Search alternatives:
significant effects » significant effect (Expand Search), significantly affected (Expand Search)
effects decrease » effects decreased (Expand Search), effects regress (Expand Search)
bias decrease » sizes decrease (Expand Search), bias increases (Expand Search), a decrease (Expand Search)
significant effects » significant effect (Expand Search), significantly affected (Expand Search)
effects decrease » effects decreased (Expand Search), effects regress (Expand Search)
bias decrease » sizes decrease (Expand Search), bias increases (Expand Search), a decrease (Expand Search)
-
1
Summary of the effect of MPDD on SDLP across all participants, and also participants categorized by driving styles (“NS” (no significant), “+” (significant increase), and “-” (significant decrease)).
Published 2025“…<p>Summary of the effect of MPDD on SDLP across all participants, and also participants categorized by driving styles (“NS” (no significant), “+” (significant increase), and “-” (significant decrease)).…”
-
2
Summary of the effect of MPDD on ART and TIBL across all participants, and also participants categorized by driving styles (“NS” (no significant), “+” (significant increase), and “-” (significant decrease).
Published 2025“…<p>Summary of the effect of MPDD on ART and TIBL across all participants, and also participants categorized by driving styles (“NS” (no significant), “+” (significant increase), and “-” (significant decrease).…”
-
3
-
4
-
5
-
6
-
7
Risk of bias summary.
Published 2025“…The observed decrease in body weight could be partially attributed to factors influencing energy balance, as evidenced by the significantly lower mean calorie intake at the end of the intervention (1694.71 kcal/day, 95% CI: 1498.57–1890.85) compared to the baseline intake (2000.64 kcal/day, 95% CI: 1830–2172.98), despite the absence of intentional efforts to restrict energy intake by the participants. …”
-
8
Mean scores, standard deviations, and significance on key measures and subscales by gender group.
Published 2025Subjects: -
9
-
10
-
11
-
12
-
13
-
14
Decreased clonogenic capacity of U87MG and U251MG glioma cells dependent on SHG-44 concentration.
Published 2025“…<p><b>(A)</b> A significant decrease in the proliferative clonal capacity of U87MG colonies was observed with 70ΜM and 100ΜM SHG-44 treatment. …”
-
15
-
16
-
17
-
18
-
19
-
20