Showing 161 - 180 results of 42,186 for search '(( significant decrease post ) OR ( significant ((we decrease) OR (greater decrease)) ))', query time: 1.12s Refine Results
  1. 161
  2. 162
  3. 163
  4. 164
  5. 165

    PRISMA checklist. by Giacomo Stroffolini (11716410)

    Published 2023
    “…</p><p>Conclusions/Significance</p><p>Our findings demonstrate a significant decrease of <i>S</i>. …”
  6. 166

    PRISMA flow diagram. by Giacomo Stroffolini (11716410)

    Published 2023
    “…</p><p>Conclusions/Significance</p><p>Our findings demonstrate a significant decrease of <i>S</i>. …”
  7. 167

    Main characteristics of included papers. by Giacomo Stroffolini (11716410)

    Published 2023
    “…</p><p>Conclusions/Significance</p><p>Our findings demonstrate a significant decrease of <i>S</i>. …”
  8. 168
  9. 169

    Enhanced Photochemical Reactivity of Natural Organic Matter Post-Peroxymonosulfate Oxidation by Teng Zhang (457128)

    Published 2024
    “…The alterations in NOM characteristics bear significance for the degradation of micropollutants in sunlit surface waters.…”
  10. 170
  11. 171
  12. 172
  13. 173
  14. 174
  15. 175
  16. 176
  17. 177
  18. 178

    Baseline characteristics of the participants. by Ranya Ameur (18475956)

    Published 2024
    “…Glucose level decreased in TRE-HIFT compared to HIFT (p<0.01). Systolic blood pressure decreased significantly in both TRE-HIFT and HIFT groups compared to TRE group (p = 0.04 and p = 0.02; respectively).…”
  19. 179

    Study design. by Ranya Ameur (18475956)

    Published 2024
    “…Glucose level decreased in TRE-HIFT compared to HIFT (p<0.01). Systolic blood pressure decreased significantly in both TRE-HIFT and HIFT groups compared to TRE group (p = 0.04 and p = 0.02; respectively).…”
  20. 180

    Study flow chart. by Ranya Ameur (18475956)

    Published 2024
    “…Glucose level decreased in TRE-HIFT compared to HIFT (p<0.01). Systolic blood pressure decreased significantly in both TRE-HIFT and HIFT groups compared to TRE group (p = 0.04 and p = 0.02; respectively).…”