Search alternatives:
significant effect » significant impact (Expand Search)
longer decrease » linear decrease (Expand Search), largest decrease (Expand Search)
larger decrease » marked decrease (Expand Search)
effect release » effective release (Expand Search), effect repeated (Expand Search), direct release (Expand Search)
significant effect » significant impact (Expand Search)
longer decrease » linear decrease (Expand Search), largest decrease (Expand Search)
larger decrease » marked decrease (Expand Search)
effect release » effective release (Expand Search), effect repeated (Expand Search), direct release (Expand Search)
-
61
-
62
S1 File - Study on the releasing regularity of asphalt fume and its suppression technology
Published 2025Subjects: -
63
-
64
Immediate effects of cervical stimulation and diaphragmatic release on vocal production
Published 2021“…Objective: To verify the immediate effects of cervical stimulation and diaphragmatic release on the respiratory and phonatory function of adult women with no vocal complaints. …”
-
65
The effect of ionizing radiation on properties of fluoride-releasing restorative materials
Published 2020“…<div><p>Abstract The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of ionizing radiation from high energy X-ray on fluoride release, surface roughness, flexural strength, and surface chemical composition of the materials. …”
-
66
-
67
-
68
-
69
Different drug release mechanisms.
Published 2024“…The model dependent approaches revealed the Weibull model (AMD-10), the Zero order (AMD-3), and the Korsemeyer-Peppas models were the most effective predictions for the release of the pharmaceutical substance from the dosage form. …”
-
70
Time distortions are suppressed for longer Standard events.
Published 2022“…<b>a)</b> With a 120-ms S (corresponding to an 8.33 Hz attentive rhythm) we observed a decrease of the CE as a function of ISI: ISIs longer than 800 ms decreased subjective distortions of the stimuli. …”
-
71
Spatial information is significantly decreased in dCA1 and vCA1 in APP/PS1 mice.
Published 2024“…The spatial information in dCA1 was significantly larger than circularly shuffled spike trains with similar mean firing rates for C57BL/6 mice (mean ± std: empirical = 0.132 ± 0.048, shuffled = 0.124 ± 0.035, p < 0.001, two-sided Wilcoxon rank-sum test, n<sub>empirical</sub> = 305 units from 5 recording sessions, n<sub>shuffled</sub> = 30500 simulated units from 5 recording sessions), but not for APP/PS1 mice (mean ± std: empirical = 0.128 ± 0.051, shuffled = 0.123 ± .047, p = 0.39, two-sided Wilcoxon rank-sum test, n<sub>empirical</sub> = 180 units from 4 recording sessions, n<sub>shuffled</sub> = 18000 simulated units from 4 recording sessions). …”
-
72
-
73
Attachment and Release of Water Fleas’ Ephippia on a Medium-Sized Waterfowl’s Leg for Migration
Published 2023“…In this work, using the legs of American Pekin ducks as test samples, we found that a “coating” mechanism might play a significant role in this attachment and that surface tension-induced attraction might have a secondary effect on it. …”
-
74
Attachment and Release of Water Fleas’ Ephippia on a Medium-Sized Waterfowl’s Leg for Migration
Published 2023“…In this work, using the legs of American Pekin ducks as test samples, we found that a “coating” mechanism might play a significant role in this attachment and that surface tension-induced attraction might have a secondary effect on it. …”
-
75
Attachment and Release of Water Fleas’ Ephippia on a Medium-Sized Waterfowl’s Leg for Migration
Published 2023“…In this work, using the legs of American Pekin ducks as test samples, we found that a “coating” mechanism might play a significant role in this attachment and that surface tension-induced attraction might have a secondary effect on it. …”
-
76
-
77
In microglia, C1 reduced NO release triggered by IFNγ and PolyIC, and did not affect LPS induced cytokine release.
Published 2023“…Treatment with C1 (in blue) did not have a significant effect for the LPS-induced IL6 and TNFα release, but increased the release of IL1β at all tested concentrations (0.025 μM: p = 0.0037, 0.25 μM: p < 0.0001, 2.5 μM: p < 0.0001). …”
-
78
-
79
-
80