Search alternatives:
significant estimated » significant estimates (Expand Search), significantly mitigated (Expand Search), significantly overestimated (Expand Search)
significant effects » significant effect (Expand Search), significantly affected (Expand Search)
significant estimated » significant estimates (Expand Search), significantly mitigated (Expand Search), significantly overestimated (Expand Search)
significant effects » significant effect (Expand Search), significantly affected (Expand Search)
-
121
-
122
-
123
-
124
Spatial distribution of average temperature and long-term trend from 2001 to 2020.
Published 2022Subjects: -
125
-
126
-
127
Effective population size (Ne) over generations based on linkage disequilibrium calculations.
Published 2021Subjects: -
128
-
129
-
130
-
131
The effects of anodal and cathodal tDCS are not correlated in the present study.
Published 2022Subjects: -
132
-
133
-
134
-
135
Models 7 to 12: estimation results.
Published 2025“…In comparison, a similar rise in neighboring countries’ prices leads to a 0.4 percent decrease in inbound tourists. Most economic freedom variables, including the Business Freedom Index, Investment Freedom Index, Labor Freedom Index, Trade Freedom Index, and Government Integrity Index, demonstrate statistically significant positive effects. …”
-
136
Models 1 to 6: estimation results.
Published 2025“…In comparison, a similar rise in neighboring countries’ prices leads to a 0.4 percent decrease in inbound tourists. Most economic freedom variables, including the Business Freedom Index, Investment Freedom Index, Labor Freedom Index, Trade Freedom Index, and Government Integrity Index, demonstrate statistically significant positive effects. …”
-
137
-
138
-
139
Influential plot: Pooled summary effect estimates with each study omitted at one time.
Published 2021Subjects: -
140
Effect estimates on intake of SSB, FV, and fish.
Published 2024“…</p><p>In IPW-PP analyses, at 6 m, a small decrease in BMI z-score (−0.030 [95% CI −0.057, −0.003]; <i>p</i> = 0.032) was observed, whereas no significant effect was observed in mini-HEI (0.027 [95% CI −0.002, 0.056]; <i>p</i> = 0.072), among those who had received any SMS program compared to the non-SMS group. …”