Balance test results. by Le Zhu (1771669)

“…Our analyses underline a significant decrease in the environment and governance CSR among non-financial firms, while no significant impact is observed on the social dimension of CSR. …”

Variables. by Le Zhu (1771669)

“…Our analyses underline a significant decrease in the environment and governance CSR among non-financial firms, while no significant impact is observed on the social dimension of CSR. …”

Results of the parallel trend test. by Le Zhu (1771669)

“…Our analyses underline a significant decrease in the environment and governance CSR among non-financial firms, while no significant impact is observed on the social dimension of CSR. …”

Results of the exclusion of other policies. by Le Zhu (1771669)

“…Our analyses underline a significant decrease in the environment and governance CSR among non-financial firms, while no significant impact is observed on the social dimension of CSR. …”

Results of robustness tests. by Le Zhu (1771669)

“…Our analyses underline a significant decrease in the environment and governance CSR among non-financial firms, while no significant impact is observed on the social dimension of CSR. …”

Descriptive statistical of variables. by Le Zhu (1771669)

“…Our analyses underline a significant decrease in the environment and governance CSR among non-financial firms, while no significant impact is observed on the social dimension of CSR. …”

Baseline regression results. by Le Zhu (1771669)

“…Our analyses underline a significant decrease in the environment and governance CSR among non-financial firms, while no significant impact is observed on the social dimension of CSR. …”

The results of mediating mechanism test. by Le Zhu (1771669)

“…Our analyses underline a significant decrease in the environment and governance CSR among non-financial firms, while no significant impact is observed on the social dimension of CSR. …”

The results of Bootstrap Method and Sobel Test. by Le Zhu (1771669)

“…Our analyses underline a significant decrease in the environment and governance CSR among non-financial firms, while no significant impact is observed on the social dimension of CSR. …”

Impact of the NAMR on CSR dimensions (E, S, G). by Le Zhu (1771669)

“…Our analyses underline a significant decrease in the environment and governance CSR among non-financial firms, while no significant impact is observed on the social dimension of CSR. …”

Flow diagram showing number of subjects included in the study population. by Jung-Tae Kim (8997767)

Study selection criteria. by Filip Stanicic (17808254)

“…Phase II/III trials consistently reported significantly greater CAPS improvement with MDMA-AT vs. placebo with therapy (PT) after two or three interventional sessions. …”

PICOS criteria for the SLR. by Filip Stanicic (17808254)

“…Phase II/III trials consistently reported significantly greater CAPS improvement with MDMA-AT vs. placebo with therapy (PT) after two or three interventional sessions. …”

PRISMA flow chart. by Filip Stanicic (17808254)

“…Phase II/III trials consistently reported significantly greater CAPS improvement with MDMA-AT vs. placebo with therapy (PT) after two or three interventional sessions. …”

<b>Nest mass in forest tits </b><b><i>Paridae</i></b><b> </b><b>increases with elevation and decreasing body mass, promoting reproductive success</b> by Clara Wild (19246606)

“…Nest boxes were installed along an elevational gradient of approximately 1000 m a.sl., either in forest gaps with fluctuating microclimatic conditions or in closed forests with buffered microclimates. We found that nest mass increased by ~ 60% along the elevational gradient, but the effect of canopy openness on nest mass was not significant, while nest mass decreased along the ranked species from the smallest <i>Periparus ater</i> to the medium-sized <i>Cyanistes caeruleus</i> and the largest <i>Parus major</i>. …”

Study-related adverse events. by Benjamin R. Lewis (22279166)

“…In a linear mixed model analysis (LMM), the MBSR + PAP arm evidenced a significantly larger decrease in QIDS-SR-16 score than the MBSR-only arm from baseline to 2-weeks post-intervention (between-groups effect = 4.6, 95% CI [1.51, 7.70]; <i>p</i> = 0.008). …”

Study flow chart. by Benjamin R. Lewis (22279166)

“…In a linear mixed model analysis (LMM), the MBSR + PAP arm evidenced a significantly larger decrease in QIDS-SR-16 score than the MBSR-only arm from baseline to 2-weeks post-intervention (between-groups effect = 4.6, 95% CI [1.51, 7.70]; <i>p</i> = 0.008). …”

Study CONSORT diagram. by Benjamin R. Lewis (22279166)

“…In a linear mixed model analysis (LMM), the MBSR + PAP arm evidenced a significantly larger decrease in QIDS-SR-16 score than the MBSR-only arm from baseline to 2-weeks post-intervention (between-groups effect = 4.6, 95% CI [1.51, 7.70]; <i>p</i> = 0.008). …”

Assessing Bivalves as Biomonitors of Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances in Coastal Environments by Shannon E. Jones (17558652)

“…Additionally, the bioaccumulation factors of PFAS decrease with increasing organism size and age, suggesting that smaller and younger bivalves have greater bioaccumulation potential and are more susceptible to PFAS contamination. …”

Survey sample distribution. by Yin Liu (50073)

“…The results show that: (1) Based on the counterfactual hypothesis, if the farmers who obtain microcredit for poverty-alleviated population are not loaned, their production and operating income will decrease by 3.31%, that is, microcredit has a significant income-increasing effect, and the income-increasing effect of obtaining microcredit for the poverty-alleviated population on the monitoring objects is greater than the households that have lifted out of poverty. (2) The mechanism of action shows that the microcredit policy for the poverty- alleviated population promotes income increase by promoting farmers to increase material capital investment and social capital investment. (3) The income-increasing effect of obtain microcredit for poverty-alleviated population on the low-income initial endowment farmers is greater than that on high-income initial endowment farmers, and farmers with low-land initial endowment have a higher income increase effect, that is, a ‘raising the low ‘ effect. …”