Search alternatives:
significant decrease » significant increase (Expand Search), significantly increased (Expand Search)
significant event » significant effect (Expand Search), significant level (Expand Search), significant effects (Expand Search)
event decrease » cement decreases (Expand Search), point decrease (Expand Search), levels decreased (Expand Search)
decrease risk » increased risk (Expand Search), increases risk (Expand Search), disease risk (Expand Search)
Showing 61 - 80 results of 15,218 for search '(( significant decrease risk ) OR ( significant event decrease ))', query time: 0.60s Refine Results
  1. 61
    Cluster ranking plot of surface under cumulative ranking curves (SUCRA) of disease recurrence and adverse drug events for eradication therapy of melioidosis.

    Cluster ranking plot of surface under cumulative ranking curves (SUCRA) of disease recurrence and adverse drug events for eradication therapy of melioidosis. by Thunyarat Anothaisintawee (840641)

    Published 2023
    Subjects:
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  2. 62
    Forest Plot of the incidence of adverse events in the MSCs therapy group and control group.

    Forest Plot of the incidence of adverse events in the MSCs therapy group and control group. by Luz Estella Mesa (8339283)

    Published 2023
    Subjects:
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  3. 63
    Forest Plot of the incidence of serious adverse events in MSCs therapy group and control group.

    Forest Plot of the incidence of serious adverse events in MSCs therapy group and control group. by Luz Estella Mesa (8339283)

    Published 2023
    Subjects:
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  4. 64
    L’Abbé plot for the incidence of adverse events in the MSCs therapy group and control group.

    L’Abbé plot for the incidence of adverse events in the MSCs therapy group and control group. by Luz Estella Mesa (8339283)

    Published 2023
    Subjects:
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  5. 65
    Risk of bias assessment in the non-RCTs of Wang, 2013 –ROBINS-I tool.

    Risk of bias assessment in the non-RCTs of Wang, 2013 –ROBINS-I tool. by Luz Estella Mesa (8339283)

    Published 2023
    Subjects:
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  6. 66
    Forest Plot of the incidence of non-serious adverse events in MSCs therapy group and control group.

    Forest Plot of the incidence of non-serious adverse events in MSCs therapy group and control group. by Luz Estella Mesa (8339283)

    Published 2023
    Subjects:
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  7. 67
    Risk of bias assessment of included RCTs–Cochrane RoB tool 2.0.

    Risk of bias assessment of included RCTs–Cochrane RoB tool 2.0. by Luz Estella Mesa (8339283)

    Published 2023
    Subjects:
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  8. 68
    Estimated changes in risk of leptospirosis, Salvador, Brazil, 1996–2010.

    Estimated changes in risk of leptospirosis, Salvador, Brazil, 1996–2010. by Marcelo Cunha (12400935)

    Published 2022
    Subjects:
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  9. 69
    Mean scores compared with paired-samples <i>t</i>-test (and related effect sizes) at pre- and post-test.

    Mean scores compared with paired-samples <i>t</i>-test (and related effect sizes) at pre- and post-test. by Maria Anna Donati (6735548)

    Published 2022
    Subjects:
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  10. 70
    Mean scores compared with paired-samples <i>t</i>-test (and related effect sizes) at pre- and post-test (<i>n</i> = 900).

    Mean scores compared with paired-samples <i>t</i>-test (and related effect sizes) at pre- and post-test (<i>n</i> = 900). by Maria Anna Donati (6735548)

    Published 2022
    Subjects:
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  11. 71
    Mean scores compared with paired-samples <i>t</i>-test (and related effect sizes) at pre- and post-test by age groups (<i>n</i> = 900).

    Mean scores compared with paired-samples <i>t</i>-test (and related effect sizes) at pre- and post-test by age groups (<i>n</i> = 900). by Maria Anna Donati (6735548)

    Published 2022
    Subjects:
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  12. 72
    Mean scores compared with paired-samples <i>t</i>-test (and related effect sizes) at pre- and follow-up (<i>n</i> = 662).

    Mean scores compared with paired-samples <i>t</i>-test (and related effect sizes) at pre- and follow-up (<i>n</i> = 662). by Maria Anna Donati (6735548)

    Published 2022
    Subjects:
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  13. 73
    Percentage of correct responses for each item of the achievement test.

    Percentage of correct responses for each item of the achievement test. by Maria Anna Donati (6735548)

    Published 2022
    Subjects:
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  14. 74
    Mean scores compared with paired-samples <i>t</i>-test (and related effect sizes) at pre- and follow-up by gender (<i>n</i> = 662).

    Mean scores compared with paired-samples <i>t</i>-test (and related effect sizes) at pre- and follow-up by gender (<i>n</i> = 662). by Maria Anna Donati (6735548)

    Published 2022
    Subjects:
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  15. 75
    Mean scores compared with paired-samples <i>t</i>-test (and related effect sizes) at pre- and post-test by gender (<i>n</i> = 900).

    Mean scores compared with paired-samples <i>t</i>-test (and related effect sizes) at pre- and post-test by gender (<i>n</i> = 900). by Maria Anna Donati (6735548)

    Published 2022
    Subjects:
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  16. 76
    S1 File -

    S1 File - by Maria Anna Donati (6735548)

    Published 2022
    Subjects:
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  17. 77
    Objectives for each meeting of the training course for the intervention providers.

    Objectives for each meeting of the training course for the intervention providers. by Maria Anna Donati (6735548)

    Published 2022
    Subjects:
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  18. 78
    Mean scores compared with paired-samples <i>t</i>-test (and related effect sizes) at pre- and follow-up by age group (<i>n</i> = 662).

    Mean scores compared with paired-samples <i>t</i>-test (and related effect sizes) at pre- and follow-up by age group (<i>n</i> = 662). by Maria Anna Donati (6735548)

    Published 2022
    Subjects:
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  19. 79
    Mean scores for each item of the training course’s satisfaction test.

    Mean scores for each item of the training course’s satisfaction test. by Maria Anna Donati (6735548)

    Published 2022
    Subjects:
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  20. 80
    Baseline characteristics of study cohort (n, %) showing the probability of any differences between event free, stroke and all-cause mortality groups between those exposed to Warfarin or DOACs.

    Baseline characteristics of study cohort (n, %) showing the probability of any differences between event free, stroke and all-cause mortality groups between those exposed to Warfar... by Simon de Lusignan (2416)

    Published 2022
    Subjects:
    Save to List
    Saved in:

Search Tools: