 3.88; ROR025, 2.29; χ<sup>2</sup>, 29.35; PRR, 3.88; EBGM, 3.63; EBGM05, 2.33), and osteonecrosis (n = 9; ROR, 23.44; ROR025, 10.36; χ<sup>2</sup>, 123.67; PRR, 23.43; EBGM, 15.35; EBGM05, 7.75) were identified as AEs that were not previously outlined in the prescribing information of the medication.…”
-
2974
Image 5_Unexpected estradiol decline during ovarian stimulation monitoring affects cumulative live birth.png
Published 2025“…In both unmatched and matched cohorts, the CLBRs were significantly decreased (unmatched cohort: 66.3% versus 55%, P<0.001, adjusted OR 0.83, 95% CI: 0.76,0.91; matched cohort: 59% versus 55%, P = 0.003, adjusted OR 0.84, 95%CI: 0.75,0.94). …”
-
2975
Image 9_Unexpected estradiol decline during ovarian stimulation monitoring affects cumulative live birth.tiff
Published 2025“…In both unmatched and matched cohorts, the CLBRs were significantly decreased (unmatched cohort: 66.3% versus 55%, P<0.001, adjusted OR 0.83, 95% CI: 0.76,0.91; matched cohort: 59% versus 55%, P = 0.003, adjusted OR 0.84, 95%CI: 0.75,0.94). …”
-
2976
Image 1_Unexpected estradiol decline during ovarian stimulation monitoring affects cumulative live birth.jpeg
Published 2025“…In both unmatched and matched cohorts, the CLBRs were significantly decreased (unmatched cohort: 66.3% versus 55%, P<0.001, adjusted OR 0.83, 95% CI: 0.76,0.91; matched cohort: 59% versus 55%, P = 0.003, adjusted OR 0.84, 95%CI: 0.75,0.94). …”
-
2977
Image 2_Unexpected estradiol decline during ovarian stimulation monitoring affects cumulative live birth.tiff
Published 2025“…In both unmatched and matched cohorts, the CLBRs were significantly decreased (unmatched cohort: 66.3% versus 55%, P<0.001, adjusted OR 0.83, 95% CI: 0.76,0.91; matched cohort: 59% versus 55%, P = 0.003, adjusted OR 0.84, 95%CI: 0.75,0.94). …”
-
2978
Image 8_Unexpected estradiol decline during ovarian stimulation monitoring affects cumulative live birth.tiff
Published 2025“…In both unmatched and matched cohorts, the CLBRs were significantly decreased (unmatched cohort: 66.3% versus 55%, P<0.001, adjusted OR 0.83, 95% CI: 0.76,0.91; matched cohort: 59% versus 55%, P = 0.003, adjusted OR 0.84, 95%CI: 0.75,0.94). …”
-
2979
Image 7_Unexpected estradiol decline during ovarian stimulation monitoring affects cumulative live birth.tiff
Published 2025“…In both unmatched and matched cohorts, the CLBRs were significantly decreased (unmatched cohort: 66.3% versus 55%, P<0.001, adjusted OR 0.83, 95% CI: 0.76,0.91; matched cohort: 59% versus 55%, P = 0.003, adjusted OR 0.84, 95%CI: 0.75,0.94). …”
-
2980
Image 10_Unexpected estradiol decline during ovarian stimulation monitoring affects cumulative live birth.tiff
Published 2025“…In both unmatched and matched cohorts, the CLBRs were significantly decreased (unmatched cohort: 66.3% versus 55%, P<0.001, adjusted OR 0.83, 95% CI: 0.76,0.91; matched cohort: 59% versus 55%, P = 0.003, adjusted OR 0.84, 95%CI: 0.75,0.94). …”