Showing 101 - 120 results of 13,595 for search '(( significant decrease risk ) OR ( significant gender decrease ))', query time: 0.55s Refine Results
  1. 101
  2. 102
  3. 103

    Gender differences. by Nerea Aldunate (5056967)

    Published 2024
    “…The study also explores gender differences and age. Results reveal positive correlations between good mentalizing and empathy, particularly cognitive empathy, supporting the significance of positive mentalization in empathy. …”
  4. 104
  5. 105
  6. 106

    QUIPS risk of bias assessment. by Nabeela Arbee-Kalidas (17598969)

    Published 2023
    “…Higher estimates of peak, measured and as a percentagege of predicted, showed significant associations with a lower risk of mortality [MD: 3.66, 95% CI: 0.88; 6.43 and MD: 16.49, 95% CI: 6.92; 26.07] and fewer complications [MD: 2.06, 95% CI: 1.12; 3.00 and MD: 9.82, 95% CI: 5.88; 13.76]. …”
  7. 107
  8. 108
  9. 109
  10. 110
  11. 111
  12. 112
  13. 113
  14. 114
  15. 115
  16. 116

    S1 Graphical abstract - by Aman Goyal (19231397)

    Published 2025
    “…</p><p>Conclusions</p><p>Our analysis showed a significant decrease in mortality from paroxysmal tachycardia since 1999, although there has been a slight increase in recent years. …”
  17. 117
  18. 118
  19. 119

    Image_2_Serum Zinc-α2-Glycoprotein Levels Were Decreased in Patients With Premature Coronary Artery Disease.JPEG by Meijuan Liu (4924417)

    Published 2019
    “…The combination of ZAG with other clinical variables including age, gender, BMI, SBP, FBG, TC, HDL-C, Cr, and Urea had significantly improved the diagnosis accuracy with a sensitivity of 82.6%, a specificity of 95.0%, and AUC of 0.957 (95% CI, 0.940–0.975, p < 0.05).…”
  20. 120

    Image_1_Serum Zinc-α2-Glycoprotein Levels Were Decreased in Patients With Premature Coronary Artery Disease.JPEG by Meijuan Liu (4924417)

    Published 2019
    “…The combination of ZAG with other clinical variables including age, gender, BMI, SBP, FBG, TC, HDL-C, Cr, and Urea had significantly improved the diagnosis accuracy with a sensitivity of 82.6%, a specificity of 95.0%, and AUC of 0.957 (95% CI, 0.940–0.975, p < 0.05).…”