Search alternatives:
significant decrease » significant increase (Expand Search), significantly increased (Expand Search)
decrease risk » increased risk (Expand Search), increases risk (Expand Search), disease risk (Expand Search)
teer decrease » mean decrease (Expand Search), greater decrease (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
significant decrease » significant increase (Expand Search), significantly increased (Expand Search)
decrease risk » increased risk (Expand Search), increases risk (Expand Search), disease risk (Expand Search)
teer decrease » mean decrease (Expand Search), greater decrease (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
-
41
-
42
-
43
-
44
-
45
-
46
-
47
Y-27632 collaborated with BA to attenuate the increase in the integrity and decrease in the permeability of epithelial barrier injury induced by LPS in Caco2 monolayers.
Published 2024“…<p>(<b>A)</b> Y-27632 collaborated with BA to attenuate the effect of LPS on TEER in Caco2 cells on days 1–22. …”
-
48
-
49
-
50
-
51
QUIPS risk of bias assessment.
Published 2023“…Higher estimates of peak, measured and as a percentagege of predicted, showed significant associations with a lower risk of mortality [MD: 3.66, 95% CI: 0.88; 6.43 and MD: 16.49, 95% CI: 6.92; 26.07] and fewer complications [MD: 2.06, 95% CI: 1.12; 3.00 and MD: 9.82, 95% CI: 5.88; 13.76]. …”
-
52
-
53
NgR1 KO mice exhibited an increase in excitatory synapses and a decrease in inhibitory synapses, indicating an imbalance of synaptic transmission.
Published 2025“…The inhibitory synaptic density of NgR1 mice showed a significant decrease when compared to WT mice (***P < 0.001). …”
-
54
-
55
-
56
-
57
Data_Sheet_1_Influenza vaccination is associated with a decreased risk of atrial fibrillation: A systematic review and meta-analysis.docx
Published 2022“…Additionally, subgroup analysis showed a decreased risk of atrial fibrillation (AF) (OR: 0.94, 95% CI: 0.90–0.98; P = 0.006; I<sup>2</sup> = 0%) and a non-significant but positive trend concerning ventricular arrhythmias (VAs) (OR: 0.68, 95% CI: 0.42–1.11; P = 0.12; I<sup>2</sup> = 85%) after influenza vaccination.…”
-
58
Analysis of the Nugent score before (T=0) and after (T=1) the use of the vaginal gel. Number of participants and respective percentages of Nugent scores before and after the intervention. A statistically significant decrease in Nugent scores was observed after the intervention (p value =0.0047).
Published 2025“…Number of participants and respective percentages of Nugent scores before and after the intervention. A statistically significant decrease in Nugent scores was observed after the intervention (p value =0.0047).…”
-
59
-
60