Statins resulted in smaller neuronal soma size. by Shuk C. Tsoi (21192243)

“…Statin treatment decreased cell sizes in the larger cells more than in the smaller cells as seen in the greater divergence between lines plotted for larger cell somas (bottom panel). …”

Larger example of stimuli with cue relevant for Task 3. by Marcel F. Hinss (14675457)

Subjects:

Effects of s-ketamine and midazolam on respiratory parameters. by Oscar F. C. van den Bosch (22184246)

Subjects:

Effect of busulfan treatment on androgens and androgen receptors. by Lingjun Zhao (21763122)

Subjects:

Effect of busulfan treatment on the tight junction protein, occludin. by Lingjun Zhao (21763122)

Subjects:

Effects of busulfan treatment on CX43 and N-Cadherin. by Lingjun Zhao (21763122)

Subjects:

Effect of busulfan treatment on vimentin, a supporting cytoskeletal protein. by Lingjun Zhao (21763122)

Subjects:

Effects of busulfan treatment on the ultrastructure of the blood-testis barrier (BTB). by Lingjun Zhao (21763122)

Subjects:

Exposure to biologics during pregnancy does not affect placental antibody transfer of anti-SARS-CoV-2 neutralizing antibodies, but concomitant corticosteroid exposure may decrease... by Donna E. Leet (22772478)

Arctigenin decreased proliferation in colorectal cancer cells with no significant effect on normal cells. by Xiang-Fan Chen (13932983)

Effects of busulfan treatment (6 mg/kg) on the body and testes weights of mice over three weeks. by Lingjun Zhao (21763122)

Subjects:

Effects of busulfan treatment (6 mg/kg) on the epididymis and sperm of mice over a three-week period. by Lingjun Zhao (21763122)

Subjects:

Baseline patient characteristics. by Oscar F. C. van den Bosch (22184246)

Subjects:

Summary of the effect of MPDD on SDLP across all participants, and also participants categorized by driving styles (“NS” (no significant), “+” (significant increase), and “-” (significant decrease)). by Mobina Faqani (22783963)

“…<p>Summary of the effect of MPDD on SDLP across all participants, and also participants categorized by driving styles (“NS” (no significant), “+” (significant increase), and “-” (significant decrease)).…”

Summary of the effect of MPDD on ART and TIBL across all participants, and also participants categorized by driving styles (“NS” (no significant), “+” (significant increase), and “-” (significant decrease). by Mobina Faqani (22783963)

“…<p>Summary of the effect of MPDD on ART and TIBL across all participants, and also participants categorized by driving styles (“NS” (no significant), “+” (significant increase), and “-” (significant decrease).…”

Mean ± SD values of unipedal stance parameters evaluated at the different time points of the postural training session. by Cristina Dolciotti (16317330)

Subjects:

Mean ± SD of the different parameters relative to bipedal stance on soft support with the eyes open recorded in the Chewing and Hand Grip groups. by Cristina Dolciotti (16317330)

Subjects:

Time course of Path Length, LFS and Velocity during postural training. by Cristina Dolciotti (16317330)

Subjects:

Relation of the changes in Y Sway Amplitude and LFS induced by postural training with those in 95% Area. by Cristina Dolciotti (16317330)

Subjects:

Training-induced changes in bipedal stance. by Cristina Dolciotti (16317330)

Subjects: