Showing 1 - 20 results of 12,286 for search '(( significant decrease post ) OR ( ((significant bias) OR (significant spatial)) decrease ))', query time: 0.43s Refine Results
  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4
  5. 5

    Risk of bias summary by article. by Manuela Llano-León (14599800)

    Published 2023
    “…Despite high heterogeneity among the articles regarding treatment received, type of tumor reported, and techniques used to evaluate immune infiltrate, we found a significant decrease of TILs and FoxP3 expression after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. …”
  6. 6
  7. 7
  8. 8

    Risk of bias assessment. by Telford Y. Yeung (15361277)

    Published 2023
    “…</p><p>Results</p><p>Twenty-six RCTs of 3349 preterm infants, in which half of the studies had low risk of bias, were included. STC decreased the risk of BPD in survivors compared to controls (17 RCTs; N = 2408; relative risk (RR) = 0.66; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.51 to 0.85; number needed to treat for an additional beneficial outcome (NNTB) = 13; CoE: moderate). …”
  9. 9
  10. 10

    Spatial information is significantly decreased in dCA1 and vCA1 in APP/PS1 mice. by Udaysankar Chockanathan (18510288)

    Published 2024
    “…(C) In vCA1, spatial information was decreased in APP/PS1 mice relative to C57BL/6 controls (mean ± std: C57BL/6 = 0.138 ± 0.065, APP/PS1 = 0.112 ± 0.035, p < 10<sup>−6</sup>, two-sided Wilcoxon rank-sum test, n<sub>C57BL/6</sub> = 689 units from 6 recording sessions, n<sub>APP/PS1</sub> = 651 units from 8 recording sessions). …”
  11. 11
  12. 12
  13. 13
  14. 14
  15. 15
  16. 16

    Risk of bias summary. by Duc Tran Quang (20564967)

    Published 2025
    “…The observed decrease in body weight could be partially attributed to factors influencing energy balance, as evidenced by the significantly lower mean calorie intake at the end of the intervention (1694.71 kcal/day, 95% CI: 1498.57–1890.85) compared to the baseline intake (2000.64 kcal/day, 95% CI: 1830–2172.98), despite the absence of intentional efforts to restrict energy intake by the participants. …”
  17. 17
  18. 18

    Risk of bias graph. by Xiaojuan Yang (794374)

    Published 2025
    “…The treatment ranking revealed that massage therapy demonstrated the most significant efficacy in reducing Vancouver Scar Scale score (surface under the cumulative ranking curve [SUCRA] = 89.0%), CO<sub>2</sub> laser therapy exhibited the highest efficacy in decreasing scar thickness (SUCRA = 96.8%), and extracorporeal shock wave therapy + routine treatment showed the most significant efficacy in reducing Visual Analogue Scale score (SUCRA = 58.6%).…”
  19. 19
  20. 20