Search alternatives:
significant decrease » significant increase (Expand Search), significantly increased (Expand Search)
significant bias » significant based (Expand Search), significant gap (Expand Search), significant degs (Expand Search)
decrease risk » increased risk (Expand Search), increases risk (Expand Search), disease risk (Expand Search)
bias decrease » sizes decrease (Expand Search), bias increases (Expand Search), a decrease (Expand Search)
significant decrease » significant increase (Expand Search), significantly increased (Expand Search)
significant bias » significant based (Expand Search), significant gap (Expand Search), significant degs (Expand Search)
decrease risk » increased risk (Expand Search), increases risk (Expand Search), disease risk (Expand Search)
bias decrease » sizes decrease (Expand Search), bias increases (Expand Search), a decrease (Expand Search)
-
101
-
102
-
103
-
104
-
105
Bias risk assessment of included studies.
Published 2025“…The quality of the studies was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool and the modified Jadad scale. Statistical analysis, sensitivity analysis, and publication bias assessment were performed using Stata 17.0 software.…”
-
106
-
107
-
108
-
109
-
110
-
111
-
112
-
113
-
114
-
115
-
116
-
117
-
118
-
119
Nineteen SNPs with significant association (<i>P < </i>5 × 10<sup>−8</sup>) with risk on minJSW decrease in knee OA.
Published 2025“…<p>Nineteen SNPs with significant association (<i>P < </i>5 × 10<sup>−8</sup>) with risk on minJSW decrease in knee OA.…”
-
120
Risk of bias across 22 included studie.
Published 2024“…</p><p>Results</p><p>A meta-analysis of 22 RCTs (n = 3,463) showed that ketamine/esketamine significantly decreased PPD risk at 1- (risk ratio [RR], 0.41; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.3–0.57) and 4–6-week (RR, 0.47; 95%CI, 0.35–0.63) follow-ups. …”