Search alternatives:
significant event » significant effect (Expand Search), significant level (Expand Search), significant effects (Expand Search)
event decrease » cement decreases (Expand Search), point decrease (Expand Search), levels decreased (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
significant event » significant effect (Expand Search), significant level (Expand Search), significant effects (Expand Search)
event decrease » cement decreases (Expand Search), point decrease (Expand Search), levels decreased (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
-
41
-
42
MiR-129-5p levels were decreased in mouse depression models.
Published 2025“…</b> The KEGG pathway analysis identifies the number of target genes within each pathway. Those with a p-value < 0.05 are considered significant. <b>L.…”
-
43
-
44
-
45
-
46
The mean and standard deviation of parameters.
Published 2024“…Secondary outcomes included performance, fear of movement, and perceived ankle instability, measured using the side-hop test, the Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia (TSK), and the Cumberland Ankle Instability Tool (CAIT), respectively. Results indicated a significant decrease in ML SI in both groups one month after treatment compared to before and after treatment (P = 0.013 and P<0.001, respectively). …”
-
47
-
48
-
49
-
50
-
51
-
52
Decreased clonogenic capacity of U87MG and U251MG glioma cells dependent on SHG-44 concentration.
Published 2025“…<p><b>(A)</b> A significant decrease in the proliferative clonal capacity of U87MG colonies was observed with 70ΜM and 100ΜM SHG-44 treatment. …”
-
53
Key safety measures including adverse events.
Published 2025“…Waist circumference (mean change (MC) −2.23 cm; 95% CI [−3.98, −0.49]; <i>p</i> = 0.01), BMI (MC −0.49 kg/m<sup>2</sup>; 95% CI [−0.88, −0.10[; <i>p</i> = 0.01), and android fat mass measured by DXA (MC −167 g; 95% CI [−264, −71[; <i>p</i> < 0.001) decreased in the COCP group over the study period whilst there was no statistically significant changes in these parameters in the metformin only group when compared to baseline.. …”
-
54
-
55
-
56
-
57
-
58
-
59
-
60