Search alternatives:
significant effect » significant impact (Expand Search)
changes decrease » larger decrease (Expand Search), change increases (Expand Search)
largest decrease » larger decrease (Expand Search), marked decrease (Expand Search)
effect decrease » effects decreased (Expand Search)
significant effect » significant impact (Expand Search)
changes decrease » larger decrease (Expand Search), change increases (Expand Search)
largest decrease » larger decrease (Expand Search), marked decrease (Expand Search)
effect decrease » effects decreased (Expand Search)
-
8101
The performance of S-YOFEO model on MOT17.
Published 2025“…OSA is highly sensitive to information of different scales, and its one-time aggregation property substantially decreases the computational overhead of the model. …”
-
8102
Five multi-target tracking evaluation indexes.
Published 2025“…OSA is highly sensitive to information of different scales, and its one-time aggregation property substantially decreases the computational overhead of the model. …”
-
8103
Algorithm flowchart of OFEO.
Published 2025“…OSA is highly sensitive to information of different scales, and its one-time aggregation property substantially decreases the computational overhead of the model. …”
-
8104
Partial tracking results of MOT17 dataset.
Published 2025“…OSA is highly sensitive to information of different scales, and its one-time aggregation property substantially decreases the computational overhead of the model. …”
-
8105
Improved detection layer.
Published 2025“…OSA is highly sensitive to information of different scales, and its one-time aggregation property substantially decreases the computational overhead of the model. …”
-
8106
The performance of S-YOFEO model on MOT16.
Published 2025“…OSA is highly sensitive to information of different scales, and its one-time aggregation property substantially decreases the computational overhead of the model. …”
-
8107
The matching process of EIOU.
Published 2025“…OSA is highly sensitive to information of different scales, and its one-time aggregation property substantially decreases the computational overhead of the model. …”
-
8108
-
8109
Descriptive statistics and variable definitions.
Published 2024“…The findings indicate that consumption inequality has a significant negative impact on SWB. Specifically, for every unit increase in consumption inequality, the probability of individuals rating their SWB as “Happy” and “Very happy” decreases by 0.37% and 5.45% respectively. …”
-
8110
The results of endogenous analysis.
Published 2024“…The findings indicate that consumption inequality has a significant negative impact on SWB. Specifically, for every unit increase in consumption inequality, the probability of individuals rating their SWB as “Happy” and “Very happy” decreases by 0.37% and 5.45% respectively. …”
-
8111
Correlation test.
Published 2024“…The findings indicate that consumption inequality has a significant negative impact on SWB. Specifically, for every unit increase in consumption inequality, the probability of individuals rating their SWB as “Happy” and “Very happy” decreases by 0.37% and 5.45% respectively. …”
-
8112
S1 Dataset -
Published 2024“…The findings indicate that consumption inequality has a significant negative impact on SWB. Specifically, for every unit increase in consumption inequality, the probability of individuals rating their SWB as “Happy” and “Very happy” decreases by 0.37% and 5.45% respectively. …”
-
8113
The mediation of confidence.
Published 2024“…The findings indicate that consumption inequality has a significant negative impact on SWB. Specifically, for every unit increase in consumption inequality, the probability of individuals rating their SWB as “Happy” and “Very happy” decreases by 0.37% and 5.45% respectively. …”
-
8114
Robustness test.
Published 2024“…The findings indicate that consumption inequality has a significant negative impact on SWB. Specifically, for every unit increase in consumption inequality, the probability of individuals rating their SWB as “Happy” and “Very happy” decreases by 0.37% and 5.45% respectively. …”
-
8115
Results of normal and wide step width (cm).
Published 2025“…Wide running significantly decreased the coordination variability in the ankle-knee sagittal during LR (p<0.001) and knee-hip sagittal during LR (p=0.007) and push-off (p=0.016). …”
-
8116
Raw data 16–20.
Published 2025“…Wide running significantly decreased the coordination variability in the ankle-knee sagittal during LR (p<0.001) and knee-hip sagittal during LR (p=0.007) and push-off (p=0.016). …”
-
8117
Demographics, SD= Standard Deviation.
Published 2025“…Wide running significantly decreased the coordination variability in the ankle-knee sagittal during LR (p<0.001) and knee-hip sagittal during LR (p=0.007) and push-off (p=0.016). …”
-
8118
Raw data 6–9 and 15.
Published 2025“…Wide running significantly decreased the coordination variability in the ankle-knee sagittal during LR (p<0.001) and knee-hip sagittal during LR (p=0.007) and push-off (p=0.016). …”
-
8119
Raw data 1–5.
Published 2025“…Wide running significantly decreased the coordination variability in the ankle-knee sagittal during LR (p<0.001) and knee-hip sagittal during LR (p=0.007) and push-off (p=0.016). …”
-
8120
Raw data 10–14.
Published 2025“…Wide running significantly decreased the coordination variability in the ankle-knee sagittal during LR (p<0.001) and knee-hip sagittal during LR (p=0.007) and push-off (p=0.016). …”