Search alternatives:
significant decrease » significant increase (Expand Search), significantly increased (Expand Search)
significant event » significant effect (Expand Search), significant level (Expand Search), significant effects (Expand Search)
event decrease » cement decreases (Expand Search), point decrease (Expand Search), levels decreased (Expand Search)
significant decrease » significant increase (Expand Search), significantly increased (Expand Search)
significant event » significant effect (Expand Search), significant level (Expand Search), significant effects (Expand Search)
event decrease » cement decreases (Expand Search), point decrease (Expand Search), levels decreased (Expand Search)
-
1701
-
1702
-
1703
-
1704
-
1705
-
1706
-
1707
-
1708
-
1709
-
1710
-
1711
-
1712
-
1713
-
1714
-
1715
-
1716
-
1717
CONSORT diagram.
Published 2024“…The overall proportion of patients who experienced any adverse events was 57.8% in the GDFT group and 70.1% in the conventional group (P = 0.038), of which the occurrence of pleural effusion was significantly lower in the GDFT group than in the conventional group (9.5% vs. 19.7%; P = 0.024). …”
-
1718
Raw data.
Published 2024“…The overall proportion of patients who experienced any adverse events was 57.8% in the GDFT group and 70.1% in the conventional group (P = 0.038), of which the occurrence of pleural effusion was significantly lower in the GDFT group than in the conventional group (9.5% vs. 19.7%; P = 0.024). …”
-
1719
Postoperative outcomes.
Published 2024“…The overall proportion of patients who experienced any adverse events was 57.8% in the GDFT group and 70.1% in the conventional group (P = 0.038), of which the occurrence of pleural effusion was significantly lower in the GDFT group than in the conventional group (9.5% vs. 19.7%; P = 0.024). …”
-
1720
Postoperative complications.
Published 2024“…The overall proportion of patients who experienced any adverse events was 57.8% in the GDFT group and 70.1% in the conventional group (P = 0.038), of which the occurrence of pleural effusion was significantly lower in the GDFT group than in the conventional group (9.5% vs. 19.7%; P = 0.024). …”