Search alternatives:
significant event » significant effect (Expand Search), significant level (Expand Search), significant effects (Expand Search)
event decrease » cement decreases (Expand Search), point decrease (Expand Search), levels decreased (Expand Search)
nn decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), a decrease (Expand Search), gy decreased (Expand Search)
significant event » significant effect (Expand Search), significant level (Expand Search), significant effects (Expand Search)
event decrease » cement decreases (Expand Search), point decrease (Expand Search), levels decreased (Expand Search)
nn decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), a decrease (Expand Search), gy decreased (Expand Search)
-
201
-
202
-
203
Training impact on electrical properties of P3 lumbar MNs. Rin: input resistance. Rheobase: lowest intensity of current injected in MNs to elicit an action potential (AP). AP threshold: voltage measured at the foot of the AP. AP amplitude: measured between the resting membrane potential and the AP peak. AP half width: time spent by the potential > 50% of the AP maximum amplitude. AP rise time: time spent by the potential between 10% and 90% of the AP maximum amplitude. AP half decay time: time spent by the potential between the AP maximum amplitude and the 50% decreasing amplitude. ADP: after-depolarization potential. All values are means ± SEM. The number of MNs recorded is indicated between brackets. ns: no significantly different....
Published 2025“…All values are means ± SEM. The number of MNs recorded is indicated between brackets. ns: no significantly different. …”
-
204
-
205
-
206
-
207
-
208
-
209
-
210
-
211
-
212
Renal outcomes of both treatment groups.
Published 2025“…Glycated haemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) levels, estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), blood pressure, electrolyte levels, and cardiovascular events were assessed at study completion.</p><p>Results</p><p>During a mean follow-up of 11.9 months, 40.4% of the participants in the intervention group (31.6% in the control group) achieved diabetes control (HbA1c < 7%), with a significant mean difference of −0.36% in HbA1c levels between the groups (95% CI: −0.54 – −0.19, P < 0.01). …”
-
213
-
214
-
215
-
216
-
217
-
218
-
219
-
220