Showing 141 - 160 results of 52,903 for search '(( significant decrease increased ) OR ( significant ((largest decrease) OR (larger decrease)) ))', query time: 1.25s Refine Results
  1. 141
  2. 142

    Traits at cellular, leaf, and whole-plant scales which were significantly different [increased (↑) or decreased (↓)] or non-significant between tolerant and sensitive cultivars in the N-deficient treatment. by Ranjeeta Adhikari (9905958)

    Published 2023
    “…<p>Traits at cellular, leaf, and whole-plant scales which were significantly different [increased (↑) or decreased (↓)] or non-significant between tolerant and sensitive cultivars in the N-deficient treatment.…”
  3. 143
  4. 144

    Perioperative factors associated with differences in adjusted hospitalization costs; all displayed factors are significantly associated with increased or decreased adjusted costs. by Saad Mallick (17283479)

    Published 2024
    “…<p>Perioperative factors associated with differences in adjusted hospitalization costs; all displayed factors are significantly associated with increased or decreased adjusted costs.…”
  5. 145
  6. 146
  7. 147
  8. 148
  9. 149
  10. 150
  11. 151
  12. 152
  13. 153
  14. 154
  15. 155
  16. 156

    Proteins from volcano plot which had notable increases or decreases listed in order of greatest to least significance (adjusted p-values). by Eiman Y. Ibrahim (10731078)

    Published 2022
    “…<p>Proteins from volcano plot which had notable increases or decreases listed in order of greatest to least significance (adjusted p-values).…”
  17. 157

    Spatial information of excitatory neurons in APP/PS1 mice are decreased in dCA1 and vCA1. by Udaysankar Chockanathan (18510288)

    Published 2024
    “…The spatial information in dCA1 was significantly larger than circularly shuffled spike trains with similar mean firing rates for C57BL/6 mice (mean ± std: empirical = 0.134 ± 0.050, shuffled = 0.123 ± 0.035, p < 0.005, two-sided Wilcoxon rank-sum test, n<sub>empirical</sub> = 229 units from 5 recording sessions, n<sub>shuffled</sub> = 22900 simulated units from 5 recording sessions), but not for APP/PS1 mice (mean ± std: empirical = 0.132 ± 0.054, shuffled = 0.124 ± .054, p = 0.13, two-sided Wilcoxon rank-sum test, n<sub>empirical</sub> = 124 units from 4 recording sessions, n<sub>shuffled</sub> = 12400 simulated units from 4 recording sessions). …”
  18. 158
  19. 159
  20. 160