Search alternatives:
significant degs » significant genes (Expand Search), significant adverse (Expand Search), significant cause (Expand Search)
degs decrease » mean decrease (Expand Search), teer decrease (Expand Search), we decrease (Expand Search)
time decrease » time increased (Expand Search), sizes decrease (Expand Search), teer decrease (Expand Search)
_ decrease » _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreasing (Expand Search)
significant degs » significant genes (Expand Search), significant adverse (Expand Search), significant cause (Expand Search)
degs decrease » mean decrease (Expand Search), teer decrease (Expand Search), we decrease (Expand Search)
time decrease » time increased (Expand Search), sizes decrease (Expand Search), teer decrease (Expand Search)
_ decrease » _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreasing (Expand Search)
-
1
-
2
-
3
-
4
-
5
-
6
-
7
qPCR verified the expression changes of GO and KEGG pathway enriched sarcopenia related DEGs.
Published 2025Subjects: -
8
-
9
Common DEGs between Antonio and Colorado after MCP application under control condition.
Published 2024Subjects: -
10
-
11
-
12
-
13
Top 10 significant functional annotations of up-regulated DEGs.
Published 2025“…Functional annotations are ordered by decreasing significance, with color indicating significance according to the legend’s color scale, the ratio of genes on the horizontal axis, and DEG count represented by circle size.…”
-
14
Top 10 significant functional annotations of down-regulated DEGs.
Published 2025“…Functional annotations are ordered by decreasing significance, with color indicating significance level based on the legend’s color scale, the ratio of genes on the horizontal axis, and DEG count represented by circle size.…”
-
15
-
16
-
17
-
18
Metabolites with decreasing levels during the development.
Published 2025“…<p>Temporal profiles of polar metabolites and lipids with SCN levels significantly decreasing from E19 to P28. Rhythmicity was determined by eJTK; full or dashed lines depict the profiles that either did or did not pass the significance threshold (FDR-adjusted <i>P</i> < 0.05), respectively.…”
-
19
-
20