Search alternatives:
significant decrease » significant increase (Expand Search), significantly increased (Expand Search)
significant mean » significant main (Expand Search), significant gap (Expand Search), significant degs (Expand Search)
decrease risk » increased risk (Expand Search), increases risk (Expand Search), disease risk (Expand Search)
mean decrease » a decrease (Expand Search)
Showing 41 - 60 results of 22,950 for search '(( significant decrease risk ) OR ( significant mean decrease ))', query time: 0.49s Refine Results
  1. 41
    Forest plots showing a significant improvement in the hs-CRP in the experiment group compared with the control group.

    Forest plots showing a significant improvement in the hs-CRP in the experiment group compared with the control group. by Ziyi Li (349831)

    Published 2023
    Subjects:
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  2. 42
    Fold changes were calculated as mean condition B/mean condition A, after mTIC normalization.

    Fold changes were calculated as mean condition B/mean condition A, after mTIC normalization. by Manuel A. Cornejo (11636656)

    Published 2021
    Subjects:
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  3. 43
    Comparison of the mean and standard deviation of fall prevention measures checklist before and after the intervention.

    Comparison of the mean and standard deviation of fall prevention measures checklist before and after the intervention. by Shoeleh Rahimi (19065677)

    Published 2024
    Subjects:
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  4. 44
    Mean scores compared with paired-samples <i>t</i>-test (and related effect sizes) at pre- and post-test.

    Mean scores compared with paired-samples <i>t</i>-test (and related effect sizes) at pre- and post-test. by Maria Anna Donati (6735548)

    Published 2022
    Subjects:
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  5. 45
    Risk of bias assessment.

    Risk of bias assessment. by Delai Zheng (18468980)

    Published 2024
    Subjects:
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  6. 46
    Mean and standard deviation of the three dimensions and of the global score of STS before COVID-19.

    Mean and standard deviation of the three dimensions and of the global score of STS before COVID-19. by Martina Gnerre (12329356)

    Published 2022
    Subjects:
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  7. 47
    Mean and standard deviation of the three dimensions and of the global score of STS during COVID-19.

    Mean and standard deviation of the three dimensions and of the global score of STS during COVID-19. by Martina Gnerre (12329356)

    Published 2022
    Subjects:
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  8. 48
    Mean and standard deviation of the three dimensions and of the global score of STS after COVID-19.

    Mean and standard deviation of the three dimensions and of the global score of STS after COVID-19. by Martina Gnerre (12329356)

    Published 2022
    Subjects:
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  9. 49
    Forest plots showing a significant improvement in the NT-proBNP in the experiment group compared with the control group.

    Forest plots showing a significant improvement in the NT-proBNP in the experiment group compared with the control group. by Ziyi Li (349831)

    Published 2023
    Subjects:
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  10. 50
    Related inflammation evaluation indexes before and after operation (mean±standard deviation).

    Related inflammation evaluation indexes before and after operation (mean±standard deviation). by Na Wang (193263)

    Published 2024
    Subjects:
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  11. 51
    Baseline data of each group (mean±standard deviation)/n (%)/(M(IQR)).

    Baseline data of each group (mean±standard deviation)/n (%)/(M(IQR)). by Na Wang (193263)

    Published 2024
    Subjects:
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  12. 52
    Forest plots illustrate the mean difference in; (A) creatinine clearance, (B) eGFR, (C) BUN, and (D) shows relative risk in ARF.

    Forest plots illustrate the mean difference in; (A) creatinine clearance, (B) eGFR, (C) BUN, and (D) shows relative risk in ARF. by Mohamed R. Abdelraouf (21501468)

    Published 2025
    Subjects:
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  13. 53
    Forest plots illustrate the mean difference in creatinine level with subgroup analysis based on patients’ age.

    Forest plots illustrate the mean difference in creatinine level with subgroup analysis based on patients’ age. by Mohamed R. Abdelraouf (21501468)

    Published 2025
    Subjects:
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  14. 54
    Relevant follow-up evaluation indicators after operation (mean±standard deviation)/n (%).

    Relevant follow-up evaluation indicators after operation (mean±standard deviation)/n (%). by Na Wang (193263)

    Published 2024
    Subjects:
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  15. 55
    Mean scores compared with paired-samples <i>t</i>-test (and related effect sizes) at pre- and post-test (<i>n</i> = 900).

    Mean scores compared with paired-samples <i>t</i>-test (and related effect sizes) at pre- and post-test (<i>n</i> = 900). by Maria Anna Donati (6735548)

    Published 2022
    Subjects:
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  16. 56
    Mean scores compared with paired-samples <i>t</i>-test (and related effect sizes) at pre- and follow-up (<i>n</i> = 662).

    Mean scores compared with paired-samples <i>t</i>-test (and related effect sizes) at pre- and follow-up (<i>n</i> = 662). by Maria Anna Donati (6735548)

    Published 2022
    Subjects:
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  17. 57
    Mean values of physical parameters of rock samples.

    Mean values of physical parameters of rock samples. by Dengke Yang (842532)

    Published 2025
    Subjects:
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  18. 58
    Mean scores compared with paired-samples <i>t</i>-test (and related effect sizes) at pre- and follow-up by gender (<i>n</i> = 662).

    Mean scores compared with paired-samples <i>t</i>-test (and related effect sizes) at pre- and follow-up by gender (<i>n</i> = 662). by Maria Anna Donati (6735548)

    Published 2022
    Subjects:
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  19. 59
    Mean scores compared with paired-samples <i>t</i>-test (and related effect sizes) at pre- and post-test by gender (<i>n</i> = 900).

    Mean scores compared with paired-samples <i>t</i>-test (and related effect sizes) at pre- and post-test by gender (<i>n</i> = 900). by Maria Anna Donati (6735548)

    Published 2022
    Subjects:
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  20. 60
    Bias risk assessments for each RCT study.

    Bias risk assessments for each RCT study. by Xin Liu (43569)

    Published 2025
    Subjects:
    Save to List
    Saved in:

Search Tools: