بدائل البحث:
significant decrease » significant increase (توسيع البحث), significantly increased (توسيع البحث)
decrease risk » increased risk (توسيع البحث), increases risk (توسيع البحث), disease risk (توسيع البحث)
significant decrease » significant increase (توسيع البحث), significantly increased (توسيع البحث)
decrease risk » increased risk (توسيع البحث), increases risk (توسيع البحث), disease risk (توسيع البحث)
-
81
-
82
-
83
-
84
-
85
-
86
-
87
-
88
<i>RR</i> of the spatio-temporal interaction effect for Human Rabies in China from 2004–2020.
منشور في 2024الموضوعات: -
89
-
90
Annual average incidence rates of human rabies in provinces from 2004–2020.
منشور في 2024الموضوعات: -
91
-
92
Evaluation of the fitting performance of spatio-temporal interaction models.
منشور في 2024الموضوعات: -
93
-
94
-
95
-
96
Image_2_Reaching and maintaining higher dietary diversity is associated with decreased risk of all-cause mortality: A longitudinal study from the China Health and Nutrition Survey....
منشور في 2022"…Cox proportional hazards regression models were applied to investigate the association between the DDS trajectories and the risk of death. Only class 4, which was characterized by the highest and stable DDS, had significant reduced risk of all-cause mortality of 71.0% (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.29; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.10–0.83), 68% (HR: 0.32; 95% CI: 0.11–0.89), and 66.0% (HR: 0.34; 95% CI: 0.12–0.94), compared to classes 1, 2, and 3, respectively, while the first three classes showed no significant inter-class differences. …"
-
97
Image_1_Reaching and maintaining higher dietary diversity is associated with decreased risk of all-cause mortality: A longitudinal study from the China Health and Nutrition Survey....
منشور في 2022"…Cox proportional hazards regression models were applied to investigate the association between the DDS trajectories and the risk of death. Only class 4, which was characterized by the highest and stable DDS, had significant reduced risk of all-cause mortality of 71.0% (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.29; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.10–0.83), 68% (HR: 0.32; 95% CI: 0.11–0.89), and 66.0% (HR: 0.34; 95% CI: 0.12–0.94), compared to classes 1, 2, and 3, respectively, while the first three classes showed no significant inter-class differences. …"
-
98
-
99
-
100