Search alternatives:
significant estimated » significant estimates (Expand Search), significantly mitigated (Expand Search), significantly overestimated (Expand Search)
largest decrease » largest decreases (Expand Search), marked decrease (Expand Search)
larger decrease » marked decrease (Expand Search)
significant estimated » significant estimates (Expand Search), significantly mitigated (Expand Search), significantly overestimated (Expand Search)
largest decrease » largest decreases (Expand Search), marked decrease (Expand Search)
larger decrease » marked decrease (Expand Search)
-
161
-
162
-
163
Host-to-tick transmission of <i>B</i>. <i>burgdorferi</i> from infected male and female C3H/HeJ mice to immature <i>I</i>. <i>scapularis</i> ticks decreased over the course of the...
Published 2023“…<i>burgdorferi</i>. The highly significant 2-way interaction between mouse sex and infestation (p = 0.0002) indicates that the decrease in the HTT over time was larger in the female mice compared to the male mice.…”
-
164
-
165
-
166
-
167
Data_Sheet_1_Planning With Patient-Specific Rectal Sub-Region Constraints Decreases Probability of Toxicity in Prostate Cancer Radiotherapy.pdf
Published 2020“…</p><p>Results: AMD_RECT_SRR<sub>pl</sub> showed the largest SRR dose sparing, with significant mean dose reductions of 7.7, 3, and 2.3 Gy, with respect to the STD<sub>pl</sub>, SRR<sub>pl</sub>, and AMD_RECT<sub>pl</sub>, respectively. …”
-
168
-
169
Seven forecast scenarios.
Published 2025“…We find that a decrease in expenditures has a larger effect on decreasing energy consumption than an increase in expenditures does on increasing consumption. …”
-
170
Forecast for each scenario, 2023-2032.
Published 2025“…We find that a decrease in expenditures has a larger effect on decreasing energy consumption than an increase in expenditures does on increasing consumption. …”
-
171
Spatial information is significantly decreased in dCA1 and vCA1 in APP/PS1 mice.
Published 2024“…The spatial information in dCA1 was significantly larger than circularly shuffled spike trains with similar mean firing rates for C57BL/6 mice (mean ± std: empirical = 0.132 ± 0.048, shuffled = 0.124 ± 0.035, p < 0.001, two-sided Wilcoxon rank-sum test, n<sub>empirical</sub> = 305 units from 5 recording sessions, n<sub>shuffled</sub> = 30500 simulated units from 5 recording sessions), but not for APP/PS1 mice (mean ± std: empirical = 0.128 ± 0.051, shuffled = 0.123 ± .047, p = 0.39, two-sided Wilcoxon rank-sum test, n<sub>empirical</sub> = 180 units from 4 recording sessions, n<sub>shuffled</sub> = 18000 simulated units from 4 recording sessions). …”
-
172
-
173
-
174
-
175
-
176
-
177
-
178
-
179
-
180