Search alternatives:
significant estimated » significant estimates (Expand Search), significantly mitigated (Expand Search), significantly overestimated (Expand Search)
significant factors » significant predictors (Expand Search)
factors decrease » factors increases (Expand Search)
significant estimated » significant estimates (Expand Search), significantly mitigated (Expand Search), significantly overestimated (Expand Search)
significant factors » significant predictors (Expand Search)
factors decrease » factors increases (Expand Search)
-
121
The global disease burden of osteoarthritis for both sexes in 204 countries and territories.
Published 2023Subjects: -
122
-
123
-
124
-
125
Multivariable associations between childhood factors and suicidal ideation.
Published 2022Subjects: -
126
-
127
-
128
-
129
-
130
-
131
-
132
-
133
-
134
-
135
-
136
Change in influenza vaccination uptake from May 2020 to October 2024 (weighted).
Published 2025Subjects: -
137
Spatial Dubin panel model estimation results.
Published 2024“…Based on the Reference Relationship Table of the Classification of Core Industries of Digital Economy and the International Patent Classification (2023), the patent authorization data of digital technology from 2012 to 2022 were obtained, and the spatiotemporal situation of China’s digital technology innovation was analyzed by using ArcGIS software, Dagum’s Gini coefficient, and Moran’s I index, and the spatial Dubin panel model was used to explore the influencing factors of digital technology innovation. It is found that: (1) the scale and vitality of China’s digital technology innovation have increased significantly, and there are obvious spatial differentiation characteristics, and the innovation level of "eastern coastal—central and western interior" is decreasing, forming a cluster distribution pattern in the Yangtze River Delta region, Beijing, Guangdong, and other places, and the degree of agglomeration is decreasing. (2) The overall regional differences in China’s digital technology innovation are large, the differences between the East and the West dominate the interregional differences, and the net differences between regions are the main factors leading to regional differences. (3) There is a significant positive spatial correlation between the scale and vitality of digital technology innovation, which has a significant spatial spillover effect. (4) The results confirm that the level of economic development, digital access, financial scientific and technological support, technology market development level, and R&D intensity have a significant positive impact on the scale and vitality of digital technology innovation; The investment in scientific and technological talents has a significant positive impact on the scale of digital technology innovation, but has no significant impact on the vitality of digital technology innovation.…”
-
138
Age-standardized rates of PUD globally and for 21 GBD regions by SDI, 1990–2021.
Published 2025Subjects: -
139
-
140