Search alternatives:
significant decrease » significant increase (Expand Search), significantly increased (Expand Search)
decrease increased » degree increased (Expand Search), disease increases (Expand Search)
significant bias » significant based (Expand Search), significant gap (Expand Search), significant degs (Expand Search)
bias decrease » sizes decrease (Expand Search), bias increases (Expand Search), a decrease (Expand Search)
significant decrease » significant increase (Expand Search), significantly increased (Expand Search)
decrease increased » degree increased (Expand Search), disease increases (Expand Search)
significant bias » significant based (Expand Search), significant gap (Expand Search), significant degs (Expand Search)
bias decrease » sizes decrease (Expand Search), bias increases (Expand Search), a decrease (Expand Search)
-
61
-
62
-
63
-
64
-
65
-
66
-
67
-
68
-
69
-
70
-
71
-
72
-
73
QUIPS risk of bias assessment.
Published 2023“…Exercise load and anaerobic threshold did not correlate with morbidity or mortality. There was significant heterogeneity between studies.</p><p>Conclusions</p><p>Estimates of cardiopulmonary fitness as evidenced by higher peak, measured and as a percentage of predicted, were associated with decreased morbidity and mortality. …”
-
74
Publication bias of the risk of all groups.
Published 2025“…A fixed-effects model was applied if P > 0.1 and I<sup>2</sup> ≤ 50%; otherwise, a random-effects model was used to account for significant heterogeneity Publication bias was assessed using funnel plots and Egger’s test. …”
-
75
-
76
-
77
Decreased regulatory T cells and increased monocytes are observed in peripheral blood of obese mice.
Published 2022Subjects: -
78
-
79
-
80
Familiar-odor-biased PNs and LNs are novelty and familiarity detectors.
Published 2022“…Similar phenomena were also observed among the familiar-odor biased LNs (<b>C2</b>). In novel-odor biased PNs and LNs, the familiar and novel odors did not produce contrasting changes after the familiarization process; none of the comparing pairs showed significant familiarity and novelty effects (<b>D1, D2</b>, McNemar test).…”