Search alternatives:
significant effect » significant impact (Expand Search)
teer decrease » greater decrease (Expand Search)
mean decrease » a decrease (Expand Search)
effect ate » effect due (Expand Search), effect qtl (Expand Search), effect a (Expand Search)
significant effect » significant impact (Expand Search)
teer decrease » greater decrease (Expand Search)
mean decrease » a decrease (Expand Search)
effect ate » effect due (Expand Search), effect qtl (Expand Search), effect a (Expand Search)
-
1
-
2
-
3
Competing risk model for the ATE effect.
Published 2024“…Competing risk models on weighted cohorts were used to derive the Average Treatment Effect (ATE) and the Conditional Average Treatment Effect (CATE) in subgroups of interest. …”
-
4
-
5
-
6
-
7
-
8
-
9
The ATE evaluation values of different SLAM.
Published 2025“…Second, the lightweight YOLOv8n model is integrated to detect and remove feature points in dynamic regions in real-time, effectively reducing the impact of dynamic interference on pose estimation. …”
-
10
Y-27632 collaborated with BA to attenuate the increase in the integrity and decrease in the permeability of epithelial barrier injury induced by LPS in Caco2 monolayers.
Published 2024“…The values are expressed as the means ± SDs and were analyzed according to the variance of the factorial design. **, *** and ****denote <i>p</i> < 0.01, < 0.001 and < 0.0001, respectively; ns = not significant.…”
-
11
-
12
Transepithelial electrical resistance (TEER) (N = 6).
Published 2024“…<p><b>(A)</b> During the cultivation of SMC and ALI we observed significantly differences on day 18 (SMC: 9.61 kΩ*cm<sup>2</sup>; ALI: 7.73 kΩ*cm<sup>2</sup>; p<0.05) and day 25 (SMC: 8.19 kΩ*cm<sup>2</sup>; ALI: 6.44 kΩ*cm<sup>2</sup>; p<0.05) ALI cultures showed significantly decreased values compared to SMC. …”
-
13
-
14
-
15
-
16
-
17
-
18
-
19
-
20