Search alternatives:
significant degs » significant genes (Expand Search), significant adverse (Expand Search), significant cause (Expand Search)
marked decrease » marked increase (Expand Search)
degs decrease » mean decrease (Expand Search), teer decrease (Expand Search), we decrease (Expand Search)
significant degs » significant genes (Expand Search), significant adverse (Expand Search), significant cause (Expand Search)
marked decrease » marked increase (Expand Search)
degs decrease » mean decrease (Expand Search), teer decrease (Expand Search), we decrease (Expand Search)
-
1
-
2
-
3
-
4
Enrichment Analysis Based on Ferroptosis-Related Differentially Expressed Genes.
Published 2025Subjects: -
5
-
6
-
7
-
8
-
9
-
10
Differential Gene Expression Associated with Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease.
Published 2025Subjects: -
11
-
12
Cinacalcet administered early in the inactive phase markedly decrease parathyroid Ki-67 index.
Published 2025“…All groups were compared by Kruskal Wallis test with <i>post hoc</i> test after Dunn with Bonferroni adjustment showing significant decreased Ki-67 labeling index of <i>Cina1</i> compared to <i>Cina2</i> (p = 0.006) and the untreated CKD groups (p = 0.0001 and p = 0.0002, respectively). …”
-
13
-
14
A total of 700 DEGs.
Published 2025“…Additionally, immune cell infiltration analysis revealed correlations between hub DESRGs and CD8 T cells, NK cells, and macrophages. Compared with normal tissues, AAD tissues exhibited a significant decrease in CD8 T cells and an increase in NK cells and macrophages.…”
-
15
-
16
-
17
List of DEGs via FC values.
Published 2024“…In contrast, MII oocytes in the TSD group showed a decrease in the mtDNA copy number and a lower Δψm compared with the controls. …”
-
18
Average of % peptides counts for different classes of proteins at different germination time points and significant p-value indicated as compared to soaked sample (*p< 0.05, **p<0.01, ***p<0.001) for garbanzo trypsinised with shades of green showing increase and red showing decrease with respect to soaked.
Published 2024“…<p>Average of % peptides counts for different classes of proteins at different germination time points and significant p-value indicated as compared to soaked sample (*p< 0.05, **p<0.01, ***p<0.001) for garbanzo trypsinised with shades of green showing increase and red showing decrease with respect to soaked.…”
-
19
Average % peptides counts for different classes of proteins at different germination time points and significant p-value indicated as compared to soaked sample (*p< 0.05, **p<0.01, ***p<0.001) for brown non-trypsinised with shades of green showing increase and red showing decrease with respect to soaked.
Published 2024“…<p>Average % peptides counts for different classes of proteins at different germination time points and significant p-value indicated as compared to soaked sample (*p< 0.05, **p<0.01, ***p<0.001) for brown non-trypsinised with shades of green showing increase and red showing decrease with respect to soaked.…”
-
20
Average of % peptides counts for different classes of proteins at different germination time points and significant p-value indicated as compared to soaked sample (*p< 0.05, **p<0.01, ***p<0.001) for garbanzo non-trypsinised with shades of green showing increase and red showing decrease with respect to soaked.
Published 2024“…<p>Average of % peptides counts for different classes of proteins at different germination time points and significant p-value indicated as compared to soaked sample (*p< 0.05, **p<0.01, ***p<0.001) for garbanzo non-trypsinised with shades of green showing increase and red showing decrease with respect to soaked.…”