Search alternatives:
significant decrease » significant increase (Expand Search), significantly increased (Expand Search)
reduced decrease » reduced disease (Expand Search), reported decrease (Expand Search), induces decreased (Expand Search)
significant decrease » significant increase (Expand Search), significantly increased (Expand Search)
reduced decrease » reduced disease (Expand Search), reported decrease (Expand Search), induces decreased (Expand Search)
-
2321
Heterogeneity test.
Published 2024“…The findings reveal that: (1) At this stage, digital transformation in listed companies effectively reduces their carbon intensity, but the relationship between the two is not linear; instead, it exhibits a U-shaped trajectory, initially decreasing then increasing. (2) Analysis of mechanism indicates that costs associated with environmental governance and innovations in green technology serve as critical pathways through which corporate digital transformation influences carbon intensity. (3) The analysis of driving effect suggests that the digital transformation significantly curtails the carbon emission intensity of both upstream and downstream enterprises as well as those within the same industry and geographical region, through industrial linkage and the cohort effect. (4) Heterogeneity analysis elucidates that the digital transformation of enterprises in regions with stronger government environmental regulations has a markedly more pronounced effect on reducing the carbon emission intensity. …”
-
2322
S1 File -
Published 2024“…The findings reveal that: (1) At this stage, digital transformation in listed companies effectively reduces their carbon intensity, but the relationship between the two is not linear; instead, it exhibits a U-shaped trajectory, initially decreasing then increasing. (2) Analysis of mechanism indicates that costs associated with environmental governance and innovations in green technology serve as critical pathways through which corporate digital transformation influences carbon intensity. (3) The analysis of driving effect suggests that the digital transformation significantly curtails the carbon emission intensity of both upstream and downstream enterprises as well as those within the same industry and geographical region, through industrial linkage and the cohort effect. (4) Heterogeneity analysis elucidates that the digital transformation of enterprises in regions with stronger government environmental regulations has a markedly more pronounced effect on reducing the carbon emission intensity. …”
-
2323
The robustness test.
Published 2024“…The findings reveal that: (1) At this stage, digital transformation in listed companies effectively reduces their carbon intensity, but the relationship between the two is not linear; instead, it exhibits a U-shaped trajectory, initially decreasing then increasing. (2) Analysis of mechanism indicates that costs associated with environmental governance and innovations in green technology serve as critical pathways through which corporate digital transformation influences carbon intensity. (3) The analysis of driving effect suggests that the digital transformation significantly curtails the carbon emission intensity of both upstream and downstream enterprises as well as those within the same industry and geographical region, through industrial linkage and the cohort effect. (4) Heterogeneity analysis elucidates that the digital transformation of enterprises in regions with stronger government environmental regulations has a markedly more pronounced effect on reducing the carbon emission intensity. …”
-
2324
Mechanistic testing.
Published 2024“…The findings reveal that: (1) At this stage, digital transformation in listed companies effectively reduces their carbon intensity, but the relationship between the two is not linear; instead, it exhibits a U-shaped trajectory, initially decreasing then increasing. (2) Analysis of mechanism indicates that costs associated with environmental governance and innovations in green technology serve as critical pathways through which corporate digital transformation influences carbon intensity. (3) The analysis of driving effect suggests that the digital transformation significantly curtails the carbon emission intensity of both upstream and downstream enterprises as well as those within the same industry and geographical region, through industrial linkage and the cohort effect. (4) Heterogeneity analysis elucidates that the digital transformation of enterprises in regions with stronger government environmental regulations has a markedly more pronounced effect on reducing the carbon emission intensity. …”
-
2325
Descriptive statistics of variables.
Published 2024“…The findings reveal that: (1) At this stage, digital transformation in listed companies effectively reduces their carbon intensity, but the relationship between the two is not linear; instead, it exhibits a U-shaped trajectory, initially decreasing then increasing. (2) Analysis of mechanism indicates that costs associated with environmental governance and innovations in green technology serve as critical pathways through which corporate digital transformation influences carbon intensity. (3) The analysis of driving effect suggests that the digital transformation significantly curtails the carbon emission intensity of both upstream and downstream enterprises as well as those within the same industry and geographical region, through industrial linkage and the cohort effect. (4) Heterogeneity analysis elucidates that the digital transformation of enterprises in regions with stronger government environmental regulations has a markedly more pronounced effect on reducing the carbon emission intensity. …”
-
2326
Endogenous treatment.
Published 2024“…The findings reveal that: (1) At this stage, digital transformation in listed companies effectively reduces their carbon intensity, but the relationship between the two is not linear; instead, it exhibits a U-shaped trajectory, initially decreasing then increasing. (2) Analysis of mechanism indicates that costs associated with environmental governance and innovations in green technology serve as critical pathways through which corporate digital transformation influences carbon intensity. (3) The analysis of driving effect suggests that the digital transformation significantly curtails the carbon emission intensity of both upstream and downstream enterprises as well as those within the same industry and geographical region, through industrial linkage and the cohort effect. (4) Heterogeneity analysis elucidates that the digital transformation of enterprises in regions with stronger government environmental regulations has a markedly more pronounced effect on reducing the carbon emission intensity. …”
-
2327
Analysis of industry linkage effects.
Published 2024“…The findings reveal that: (1) At this stage, digital transformation in listed companies effectively reduces their carbon intensity, but the relationship between the two is not linear; instead, it exhibits a U-shaped trajectory, initially decreasing then increasing. (2) Analysis of mechanism indicates that costs associated with environmental governance and innovations in green technology serve as critical pathways through which corporate digital transformation influences carbon intensity. (3) The analysis of driving effect suggests that the digital transformation significantly curtails the carbon emission intensity of both upstream and downstream enterprises as well as those within the same industry and geographical region, through industrial linkage and the cohort effect. (4) Heterogeneity analysis elucidates that the digital transformation of enterprises in regions with stronger government environmental regulations has a markedly more pronounced effect on reducing the carbon emission intensity. …”
-
2328
Analysis of peer effects.
Published 2024“…The findings reveal that: (1) At this stage, digital transformation in listed companies effectively reduces their carbon intensity, but the relationship between the two is not linear; instead, it exhibits a U-shaped trajectory, initially decreasing then increasing. (2) Analysis of mechanism indicates that costs associated with environmental governance and innovations in green technology serve as critical pathways through which corporate digital transformation influences carbon intensity. (3) The analysis of driving effect suggests that the digital transformation significantly curtails the carbon emission intensity of both upstream and downstream enterprises as well as those within the same industry and geographical region, through industrial linkage and the cohort effect. (4) Heterogeneity analysis elucidates that the digital transformation of enterprises in regions with stronger government environmental regulations has a markedly more pronounced effect on reducing the carbon emission intensity. …”
-
2329
-
2330
-
2331
-
2332
-
2333
-
2334
-
2335
Kinetic characteristics.
Published 2025“…Additionally, KT resulted in increased peak knee flexion angle (<i>P</i> = 0.002, <i>P</i> = 0.011) and peak ankle dorsiflexion angle (<i>P</i> <0.001, <i>P</i> = 0.005) relative to both NT and PT. KT also significantly reduced mediolateral center of pressure (COP) displacement (<i>P</i> = 0.001) and average velocity of mediolateral COP displacement (<i>P</i> = 0.033) in comparison to NT. …”
-
2336
Raw data.
Published 2025“…Additionally, KT resulted in increased peak knee flexion angle (<i>P</i> = 0.002, <i>P</i> = 0.011) and peak ankle dorsiflexion angle (<i>P</i> <0.001, <i>P</i> = 0.005) relative to both NT and PT. KT also significantly reduced mediolateral center of pressure (COP) displacement (<i>P</i> = 0.001) and average velocity of mediolateral COP displacement (<i>P</i> = 0.033) in comparison to NT. …”
-
2337
Schematic of the Y-balance anterior task.
Published 2025“…Additionally, KT resulted in increased peak knee flexion angle (<i>P</i> = 0.002, <i>P</i> = 0.011) and peak ankle dorsiflexion angle (<i>P</i> <0.001, <i>P</i> = 0.005) relative to both NT and PT. KT also significantly reduced mediolateral center of pressure (COP) displacement (<i>P</i> = 0.001) and average velocity of mediolateral COP displacement (<i>P</i> = 0.033) in comparison to NT. …”
-
2338
Demographic characteristics of the two groups.
Published 2025“…Additionally, KT resulted in increased peak knee flexion angle (<i>P</i> = 0.002, <i>P</i> = 0.011) and peak ankle dorsiflexion angle (<i>P</i> <0.001, <i>P</i> = 0.005) relative to both NT and PT. KT also significantly reduced mediolateral center of pressure (COP) displacement (<i>P</i> = 0.001) and average velocity of mediolateral COP displacement (<i>P</i> = 0.033) in comparison to NT. …”
-
2339
Optimizing the plastic injection molding process and reducing warpage through response surface methodology
Published 2025“…The warpage prediction model, significant influencing factors, and optimization have been found. …”
-
2340
Regulating Effects of Three Polysaccharides on Gut Microbiota in Felines and Canines: Insights from <i>In Vitro</i> Digestion, Fecal Fermentation, and Lactic Acid Bacterial Ferment...
Published 2025“…The FU produced the highest lactate concentration. The YG significantly increased SCFA levels, especially in canines, surpassing fructooligosaccharides. …”