Showing 181 - 200 results of 17,970 for search '(( significant event decrease ) OR ( significant ((nn decrease) OR (a decrease)) ))', query time: 0.48s Refine Results
  1. 181

    Assessment of calcium events, pERK levels, NMDA receptor expression and extracellular zinc levels in <i>slc13a5</i> mutants. by Deepika Dogra (21072023)

    Published 2025
    “…<i>5a</i><sup><i>−/−</i></sup><i>;5b</i><sup><i>−/−</i></sup> larvae show a significant increase in calcium events compared to WTs. …”
  2. 182
  3. 183
  4. 184
  5. 185

    Supplementary data. by Malte Ostendarp (13217973)

    Published 2025
    “…In contrast, the addition of hydrogen at 26 °C caused a significant decrease in the photophysiology of both <i>Acropora</i> sp. and <i>P. verrucosa</i>. …”
  6. 186
  7. 187
  8. 188
  9. 189
  10. 190

    A sample choice question with a warning label. by Yulian Ding (5984591)

    Published 2024
    “…The random parameters logit model results showed a significant overall decrease in SSB purchases when a warning label was present, indicated by a significant negative coefficient associated with the label. …”
  11. 191
  12. 192
  13. 193
  14. 194
  15. 195
  16. 196
  17. 197

    Vps34 orchestrates transcriptional and epigenetic remodeling events corresponding to terminal eTreg differentiation during perinatal life. by Erienne G. Norton (9612079)

    Published 2025
    “…AP-1-related transcription factors with predicted decreased activity are labeled. See also <a href="http://www.plosbiology.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pbio.3003074#pbio.3003074.s016" target="_blank">S8 Table</a>. …”
  18. 198

    A sample choice question without a warning label. by Yulian Ding (5984591)

    Published 2024
    “…The random parameters logit model results showed a significant overall decrease in SSB purchases when a warning label was present, indicated by a significant negative coefficient associated with the label. …”
  19. 199

    Study flow chart. by Benjamin R. Lewis (22279166)

    Published 2025
    “…We recorded 12 study-related, Grade 1–2 AEs and no serious AEs. In a linear mixed model analysis (LMM), the MBSR + PAP arm evidenced a significantly larger decrease in QIDS-SR-16 score than the MBSR-only arm from baseline to 2-weeks post-intervention (between-groups effect = 4.6, 95% CI [1.51, 7.70]; <i>p</i> = 0.008). …”
  20. 200

    Study CONSORT diagram. by Benjamin R. Lewis (22279166)

    Published 2025
    “…We recorded 12 study-related, Grade 1–2 AEs and no serious AEs. In a linear mixed model analysis (LMM), the MBSR + PAP arm evidenced a significantly larger decrease in QIDS-SR-16 score than the MBSR-only arm from baseline to 2-weeks post-intervention (between-groups effect = 4.6, 95% CI [1.51, 7.70]; <i>p</i> = 0.008). …”