Search alternatives:
significantly restored » significantly reduced (Expand Search), significantly related (Expand Search), significantly altered (Expand Search)
significant decrease » significant increase (Expand Search), significantly increased (Expand Search)
restored decrease » reported decrease (Expand Search)
significantly restored » significantly reduced (Expand Search), significantly related (Expand Search), significantly altered (Expand Search)
significant decrease » significant increase (Expand Search), significantly increased (Expand Search)
restored decrease » reported decrease (Expand Search)
-
301
-
302
-
303
-
304
-
305
-
306
General data comparison.
Published 2024“…The proportion of patients under 60 years of age during the pandemic was higher than that after the pandemic. There was no significant difference in the average hospital stay between patients during and after the pandemic (P>0.05). …”
-
307
The epidemic period group.
Published 2024“…The proportion of patients under 60 years of age during the pandemic was higher than that after the pandemic. There was no significant difference in the average hospital stay between patients during and after the pandemic (P>0.05). …”
-
308
Original data.
Published 2024“…The proportion of patients under 60 years of age during the pandemic was higher than that after the pandemic. There was no significant difference in the average hospital stay between patients during and after the pandemic (P>0.05). …”
-
309
Post-epidemic group.
Published 2024“…The proportion of patients under 60 years of age during the pandemic was higher than that after the pandemic. There was no significant difference in the average hospital stay between patients during and after the pandemic (P>0.05). …”
-
310
Comparison of admissions by department.
Published 2024“…The proportion of patients under 60 years of age during the pandemic was higher than that after the pandemic. There was no significant difference in the average hospital stay between patients during and after the pandemic (P>0.05). …”
-
311
Land use intensity classes standard.
Published 2025“…(ii) The karst habitat quality index decreased from 0.7751 to 0.74085, showing an overall downward trend. …”
-
312
Land use transfer matrix 1990-2020 (km<sup>2</sup>).
Published 2025“…(ii) The karst habitat quality index decreased from 0.7751 to 0.74085, showing an overall downward trend. …”
-
313
Study area habitat quality LISA clustering map.
Published 2025“…(ii) The karst habitat quality index decreased from 0.7751 to 0.74085, showing an overall downward trend. …”
-
314
Spato-temporal changes in land use types.
Published 2025“…(ii) The karst habitat quality index decreased from 0.7751 to 0.74085, showing an overall downward trend. …”
-
315
Pattern indices of landscape levels.
Published 2025“…(ii) The karst habitat quality index decreased from 0.7751 to 0.74085, showing an overall downward trend. …”
-
316
Type level landscape index changes in 1990-2020.
Published 2025“…(ii) The karst habitat quality index decreased from 0.7751 to 0.74085, showing an overall downward trend. …”
-
317
Location map of the study area.
Published 2025“…(ii) The karst habitat quality index decreased from 0.7751 to 0.74085, showing an overall downward trend. …”
-
318
Data source.
Published 2025“…(ii) The karst habitat quality index decreased from 0.7751 to 0.74085, showing an overall downward trend. …”
-
319
Research Technology Flow Chart.
Published 2025“…(ii) The karst habitat quality index decreased from 0.7751 to 0.74085, showing an overall downward trend. …”
-
320
Effects of Semaglutide and Dapagliflozin on Neuronal Integrity, Apoptosis, and LRP1 Expression in the Hippocampal CA1 Region of T2DM Mice.
Published 2025“…(D) Quantitative analysis of LRP1 expression shows significantly decreased levels in the T2DM group compared to control (***<i>p</i> < 0.001), while both semaglutide and da<i>p</i>agliflozin treatment significantly restored LRP1 expression compared to the T2DM group (***<i>p</i> < 0.001). …”