Showing 1,001 - 1,020 results of 1,716 for search '(( significant decrease decrease ) OR ( significantly point decrease ))~', query time: 0.40s Refine Results
  1. 1001

    YOLOv8n-BWG detection results diagram. by Yaojun Zhang (389482)

    Published 2025
    “…Results on a specialized dataset reveal that YOLOv8n-BWG outperforms YOLOv8n by increasing the mean Average Precision (mAP) by 4.2%, boosting recognition speed by 21.3% per second, and decreasing both the number of floating-point operations (FLOPs) by 28.9% and model size by 26.3%. …”
  2. 1002

    GSConv module structure diagram. by Yaojun Zhang (389482)

    Published 2025
    “…Results on a specialized dataset reveal that YOLOv8n-BWG outperforms YOLOv8n by increasing the mean Average Precision (mAP) by 4.2%, boosting recognition speed by 21.3% per second, and decreasing both the number of floating-point operations (FLOPs) by 28.9% and model size by 26.3%. …”
  3. 1003

    Performance comparison of three loss functions. by Yaojun Zhang (389482)

    Published 2025
    “…Results on a specialized dataset reveal that YOLOv8n-BWG outperforms YOLOv8n by increasing the mean Average Precision (mAP) by 4.2%, boosting recognition speed by 21.3% per second, and decreasing both the number of floating-point operations (FLOPs) by 28.9% and model size by 26.3%. …”
  4. 1004

    mAP0.5 Curves of various models. by Yaojun Zhang (389482)

    Published 2025
    “…Results on a specialized dataset reveal that YOLOv8n-BWG outperforms YOLOv8n by increasing the mean Average Precision (mAP) by 4.2%, boosting recognition speed by 21.3% per second, and decreasing both the number of floating-point operations (FLOPs) by 28.9% and model size by 26.3%. …”
  5. 1005

    Network loss function change diagram. by Yaojun Zhang (389482)

    Published 2025
    “…Results on a specialized dataset reveal that YOLOv8n-BWG outperforms YOLOv8n by increasing the mean Average Precision (mAP) by 4.2%, boosting recognition speed by 21.3% per second, and decreasing both the number of floating-point operations (FLOPs) by 28.9% and model size by 26.3%. …”
  6. 1006

    Comparative diagrams of different indicators. by Yaojun Zhang (389482)

    Published 2025
    “…Results on a specialized dataset reveal that YOLOv8n-BWG outperforms YOLOv8n by increasing the mean Average Precision (mAP) by 4.2%, boosting recognition speed by 21.3% per second, and decreasing both the number of floating-point operations (FLOPs) by 28.9% and model size by 26.3%. …”
  7. 1007

    YOLOv8n structure diagram. by Yaojun Zhang (389482)

    Published 2025
    “…Results on a specialized dataset reveal that YOLOv8n-BWG outperforms YOLOv8n by increasing the mean Average Precision (mAP) by 4.2%, boosting recognition speed by 21.3% per second, and decreasing both the number of floating-point operations (FLOPs) by 28.9% and model size by 26.3%. …”
  8. 1008

    Geometric model of the binocular system. by Yaojun Zhang (389482)

    Published 2025
    “…Results on a specialized dataset reveal that YOLOv8n-BWG outperforms YOLOv8n by increasing the mean Average Precision (mAP) by 4.2%, boosting recognition speed by 21.3% per second, and decreasing both the number of floating-point operations (FLOPs) by 28.9% and model size by 26.3%. …”
  9. 1009

    Enhanced dataset sample images. by Yaojun Zhang (389482)

    Published 2025
    “…Results on a specialized dataset reveal that YOLOv8n-BWG outperforms YOLOv8n by increasing the mean Average Precision (mAP) by 4.2%, boosting recognition speed by 21.3% per second, and decreasing both the number of floating-point operations (FLOPs) by 28.9% and model size by 26.3%. …”
  10. 1010

    Baseline measures of participants. by Philippa Charlotte Rose Wheble (21578605)

    Published 2025
    “…Post hoc Wilcoxon-signed rank tests with Bonferroni correction for multiple comparisons revealed significant differences between K-MPAI scores at time points Post 3 and Pre 3 (z = 3.00, adj. p = .040), Post 3 and Pre 2 (z = 3.27, adj. p = .016) and Post 3 and Pre 1 (z = 2.95, adj. p = .048). …”
  11. 1011

    Demographic characteristics of participants. by Philippa Charlotte Rose Wheble (21578605)

    Published 2025
    “…Post hoc Wilcoxon-signed rank tests with Bonferroni correction for multiple comparisons revealed significant differences between K-MPAI scores at time points Post 3 and Pre 3 (z = 3.00, adj. p = .040), Post 3 and Pre 2 (z = 3.27, adj. p = .016) and Post 3 and Pre 1 (z = 2.95, adj. p = .048). …”
  12. 1012
  13. 1013

    Fig S1. by Leonardo Santos (477304)

    Published 2025
    “…Black arrows indicate the formation of heteroduplexes, which are absent in the controls of uninduced and untransfected cells, as well as in induced but untransfected cells (Ctrl and Ctrl2, respectively). A noticeable decrease in amplicon yield suggests significant modifications following Cas9 cleavage and DNA repair processes. …”
  14. 1014
  15. 1015
  16. 1016
  17. 1017

    The head-withdrawal threshold of naïve rats receiving CGRP. by Hiroharu Maegawa (8087543)

    Published 2025
    “…In naïve rats receiving CGRP, a significant decrease was found at 1 day after the CGRP administration as compared to that before administration. * <i>p</i> < 0.05. …”
  18. 1018
  19. 1019

    Inverse Simpson index (A) and richness (B) shown for the post-operative and perioperative groups. by Allison J. Collier (13977858)

    Published 2025
    “…Significant differences were noted in richness (B) overall between time points (p < 0.05) in both the perioperative and post-operative group, and specifically between Baseline and Recheck 1 (p = 0.02 in perioperative and p = 0.01 in the post-operative group), but not between the other time points.…”
  20. 1020

    The expression of PAX7 and MYOD1 correlate with differential expression of diverse chemokines in HuMuSC. by Katharine Striedinger (15503387)

    Published 2025
    “…Using linear regression PAX7 slope varies significantly p = 0.0001 and MYOD1 slope also varies significantly p = 0.05 n = 3 <b>(b)</b> Heat map displaying the expression levels of all cytokine protein detected in HuMuSC from collection as they activate progressively at day 0, day 3 and day 6 <i>in vitro</i>, using the high throughput proteomic Multiplex assay. …”