Showing 161 - 180 results of 8,537 for search '(( significant estimated decrease ) OR ( significant ((largest decrease) OR (larger decrease)) ))', query time: 0.59s Refine Results
  1. 161
  2. 162
  3. 163

    Host-to-tick transmission of <i>B</i>. <i>burgdorferi</i> from infected male and female C3H/HeJ mice to immature <i>I</i>. <i>scapularis</i> ticks decreased over the course of the... by Christopher B. Zinck (11985438)

    Published 2023
    “…<i>burgdorferi</i>. The highly significant 2-way interaction between mouse sex and infestation (p = 0.0002) indicates that the decrease in the HTT over time was larger in the female mice compared to the male mice.…”
  4. 164
  5. 165
  6. 166
  7. 167

    Data_Sheet_1_Planning With Patient-Specific Rectal Sub-Region Constraints Decreases Probability of Toxicity in Prostate Cancer Radiotherapy.pdf by Caroline Lafond (6790544)

    Published 2020
    “…</p><p>Results: AMD_RECT_SRR<sub>pl</sub> showed the largest SRR dose sparing, with significant mean dose reductions of 7.7, 3, and 2.3 Gy, with respect to the STD<sub>pl</sub>, SRR<sub>pl</sub>, and AMD_RECT<sub>pl</sub>, respectively. …”
  8. 168
  9. 169

    Seven forecast scenarios. by Ryan P. Thombs (9138968)

    Published 2025
    “…We find that a decrease in expenditures has a larger effect on decreasing energy consumption than an increase in expenditures does on increasing consumption. …”
  10. 170

    Forecast for each scenario, 2023-2032. by Ryan P. Thombs (9138968)

    Published 2025
    “…We find that a decrease in expenditures has a larger effect on decreasing energy consumption than an increase in expenditures does on increasing consumption. …”
  11. 171

    Spatial information is significantly decreased in dCA1 and vCA1 in APP/PS1 mice. by Udaysankar Chockanathan (18510288)

    Published 2024
    “…The spatial information in dCA1 was significantly larger than circularly shuffled spike trains with similar mean firing rates for C57BL/6 mice (mean ± std: empirical = 0.132 ± 0.048, shuffled = 0.124 ± 0.035, p < 0.001, two-sided Wilcoxon rank-sum test, n<sub>empirical</sub> = 305 units from 5 recording sessions, n<sub>shuffled</sub> = 30500 simulated units from 5 recording sessions), but not for APP/PS1 mice (mean ± std: empirical = 0.128 ± 0.051, shuffled = 0.123 ± .047, p = 0.39, two-sided Wilcoxon rank-sum test, n<sub>empirical</sub> = 180 units from 4 recording sessions, n<sub>shuffled</sub> = 18000 simulated units from 4 recording sessions). …”
  12. 172
  13. 173
  14. 174
  15. 175
  16. 176
  17. 177
  18. 178
  19. 179
  20. 180