Phase 2 significant effects. by Wendy C. Crone (2262169)

Phase 1 significant effects. by Wendy C. Crone (2262169)

A noxious temperature decrease without a prior increase produces a subtly larger decrease in pain intensity. by Benedict J. Alter (9745466)

Increasing gaps and decreasing returns attenuate spending effects. by William Minozzi (8564712)

Spatial information is significantly decreased in dCA1 and vCA1 in APP/PS1 mice. by Udaysankar Chockanathan (18510288)

Vesicle volume is larger in the skeletogenic cells compared to the ectodermal cells and is significantly larger under VEGFR inhibition. by Mark R. Winter (10178805)

Arctigenin decreased proliferation in colorectal cancer cells with no significant effect on normal cells. by Xiang-Fan Chen (13932983)

Structure stabilizes larger numbers of species, but increasing competitive asymmetry increases species loss. by Tristan Ursell (73348)

“…<b>(B)</b> Comparing identical conditions between two different system sizes (<i>L</i> = 100 and <i>L</i> = 200), the effects of disorder are relatively small in comparison to the effects of system size, with smaller system sizes (blue lines) showing a significant amplification of reduction in survival probability as compared to the larger system. …”

Species richness decreases significantly with increasing percent disturbance. by Catherine L. Cardelús (6429320)

Gut richness and diversity decrease significantly by week 5 of chemoradiotherapy. by Molly B. El Alam (10231830)

Correlations of cytokines that significantly change between the pre-infusion and post-infusion blood draws pearson’s correlation between cytokine pairs is indicated by color and si... by Jordan K. Abbott (8934239)

Subjects:

Example of predicted effects of choice bundling on preference for larger, later rewards (LLRs) over smaller, sooner rewards (SSRs). by Jeffrey S. Stein (11689918)

Summary of the effect of MPDD on SDLP across all participants, and also participants categorized by driving styles (“NS” (no significant), “+” (significant increase), and “-” (significant decrease)). by Mobina Faqani (22783963)

“…<p>Summary of the effect of MPDD on SDLP across all participants, and also participants categorized by driving styles (“NS” (no significant), “+” (significant increase), and “-” (significant decrease)).…”

Comparison of treatment effects between premolar extraction and mandibular third molar extraction groups. * p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01. by Lijuan Liu (136685)

Subjects:

Contact structure can have a significant impact on the population immunity threshold. by Simon Bauer (11378195)

Scheme of g-λ model with larger values λ. by Zhanfeng Fan (20390992)

Subjects:

Controller with a larger delay leads to significantly more pronounced outbreaks, especially with reactive control. by Kory D. Johnson (12519419)

Summary of the effect of MPDD on ART and TIBL across all participants, and also participants categorized by driving styles (“NS” (no significant), “+” (significant increase), and “-” (significant decrease). by Mobina Faqani (22783963)

“…<p>Summary of the effect of MPDD on ART and TIBL across all participants, and also participants categorized by driving styles (“NS” (no significant), “+” (significant increase), and “-” (significant decrease).…”

Adjusted mean values from the mixed-effects model for clinical outcomes. by Seungyoon Paik (14659575)

Subjects:

Concentration of RebA and Steviol showed increased significantly, whereas stevioside showed significant decrease in all the transgenic lines. by Nazima Nasrullah (6874496)