Search alternatives:
significant effects » significant effect (Expand Search), significantly affected (Expand Search)
increase decrease » increased release (Expand Search), increased crash (Expand Search)
effects decrease » effects decreased (Expand Search), effects regress (Expand Search)
significant effects » significant effect (Expand Search), significantly affected (Expand Search)
increase decrease » increased release (Expand Search), increased crash (Expand Search)
effects decrease » effects decreased (Expand Search), effects regress (Expand Search)
-
2141
Phosphorylation as an Effective Tool to Improve Stability and Reduce Toxicity of Antimicrobial Peptides
Published 2024“…Among them, W<sub>3</sub>BipY<sub>8</sub>-P stood out as the most promising peptide, exhibiting similar antibacterial activity as its unphosphorylated analog W<sub>3</sub>BipY<sub>8</sub> but with significantly reduced hemolytic activity (19-fold decrease), cytotoxicity (3.3-fold decrease), and an extended serum half-life 6.3 times longer than W<sub>3</sub>BipY<sub>8</sub>. …”
-
2142
Increased <i>Huwe1</i> after induction of Sox2 in mouse ES cells.
Published 2025“…<i>Atoh1</i> expression increased with <i>Sox2</i> at low levels but decreased at higher <i>Sox2</i> level. …”
-
2143
-
2144
-
2145
-
2146
Validation of MN705 treatment effects in human proximal tubular epithelial cells during TGF-
Published 2025Subjects: -
2147
-
2148
-
2149
-
2150
-
2151
-
2152
-
2153
Local consumer escalation process (adapted from Local Health Network (CALHN) procedure 2019) [16].
Published 2025Subjects: -
2154
-
2155
-
2156
ERI Thresholds Between Adjacent Zones.
Published 2025“…The thresholds of the ERI in the oasis zone-transition zone and the transition zone-desert zone were 0.08–0.085 and 0.111–0.118, respectively. (2) Socioeconomic factors, including infrastructure expansion, population density, and GDP, were dominant influences, contributing 64% to the ERI, whereas the influence of natural factors such as climate declined. (3) The low-ERI areas increased by 3.3% under government control, and the transition zones increased significantly, slowing the growth rate of the oasis zone. …”
-
2157
Location of the study area.
Published 2025“…The thresholds of the ERI in the oasis zone-transition zone and the transition zone-desert zone were 0.08–0.085 and 0.111–0.118, respectively. (2) Socioeconomic factors, including infrastructure expansion, population density, and GDP, were dominant influences, contributing 64% to the ERI, whereas the influence of natural factors such as climate declined. (3) The low-ERI areas increased by 3.3% under government control, and the transition zones increased significantly, slowing the growth rate of the oasis zone. …”
-
2158
Random Forest structure with cross-validation.
Published 2025“…The thresholds of the ERI in the oasis zone-transition zone and the transition zone-desert zone were 0.08–0.085 and 0.111–0.118, respectively. (2) Socioeconomic factors, including infrastructure expansion, population density, and GDP, were dominant influences, contributing 64% to the ERI, whereas the influence of natural factors such as climate declined. (3) The low-ERI areas increased by 3.3% under government control, and the transition zones increased significantly, slowing the growth rate of the oasis zone. …”
-
2159
Land use change from 1990 to 2020.
Published 2025“…The thresholds of the ERI in the oasis zone-transition zone and the transition zone-desert zone were 0.08–0.085 and 0.111–0.118, respectively. (2) Socioeconomic factors, including infrastructure expansion, population density, and GDP, were dominant influences, contributing 64% to the ERI, whereas the influence of natural factors such as climate declined. (3) The low-ERI areas increased by 3.3% under government control, and the transition zones increased significantly, slowing the growth rate of the oasis zone. …”
-
2160
Geographic data.
Published 2025“…The thresholds of the ERI in the oasis zone-transition zone and the transition zone-desert zone were 0.08–0.085 and 0.111–0.118, respectively. (2) Socioeconomic factors, including infrastructure expansion, population density, and GDP, were dominant influences, contributing 64% to the ERI, whereas the influence of natural factors such as climate declined. (3) The low-ERI areas increased by 3.3% under government control, and the transition zones increased significantly, slowing the growth rate of the oasis zone. …”