بدائل البحث:
significant decrease » significant increase (توسيع البحث), significantly increased (توسيع البحث)
reduced decrease » reduced disease (توسيع البحث), reported decrease (توسيع البحث), induces decreased (توسيع البحث)
significant decrease » significant increase (توسيع البحث), significantly increased (توسيع البحث)
reduced decrease » reduced disease (توسيع البحث), reported decrease (توسيع البحث), induces decreased (توسيع البحث)
-
1961
-
1962
-
1963
-
1964
-
1965
-
1966
-
1967
-
1968
-
1969
-
1970
-
1971
-
1972
-
1973
-
1974
-
1975
-
1976
-
1977
Preference for the EIA – conjoint results.
منشور في 2025"…When are individuals more likely to support equal treatment algorithms (ETAs), characterized by higher predictive accuracy, and when do they prefer equal impact algorithms (EIAs) that reduce performance gaps between groups? A randomized conjoint experiment and a follow-up choice experiment revealed that support for the EIAs decreased sharply as their accuracy gap grew, although impact parity was prioritized more when ETAs produced large outcome discrepancies. …"
-
1978
Marginal means – Pooled across scenarios.
منشور في 2025"…When are individuals more likely to support equal treatment algorithms (ETAs), characterized by higher predictive accuracy, and when do they prefer equal impact algorithms (EIAs) that reduce performance gaps between groups? A randomized conjoint experiment and a follow-up choice experiment revealed that support for the EIAs decreased sharply as their accuracy gap grew, although impact parity was prioritized more when ETAs produced large outcome discrepancies. …"
-
1979
Sample attribute table.
منشور في 2025"…When are individuals more likely to support equal treatment algorithms (ETAs), characterized by higher predictive accuracy, and when do they prefer equal impact algorithms (EIAs) that reduce performance gaps between groups? A randomized conjoint experiment and a follow-up choice experiment revealed that support for the EIAs decreased sharply as their accuracy gap grew, although impact parity was prioritized more when ETAs produced large outcome discrepancies. …"
-
1980
Subgroup analysis – Political affiliation.
منشور في 2025"…When are individuals more likely to support equal treatment algorithms (ETAs), characterized by higher predictive accuracy, and when do they prefer equal impact algorithms (EIAs) that reduce performance gaps between groups? A randomized conjoint experiment and a follow-up choice experiment revealed that support for the EIAs decreased sharply as their accuracy gap grew, although impact parity was prioritized more when ETAs produced large outcome discrepancies. …"