Search alternatives:
significant effect » significant impact (Expand Search)
effect decrease » effects decreased (Expand Search)
linear decrease » linear increase (Expand Search)
lower decrease » larger decrease (Expand Search), teer decrease (Expand Search), we decrease (Expand Search)
significant effect » significant impact (Expand Search)
effect decrease » effects decreased (Expand Search)
linear decrease » linear increase (Expand Search)
lower decrease » larger decrease (Expand Search), teer decrease (Expand Search), we decrease (Expand Search)
-
41
Strain-stress maps of vertical pile foundation.
Published 2025“…The results demonstrate that under identical loading conditions, the maximum displacement of the VIPF (20.63 mm) is 23.8% lower than that of the VPF (27.06 mm). The outer ring of inclined piles in the VIPF significantly enhances structural stiffness through spatial synergy, achieving uniform load distribution and effective redistribution of pile-body internal forces. …”
-
42
Displacement-inclination variation graph.
Published 2025“…The results demonstrate that under identical loading conditions, the maximum displacement of the VIPF (20.63 mm) is 23.8% lower than that of the VPF (27.06 mm). The outer ring of inclined piles in the VIPF significantly enhances structural stiffness through spatial synergy, achieving uniform load distribution and effective redistribution of pile-body internal forces. …”
-
43
Soil modeling and mechanical parameters.
Published 2025“…The results demonstrate that under identical loading conditions, the maximum displacement of the VIPF (20.63 mm) is 23.8% lower than that of the VPF (27.06 mm). The outer ring of inclined piles in the VIPF significantly enhances structural stiffness through spatial synergy, achieving uniform load distribution and effective redistribution of pile-body internal forces. …”
-
44
Location of monitored piles.
Published 2025“…The results demonstrate that under identical loading conditions, the maximum displacement of the VIPF (20.63 mm) is 23.8% lower than that of the VPF (27.06 mm). The outer ring of inclined piles in the VIPF significantly enhances structural stiffness through spatial synergy, achieving uniform load distribution and effective redistribution of pile-body internal forces. …”
-
45
Axial force in the pressure zone.
Published 2025“…The results demonstrate that under identical loading conditions, the maximum displacement of the VIPF (20.63 mm) is 23.8% lower than that of the VPF (27.06 mm). The outer ring of inclined piles in the VIPF significantly enhances structural stiffness through spatial synergy, achieving uniform load distribution and effective redistribution of pile-body internal forces. …”
-
46
Pile-soil interaction.
Published 2025“…The results demonstrate that under identical loading conditions, the maximum displacement of the VIPF (20.63 mm) is 23.8% lower than that of the VPF (27.06 mm). The outer ring of inclined piles in the VIPF significantly enhances structural stiffness through spatial synergy, achieving uniform load distribution and effective redistribution of pile-body internal forces. …”
-
47
Bending moment in the tension zone.
Published 2025“…The results demonstrate that under identical loading conditions, the maximum displacement of the VIPF (20.63 mm) is 23.8% lower than that of the VPF (27.06 mm). The outer ring of inclined piles in the VIPF significantly enhances structural stiffness through spatial synergy, achieving uniform load distribution and effective redistribution of pile-body internal forces. …”
-
48
Sketch of forces on vertical and inclined piles.
Published 2025“…The results demonstrate that under identical loading conditions, the maximum displacement of the VIPF (20.63 mm) is 23.8% lower than that of the VPF (27.06 mm). The outer ring of inclined piles in the VIPF significantly enhances structural stiffness through spatial synergy, achieving uniform load distribution and effective redistribution of pile-body internal forces. …”
-
49
Displacement cloud maps.
Published 2025“…The results demonstrate that under identical loading conditions, the maximum displacement of the VIPF (20.63 mm) is 23.8% lower than that of the VPF (27.06 mm). The outer ring of inclined piles in the VIPF significantly enhances structural stiffness through spatial synergy, achieving uniform load distribution and effective redistribution of pile-body internal forces. …”
-
50
Morphing mesh.
Published 2025“…The results demonstrate that under identical loading conditions, the maximum displacement of the VIPF (20.63 mm) is 23.8% lower than that of the VPF (27.06 mm). The outer ring of inclined piles in the VIPF significantly enhances structural stiffness through spatial synergy, achieving uniform load distribution and effective redistribution of pile-body internal forces. …”
-
51
Bending moment in the pressure zone.
Published 2025“…The results demonstrate that under identical loading conditions, the maximum displacement of the VIPF (20.63 mm) is 23.8% lower than that of the VPF (27.06 mm). The outer ring of inclined piles in the VIPF significantly enhances structural stiffness through spatial synergy, achieving uniform load distribution and effective redistribution of pile-body internal forces. …”
-
52
Axial forces in the tension zone.
Published 2025“…The results demonstrate that under identical loading conditions, the maximum displacement of the VIPF (20.63 mm) is 23.8% lower than that of the VPF (27.06 mm). The outer ring of inclined piles in the VIPF significantly enhances structural stiffness through spatial synergy, achieving uniform load distribution and effective redistribution of pile-body internal forces. …”
-
53
VPF and VIPF.
Published 2025“…The results demonstrate that under identical loading conditions, the maximum displacement of the VIPF (20.63 mm) is 23.8% lower than that of the VPF (27.06 mm). The outer ring of inclined piles in the VIPF significantly enhances structural stiffness through spatial synergy, achieving uniform load distribution and effective redistribution of pile-body internal forces. …”
-
54
-
55
Functional and strength parameters.
Published 2025“…</p><p>Methods</p><p>Bilateral quantitative MRI of the lower limbs was performed in individuals with LGMD-R9 and healthy controls. …”
-
56
-
57
The Enzyme Effect: Broadening the Horizon of MS Optimization to Nontryptic Digestion in Proteomics
Published 2025“…Our results showed a linear <i>m</i>/<i>z</i> dependence for all enzymes, with Glu-C, Asp-N, and chymotrypsin requiring significantly lower energies than trypsin and Arg-C. …”
-
58
Principal component analysis of soil parameters.
Published 2025“…The data were analyzed using the General Linear Model (GLM) procedure in SAS version 9.4. The result showed that slope gradients, soil depths, and slope gradients interacting with soil depths had very highly, highly and significant effects on selected soil parameters, exchangeable bases, and extractable micronutrients. …”
-
59
Flow chart of research object screening.
Published 2025“…Estradiol exhibited significant non-linear relationship with ALI (P = 0.027), with multiple inflection points suggesting concentration-dependent effects.…”
-
60
Scheme of g-λ model with larger values λ.
Published 2024“…The stress-deformation model of the single uncoupled joint (g-λ model with λ ≥ 1) is employed to depict the nonlinearity of uncoupled joints, with a greater value of the parameter λ signifying a lower degree of non-linearity in the joint model curve. …”